Virtual Immersion
The Role of CAVE and PC Technology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v26i2.337-362Keywords:
Virtual Reality Technology, CAVE, PC Technology, L2 Pedagogical Framework, Student EngagementAbstract
Given the reality that computer games are ubiquitous in everyday life, researchers (Godwin-Jones, 2005; Purushotma, 2005) are touting the potential of making use of them in the second language classroom. In the current paper, we situate virtual reality (VR) technology within an L2 pedagogical framework and argue that it is a viable resource for enabling students to experience the target culture in ways that are impossible through the use of other technologies. In addition, we present the results of a pilot project in which we compare the effectiveness of two VR environments (CAVE and PC technology) on a variety of measures of student engagement: cultural awareness, collaboration, and overall experience. We argue that although the CAVE technology is perhaps the more exciting and immersive medium, its exorbitant cost and large scale make it an unfeasible prospect for most schools. The PC version of the game is readily accessible, can be run at no additional cost to the end user, and provides a positive and potentially more engaging experience for students.
References
Bakas, C., & Mikropoulos, T. A. (2003). Design of virtual environments for the comprehension of planetary phenomena based on students’ ideas. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 949–967.
Barr, D., Leakey, J., & Ranchoux, A. (2005). Told like it is! An evaluation of an integrated oral development pilot project. Language Learning & Technology, 9(3), 55–78. Retrieved November 11, 2008, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol9num3/barr/default.html
Blin, F. (2004). CALL and the development of learner autonomy: Towards an activity-theoretical perspective. ReCALL, 16, 377–395.
Buckingham, D. (2006). Children and new media. In L. A. Lievrouw & S. Livingstone (Eds.), The handbook of new media (pp. 75–91). London: Sage Publications.
Chun, D. M. (2007). Come ride the wave: But where is it taking us? CALICO Journal, 24, 239–252. Retrieved July 15, 2007, from https://calico.org/page.php?id=5
Dennen, V. P., & Branch, R. C. (1996). Considerations for designing instructional virtual environments. In R. E. Griffin, D. G. Beauchamp, J. M. Hunter, & C. B. Schiffman (Eds.), Eyes on the Future: Converging images, ideas, and instruction. Selected readings from the Annual Conference of the International Visual Literacy Association (pp. 101–110). (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED391476)
Doughty, C. J., & Long, M. H. (2003). Optimal psycholinguistic environments for distance foreign language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 7(3), 50–80. Retrieved April 12, 2005, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol7num3/doughty/default.html
Dubreil, S. (2006). Gaining perspective on culture through CALL. In L. Ducate & N. Arnold (Eds.), Calling on CALL: From theory and research to new directions in foreign language teaching (pp. 237–268). San Marcos, TX: CALICO.
Ellis, R. (2006). Current issues in the teaching of grammar: An SLA perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 40, 83–107.
Furstenberg, G., Levet, S., English, K., & Maillet, K. (2001). Giving a virtual voice to the silent language of culture: The Cultura project. Language Learning & Technology, 5(1), 55–102. Retrieved April 5, 2006, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol5num1/furstenberg
Godwin-Jones, R. (2005). Messaging, gaming, peer-to-peer sharing: Language learning strategies & tools for the Millennial Generation. Language Learning & Technology, 9(1), 17–22. Retrieved November 12, 2005, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol9num1/emerging/default.html
Hager, M. (2005). Using German web sites to teach culture in German courses. CALICO Journal, 22, 269–284. Retrieved May 9, 2007, from https://calico.org/page.php?id=5
Heift, T. (2004). Corrective feedback and learner uptake in CALL. ReCALL, 16, 416–431.
Hémard, D. (2006). Evaluating hypermedia structures as a means of improving language learning strategies and motivation. ReCALL, 18, 24–44.
Herron, C., Dubreil, S., Corrie, C., & Cole, S. (2002). A classroom investigation: Can video improve intermediate-level French language students’ ability to learn about a foreign culture? Modern Language Journal, 86, 36–53.
Huebner, T. (1995). A framework for investigating the effectiveness of study abroad programs. In C. Kramsch (Ed.), Redefining the boundaries of language study (pp. 185–217). Boston: Heinle and Heinle.
Karlstroem, P., Cerratto-Pargman, T., Lindstroem, H., & Knutsson, O. (2007). Tool mediation in focus on form activities: Case studies in a grammar-exploring environment. ReCALL, 19, 39–56.
