“I am proud that I did it and it’s a piece of me”: Digital Storytelling in the Foreign Language Classroom
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.30.1.44-62Keywords:
digital storytelling, output, focus on meaning, real world communicationAbstract
This case study examines students’ experiences regarding the infusion of digital storytelling in their high school fourth-year Spanish class. The aim of this case study is to determine if digital storytelling can be an effective tool for language learners to communicate emotion and present information to an audience. Sources of information for this case study include pre- and post- open-ended questionnaires, pre- and post-focus groups, semi-structured subsequent interviews, as well as observation and reflection journals. The findings reveal an epistemological shift that frames students’ perspectives. The data recount a shift in the understanding of the purpose of the digital storytelling task in the sense that the learners’ focus changes from the elements of language and technology to a meaningful project as a whole. The findings also confirm that digital storytelling projects adhere to the presentational mode of communication, follow the writing process, and as well as engage students in a meaningful, real world task in the foreign language classroom.References
Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. (2006). The ASCD High School Reform Proposal. Retrieved from http://www.ascd.org/public-policy/High-School-Reform/High-SchoolReform-Summary.aspx
Banaszewski, T. (2002, Jan/Feb). Digital storytelling finds its place in the classroom. MultiMedia & Internet @ Schools. Retrieved December 17, 2012, from http://www.infotoday.com/ mmschools/jan02/banaszewski.htm
Brown, H. D. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching (5th ed.). White Plains, NY: Pearson Longman.
Castañeda, M., & Rodríguez-González, E. (2011). L2 speaking self-ability perceptions through multiple video speech drafts. Hispania, 94(3), 483-501.
CDW-Government. (2012). Learn now, lecture later. Retrieved from http://newsroom.cdwg.com/ features/feature-06-26-12.html
Center for Digital Storytelling (CDS). (n.d.). Retrieved November 1, 2009, from http://www. storycenter.org/about.html
Chapelle, C. (2001). Computer applications in second language acquisition: Foundations for teaching, testing and research. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Cloud, N., Lakin, J., & Leininger, E. (2011). Learner-centered teaching: The core of effective practices for adolescent english language learners. TESOL Journal, 2(2), 132–155. doi:10.5054/tj.2011.250377
Curtain, H., & Dahlberg, C. A. (2009). Languages and children: Making the match: New languages for young learners, grades K-8. Boston, MA: Pearson.
Davis, A. (2004). Co-authoring identity: Digital storytelling in an urban middle school. THEN: Technology, Humanities, Education, & Narrative, 1(1). Retrieved December 17, 2012, from http://thenjournal.org/feature/61/
Duff, P. A. (2008). Case study research in applied linguistics. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. New York: Oxford University Press.
Ellis, R. (2006). Current issues in the teaching of grammar: An SLA perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 40(1), 83–107. doi:10.2307/40264512
Ellis, R., Basturkmen, H., & Loewen, S. (2001). Learner uptake in communicative ESL lessons. Language Learning, 51(2), 281–318. doi:10.1111/1467-9922.00156
Ferris, D. R. (2004). The “grammar correction” debate in L2 writing: Where are we, and where do we go from here? (and what do we do in the meantime …?). Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(1), 49–62. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2004.04.005
Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32(4), 365-387. doi:10.2307/356600
Gold, R. L. (1958). Roles in sociological field observations. Social Forces, 36(3), 217–223. doi:10.2307/2573808
Hadley, A. O. (2001). Teaching language in context. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
Hafner, C. A., & Miller, L. (2011). Fostering learner autonomy in English for science: A collaborative digital video project in a technological learning environment. Language Learning & Technology, 15(3), 68–86. Retrieved December 13, 2011, from http://llt.msu.edu/issues/ october2011/hafnermiller.pdf
Hayes, C. (2011). “Nihon to Watashi: Japan and myself” — Digital stories to enhance student-centered Japanese language learning. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 8(1), 291-299.
