Student Agency and Language-Learning Processes and Outcomes in International Online Environments
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v26i2.390-412Keywords:
Telecollaboration, I-CMC, Intercultural Communicative Competence, Agency, Sociocultural PerspectiveAbstract
This research focuses on the kinds of learning afforded by asynchronous international computer-mediated communication (I-CMC) among Japanese, Mexican, and Russian English language learners and the role of student agency in learning. To find learning evidence, the discourse analysis and content analysis of interaction protocols were conducted in two focal forums. These findings were triangulated through pre- and post- questionnaires and interviews. The discourse analysis of interaction protocols identified the communication moves potentially leading to learning (e.g., critical reflections, comparisons, and questions) and moves not leading to learning (e.g., phatic messages). The types of messages students produced, analyzed through content analysis, reflected their deep, strategic, or surface approaches to interaction and were closely tied to their degree of motivation and engagement with the project. Finally, the interviews identified seven recurrent themes, revealing students' learning perceptions that were tied to their local cultures-of-use of technologies and learning goals. The interview results were confirmed by pre- and post- questionnaire results. The study offers a discussion on how to bridge the ecological (open) and structured (task- or test-based) conceptualizations of learning and how to enhance development of intercultural communicative competence in global online environments.
References
Basharina, O. (2005). An activity system analysis of international telecollaboration: Contexts, contradictions and learning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of British Columbia.
Belz, J. (2002). Social dimensions of telecollaborative foreign language study. Language Learning & Technology, 6(1), 60-81. Retrieved October 16, 2008, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol6num1/belz/default.html
Belz, J. (2003). Linguistic perspectives on the development of intercultural competence in telecollaboration. Language Learning & Technology, 7(2), 68-117. Retrieved October 16, 2008, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol7num3/belz
Belz, J. A., & Thorne, S. L. (Eds.). (2006). Internet-mediated intercultural foreign language education. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
Byram, M. (1997). Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Carey, S. T. (1988). Communication as culture: Essays on media and society. London: Unwin Hyman.
Carey, S. T. (1999a). The use of WebCT for a highly interactive virtual graduate seminar. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 12, 371-380.
Carey, S. T. (1999b). Opening our minds to highly interactive ESL acquisition on the Internet. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Symposium on English Teaching (pp. 15-24). Taipei. The Crane Publishing Company, Ltd.
Cazden (1999). Socialization. In B. Spolsky (Ed.). Concise encyclopedia of educational linguistics (pp. 63-65). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Chapelle, C. A. (1997). CALL in the year 2000: Still in search of research paradigms? Language Learning & Technology, 1(1). Retrieved October 16, 2008, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol1num1/chapelle
Chapelle, C. A. (2001). Computer applications in second language acquisition:Foundations for teaching, testing and research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Crawford-Lange, L. & Lange, D. (1984). Doing the unthinkable in the second language classroom: A process for the integrating of language and culture. In T. Higgs (Ed.), Teaching for proficiency, the organizing principle (pp. 139-177). Lincolnwood, IL: National Textbook.
Erickson, T. (1999). Persistent conversation: An introduction. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 4(4). Retrieved October 30, 2008, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol4/issue4/ericksonintro.html
Guest, M. (2002). A critical “checkbook” for culture teaching and learning. ELT journal, 56, 154-161.
Hall, E. (1981). Beyond culture. New York: Anchor Books.
Harasim, L. (1990). Online education: An environment for collaboration and intellectual amplification. In L. Harasim (Ed.), Online education: Perspectives on a new environment (pp.39-66). New York: Praeger.
Harklau, L. (1999). Representing culture in the ESL writing classroom. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Culture in second language teaching and learning (pp. 109-135). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kern, R. (2006). Perspectives on technology in learning and teaching languages. TESOL Quarterly, 40, 183-210.
Kern, R., & Warschauer, M. (2000). Theory and practice of network-based language teaching. In M. Warschauer & R. Kern (Eds.), Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice (pp. 1-20). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kramsch, C., & Thorne, S. (2002). Foreign language learning as global communicative practice. In D. Block & D. Cameron (Eds.), Globalization and language teaching (pp. 93-101). London and New York: Routledge.
Kramsch, C., A’Ness, F., & Lam, E. (2000). Authenticity and authorship in the computer-mediated acquisition of L2 literacy. Language Learning & Technology, 4, 78-104. Retrieved February 4, 2003, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol4num2/kramsch
Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. London and New York: Routledge.
Lam Wan Shun, E. (2000). L2 literacy and the design of the self: A case study of a teenager writing on the Internet. TESOL Quarterly, 34, 457-482.
Lamy, M., & Goodfellow, R. (1999). Reflective conversation in the virtual language classroom. Language Learning & Technology, 2, 43-61. Retrieved October 16, 2008, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol2num2/article2
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Long, M. H. (1991). An introduction to second language acquisition research. New York: Longman.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mohan, B. (1985). Language and content. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Nardi, B. (1996). Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human- computer interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Norton, B., & Toohey, K. (2001). Changing perspectives on good language learners. TESOL Quarterly, 35, 307-322.
O’Dowd, R. (2003a). Understanding the “other side”: Intercultural learning in a Spanish-English e-mail exchange. Language Learning & Technology, 7(2), 118-144. Retrieved October 16, 2008, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol7num2/odowd/default.html
O’Dowd. R., & Eberbach, K. (2003b). Ireland and the Irish: Cultural studies online. Paper presented at the meeting of Eurocall, Limerick, Ireland. Retrieved July 20, 2003, from http://216.239.57.104/search?q=cache:kfyWyihqLRIJ:www3.unileon.es/personal/wwdfmrod/+eurocall+o%27dowd&hl=en
Pellettieri, J. (2000). