A Case Study of Corpus-Informed Online Academic Writing for EFL Graduate Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v26i1.28-47Keywords:
English for Academic Purposes (EAP), Learner Corpus, Corpus-informed Online Materials Development, Research Article (RA), Abstract WritingAbstract
Research articles (RAs) have been recognized as a distinct genre in the English-using discourse community because of their unique writing conventions. Despite the great number of studies on the analysis of the textual or phrasal aspects of abstracts of RAs, few have been transformed into actual teaching materials for EFL graduate students. The purpose of this study is to extend the results of abstract analysis to the development of online course content for the explicit teaching of abstract writing in Applied Linguistics. Results of the comparison of patterns found in the corpora of 50 abstracts of RAs published in journals and 50 abstracts of papers given at conferences--written by novice, nonnative writers--to patterns in a learner corpus formed the core of the online course content, along with principles of L2 writing and CALL task design. An academic concordancer and a synchronous peer review tool were incorporated into the Moodle-based course. Formative evaluation of the unit on abstract writing was conducted with 35 students. The abstract-writing unit was then incorporated into an academic writing course in which the analysis of students' writing samples demonstrated some improvement in their writing. The study suggests that corpus-informed online instruction that includes learner corpus insights can facilitate EFL academic writing.
References
Anthony, L. (2004). AntConc (Version 3.0.1) [Computer software]. Waseda University, Waseda, Japan. Available at http://www.antlab.sci.waseda.ac.jp/software.html
Cortes, V. (2004). Lexical bundles in published and student disciplinary writing: Examples from history and biology. English for Specific Purposes, 23(4), 379-423.
Coxhead, A. (2006). Essentials of teaching academic vocabulary. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Dos Santos, B. M. (1996). The textual organization of research article abstracts in applied linguistics. Text, 16(4), 481-500.
Doughty, C. J., & Long, M. H. (2003). Optimal psycholinguistic environment for distance foreign language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 7(3), 50-80. Retrieved April 20, 2005, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol7num3/doughty/default.html
Elbow, P. (1991). Reflections on academic discourse: How it relates to freshmen and colleagues. College English, 53(2), 135-155.
Gledhill, C. (2000). The discourse function of collocation in research article introductions. English for Specific Purposes, 19(1), 115-135.
Granger, S. (2003). Error-tagged learner corpora and CALL: A promising synergy. CALICO Journal, 20(3), 465-480. Retrieved May 25, 2008, from https://calico.org/p-5-Calico%20Journal.html
Hegelheimer, V. (2006). Helping ESL writers through a multimodal, corpus-based, online grammar resource. CALICO Journal, 24(1), 5-32. Retrieved May 25, 2008, from https://calico.org/p-5-Calico%20Journal.html
Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary discourse: Social interactions in academic writing. London: Longman.
Hyland, K., & Tse, P. (2005). Metadiscourse in academic writing: A reappraisal. Applied Linguistics, 25 (2), 123-139.
Lau, H. H. (2004). The structure of academic journal abstracts written by Taiwanese PhD students. Taiwan Journal of TESOL, 1(1), 1-25.
Lee, D., & Swales, J. (2006). A corpus based EAP course for NNS doctoral students: Moving from available specialized corpora to self-compiled corpora. English for Specific Purposes, 25(1), 56-75.
Liou, H. C., & Chien, C. W. (2005, May). Effects of collaborative POWERful computational scaffolding on EFL writing. Paper presented at the CALICO 2005 Symposium, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.
Liou, H. C., Kuo, C. H., Chang, J. S., Chen, H. J., & Chang, C. F. (2005). Web-based academic English course design and material development. In English Teachers’ Association (Ed.), Selected papers from the 14th International Symposium on English Teaching, Vol. 1 (pp. 452-463). Taipei, Taiwan: The Crane Publishing Co.
Liu, L. E. (2002) A corpus-based lexical semantic investigation of verb-noun miscollocations in Taiwan learners’ English. Unpublished master’s thesis, Tamkang University, Taipei.
Lores, R. (2004). On RA abstracts: From rhetorical structure to thematic organization. English for Specific Purposes, 23(3), 280-302.
Martin, P. M. (2003). A genre analysis of English and Spanish research paper abstracts in experimental social sciences. English for Specific Purposes, 22(1), 25-43.
Ruiying, Y., & Allison, D. (2003). Research articles in applied linguistics: Moving form results to conclusions. English for Specific Purposes, 22(4), 365-385.
Ruiying, Y., & Allison, D. (2004). Research articles in applied linguistics: Structures from a functional perspective. English for Specific Purposes, 23(3), 264-279.
Salager-Meyer, F. (1990). Discoursal flaws in medical English abstracts: A genre analysis per research and text type. Text 10(4), 365-384.
Salager-Meyer, F. (1992). A text type and move analysis study of verb tense and modality distributions in medical English abstracts. English for Specific Purposes, 11(1), 93-133.
Samraj, B. (2002). Introduction in research articles: Variation across disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 21(1), 1-17.
Sengupta, S. (2003). Developing and evaluating a web-based resource for writing research articles. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(5), 489-504.
Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Thetela, P. (1997). Evaluated entities and parameters of value in academic research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 16(1), 101-118.
Upton, T. A., & Connor, U. (2001). Using computerized corpus analysis to investigate the text linguistic discourse move of a genre. English for Specific Purposes, 20(4), 313-329.
Vassileva, I. (2001). Commitment and detachment in English and Bulgarian academic writing. English for Specific Purposes, 20(1), 83-102.