Jonassen, D., Peck, K., & Wilson, B. (1999). Learning with technology: A constructivist perspective. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
Kajder, S. (2004). Enter here: Personal narrative and digital storytelling. The English Journal, 94(3), 64. doi:10.2307/4128811
Kern, R. G., & Schultz, J. M. (1992). The effects of composition instruction on intermediate level French students’ writing performance: Some preliminary findings. The Modern Language Journal, 76(1), 1-13.
Lambert, J. (2006). Digital storytelling: Capturing lives, creating community (2nd ed.). Berkley: Digital Diner Press.
Lambert, J. (2007). Digital storytelling cookbook. San Francisco: Digital Diner Press.
Leki, I., Cumming, A. H., & Silva, T. (2008). A synthesis of research on second language writing in English. New York: Taylor & Francis US.
Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(1), 37–66. doi:10.1017/S0272263197001034
Matsuda, P. K. (2003). Second language writing in the twentieth century: A situated historical perspective. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Exploring The dynamics of second language writing (pp. 15–34). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Merriam, S. B. (2002). Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
National Standards in Foreign Language Education Project. (2006). Standards for foreign language learning in the 21st century. Lawrence: Allen Press.
New London Group (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60–93.
New London Group. (2000). A pedagogy of multiliteracies designing social futures. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures (pp. 9–37). New York, NY: Routledge.
Nunan, D. (2004). Task-based language teaching. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Ohler, J. (2006). The world of digital storytelling. Educational Leadership, 63(4), 44-47.
Olsen, S. (1980). Foreign language departments and computer-assisted instruction: A survey. The Modern Language Journal, 64(3), 341–349. doi:10.2307/324501
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Phillips, J. K. (2008). Foreign language standards and the contexts of communication. Language Teaching, 41(01), 93–102. doi:10.1017/S0261444807004752
Ribe, R., & Vidal, N. (1993). Project work step by step. Oxford: Heinemann.
Richards, J. C., Platt, J. T., & Weber, H. (1985). Longman dictionary of applied linguistics. Harlow, Essex, England: Longman.
Romano, T. (2000). Blending genre, altering style: Writing multigenre papers. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook; Heinemann.
Sadik, A. (2008). Digital storytelling: A meaningful technology-integrated approach for engaged student learning. Educational Technology Research & Development, 56(4), 487-506. doi:10.1007/s11423-008-9091-8
Sandrock, P., & Webb, E. (2003). Learning languages in middle schools. D. Robinson (Ed.), National Council of State Supervisors of Foreign Languages (Position Paper). Retrieved December 17, 2012, from http://ncssfl.org/papers/FinalMiddleSchool.pdf
Scott County Digital Storytelling Center (SCDSC) (n.d.) Retrieved January 2, 2010, from http://www.dtc.scott.k12.ky.us/technology/digitalstorytelling/ds.html
Scott, V. M. (1996). Rethinking foreign language writing. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
Shrum, J. L., & Glisan, E. W. (2010). Teacher’s handbook: Contextualized language instruction (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Heinle Cengage.
Silva, T. (1990). Second language composition instruction: Developments, issues, and directions in ESL. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom (pp. 11– 23). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford applied linguistics. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Swender, E. (2003). Oral proficiency testing in the real world: Answers to frequently asked questions. Foreign Language Annals, 36(4), 520–526. doi:10.1111/j.1944-9720.2003.tb02141.x
Ushida, E. (2005). The role of students’ attitudes and motivation in second language learning in online language courses. CALICO Journal, 23(1), 49–78.
Valdés, G. (2001). Heritage language students: Profiles and possibilities. In J. K. Peyton, D. A. Ranard, & S. McGinnis (Eds.), Heritage languages in America preserving a national resource (pp. 1– 41). Washington, DC: ERIC Clearinghouse on Languages and Linguistics.
Vinogradova, P., Linville, H. A., & Bickel, B. (2011). “Listen to my story and you will know me”: Digital stories as student-centered collaborative projects. TESOL Journal, 2(2), 173–202. doi:10.5054/tj.2011.250380
Zhao, Y. (2003). Recent developments in technology and language learning: A literature review and meta-analysis. CALICO Journal, 21(1), 7–27.
