Effects of gloss types on vocabulary learning through reading: Comparison of single and multiple gloss types
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v30i0.203-229Keywords:
vocabulary, glossing, incidental learning, multiple-choice glosses, feedbackAbstract
This study examines which gloss type, single or multiple, is more effective for vocabulary learning through reading. Japanese university students read a text for comprehension on computers. The students were randomly divided into two groups: single gloss and multiple gloss groups. There were 15 target words in the text. Glosses were provided next to the target words in the form of blank boxes with pull-down menus. The single gloss group checked the meanings of the target words by simply clicking the arrow and locating one definition in their L1, Japanese. The multiple gloss group checked the meanings of the words in the same way; however, the students in the multiple gloss group had to choose the correct definition out of 4 options. The participants took 4 vocabulary tests: 1) pretest; 2) immediate test; 3) posttest one week later; and 4) delayed posttest one month later. The tests were all multiple-choice tests except for the pretest, which employed a meaning-supply test. The results showed a consistent pattern of single gloss type being more effective than multiple type. This was contrary to previous findings. Possible reasons and implications of the study will be discussed.References
Abraham, L. B. (2007). Second-language reading comprehensionand vocabulary learning withmultimedia. Hispania, 90, 98-108.
Al-Seghayer, K. (2001). The effect of multimedia annotation modes on L2 vocabulary acquisition: A comparative study. Language Learning & Technology, 5, 202-232.
Chun, D. M., & Plass, J. L. (1996). Effects of multimedia annotations on vocabulary acqui-sition. Modern Language Journal, 80, 183-198.
Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155-159.
Coxhead, A. (2000). A new academic word list. TESOL Quarterly, 34, 213-238.
Craik, F. I., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory re-search. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671-684.
Davis, J. N., & Lyman-Hager, M. (1997). Computers and L2 reading: Student performance, student attitudes. Foreign Language Annals, 30, 58-72.
Erçetin, G. (2003). Exploring ESL learners’ use of hypermedia reading glosses. CALICO Journal, 20, 261-283.
Fischer, R. (2007). How do we know what students are actually doing? Monitoring stu-dents’ behavior in CALL. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20, 409-442.
Flesch, R. (1948). A new readability yardstick. Journal of Applied Psychology, 32, 221–233.
Folse, K. (2004). Vocabulary myths. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Gettys, S., Imhof, L. A., & Kautz, J. O. (2001). Computer-assisted reading: The effect of glossing format on comprehension and vocabulary retention. Foreign Language Annals, 34, 91-106.
Grace, C. A. (1998). Retention of word meaning inferred from context and sentence-level translations: Implications for the design of beginning-level CALL software. The Modern Language Journal, 82, 533-544.
Horst, M., Cobb, T., & Meara, P. (1998). Beyond a clockwork orange: Acquiring second language vocabulary through reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 11, 207-223.
Hulstijn, H. J., Hollander, M., & Greidanus, T. (1996). Incidental vocabulary learning by advanced foreign language students: The influence of marginal glosses, diction-ary use, and reoccurrence of unknown words. Modern Language Journal, 80, 327-339.
Hulstijn, J. H. (1992). Retention of inferred and given word meanings: Experiments in in-cidental vocabulary learning. In P. Arnaud, & H. Bejoint (Eds.), Vocabulary and applied linguistics (pp. 113-125). London: MacMillan.
Jacobs, M. G., Dufon, P., & Hong, C. F. (1994). L1 and L2 vocabulary glosses in L2 read-ing passages: Their effectiveness for increasing comprehension and vocabulary knowledge. Journal of Research in Reading, 17, 19-28.
Knight, S. (1994). Dictionary use while reading: The effects on comprehension and vo-cabulary acquisition for students of different verbal abilities. Modern Language Journal, 78, 285-299.
Krashen, S. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. Harlow, UK: Longman.
Laufer, B., & Hill, M. (2000). What lexical information do L2 learners select in a CALL dictionary and how does it affect word retention? Language Learning & Tech-nology, 3, 58-76.
Laufer, B., & Hulstijn, J. (2001). Incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second language: The construct of task-induced involvement. Applied Linguistics, 22, 1-26.
Laufer, B., & Kimmel, M. (1997). Bilingualised dictionaries: How learners really use them. System, 25, 361-369.
Lomicka, L. L. (1998). To gloss or not to gloss: An investigation of reading comprehension online. Language Learning & Technology, 1, 41-50.
Miyasako, N. (2002). Does text-glossing have any effects on incidental vocabulary learn-ing through reading for Japanese senior high school students? Language Educa-tion & Technology, 39, 1-20.
Nagata, N. (1999). The effectiveness of computer-assisted interactive glosses. Foreign Language Annals, 32, 469-479.
Nagy, W. (1997). On the role of context in first- and second-language vocabulary learning. In N. Schmitt & M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy (pp. 64-83). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pardo-Ballester, C., & Rodríguez, J. C. (2010). Developing Spanish online readings using design-based research. CALICO Journal, 27, 540-553.
Paribakht, T., & Wesche, M. (1996). Enhancing vocabulary acquisition through reading: A hierarchy of text-related exercise types. The Canadian Modern Language Re-view, 52, 155-178.
Plass, J. L., Chun, D. M., Mayer, R. E., & Leutner, D. (1998). Supporting visual and ver-bal learning preferences in a second language multimedia learning environment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 25-36.
Rott, S. (2005). Processing glosses: A qualitative exploration of how form-meaning con-nections are established and strengthened. Reading in a Foreign Language, 17, 95-124.
Rott, S., & Williams, J. (2003). Making form-meaning connections while reading: A quali-tative analysis of the effect of input and output tasks on word learning. Reading in a Foreign Language, 15, 45-74.
Rott, S., Williams, J., & Cameron, R. (2002). The effect of multiple-choice L1 glosses and input-output cycles on lexical acquisition and retention. Language Teaching Research, 6, 183-222.
Swanborn, L. M., & De Glopper, K. (1999). Incidental word learning while reading; A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 69, 261-285.
Watanabe, Y. (1997). Effects of increased processing on incidental learning of foreign lan-guage vocabulary. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 287-307.
West, M. (1953). A general service list of English words. London: Longman.
Yeh, Y., & Wang, C. W. (2003). Effects of multimedia vocabulary annotations and learning styles on vocabulary learning. CALICO Journal, 21, 131-144.
Yoshii, M. (2006). L1 and L2 glosses: Their effects on incidental vocabulary learning. Language Learning & Technology, 10, 85-101.
Yoshii, M., & Flaitz, J. (2002). Second language incidental vocabulary retention: The ef-fect of text and picture annotation types. CALICO Journal, 20, 33-58.