Kovalik, D. L., & Kovalik, L. M. (2002). Language learning simulations: A Piagetian perspective. Simulation & Gaming, 33, 345–352.
LeLoup, J. W., & Ponterio, R. (2004). On the net: Virtual museums on the web: El Museo Thyssen-Bornemisza. Language Learning & Technology, 8(3), 3–8. Retrieved February 2, 2006, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol8num3/net/default.html
Levy, M. (2007). Culture, culture learning and new technologies: Towards a pedagogical framework. Language Learning & Technology, 11(2), 104–127. Retrieved June 17, 2007, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol11num2/levy/default.html
Liaw, M-L. (2006). E-learning and the development of intercultural competence. Language Learning & Technology, 10(3), 49–64. Retrieved June 15, 2007, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol10num3/liaw
Little, D. (1995). Learning as dialogue: The dependence of learner autonomy on teacher autonomy. System, 23, 175–181.
Littlewood, W. (2004). The task-based approach: Some questions and suggestions. ELT Journal, 58(4), 319–326.
Oxford, R. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. New York: Newbury House.
National Institute on Media and the Family. (2006). Effects of video game playing on children. Retrieved May 2007, from http://www.mediafamily.org/facts/facts_effect.shtml
Purushotma, R. (2005). Commentary: You’re not just studying, you’re just … . Language Learning & Technology, 9(1), 80–96. Retrieved December 19, 2005, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol9num1/purushotma/default.html
Robinson-Stuart, G., & Nocon, H. (1996). Second culture acquisition: Ethnography on the foreign language classroom. Modern Language Journal, 80, 431–449.
Sachs, R., & Polio, C. (2007). Learners’ uses of two types of written feedback on a L2 writing revision task. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 29, 67–100.
Schwienhorst, K. (2002). Why virtual, why environments? Implementing virtual reality concepts in computer-assisted language learning. Simulation & Gaming, 33, 196–209.
Simpson, E. S. (2005). Evolution in the classroom: What teachers need to know about the video game generation. TechTrends: Linking Research and Practice to Improve Learning, 49(5), 17–22.
Skehan, P. (1991). Individual differences in second language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 275–298.
Spenader, A. J. (2005). Cross-cultural adaptation and language acquisition in high school study abroad. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
Standards for Foreign Language Learning: Preparing for the 21st Century. (1996). Yonkers, NY: Standards for Foreign Language Learning Project.
Standards for Foreign Language Learning in the 21st Century. (1999). Yonkers, NY: Standards for Foreign Language Learning Project.
Standards for Foreign Language Learning in the 21st Century. (2006). Lawrence, KS: Allen Press.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Trindale, J. F., & Fiulhais, C. (2000). Using virtual environments for studying water phases and phase transitions. In S. Young, J. Greer, & H. Maurer (Eds.), Proceedings of ICCE/ICCAI 2000—8th International Conference on Computers in Education/International Conference on Computer-Assisted Instruction Learning Societies in the New Millennium: Creativity, Caring & Commitments
(pp. 413–416). Hsinchu, Taiwan: AACE-APC/National Tsing Hua University.
Tseng, Y.-H. (2002). A lesson in culture. ELT Journal, 56(1), 11–21.
Tsubota, Y., Dantsuji, M., & Kawahara, T. (2004). An English pronunciation learning system for Japanese students based on diagnosis of critical pronunciation errors. ReCALL, 16, 173–188.
Vandergriff, I. (2006). Negotiating common ground in computer-mediated versus face-to-face discussions. Language Learning & Technology, 10(1), 110–138. Retrieved July 19, 2007, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol10num1/vandergriff/default.html
Vinther, J. (2005). Cognitive processes at work in CALL. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 18, 251–271.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Ware, P., & Kramsch, C. (2005). Toward an intercultural stance: Teaching German and English through telecollaboration. Modern Language Journal, 89, 190–205.
Whyte, J. (2002). Virtual reality and the built environment. Oxford: Architectural Press.
Willis, J. (1996.) A framework for task-based learning. Harlow: Longman.
Winn, W. (1995). The Virtual Reality roving vehicle project. T H E Journal, 23(5), 70–74.
Winn, W., Hoffman, H., & Osberg, K. (1995). Semiotics and the design of objects, actions and interactions in virtual environments. Paper presented at the Symposium “Semiotics and cognition: Issues in the symbolic design of learning environments.” Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, April 22, 1995.
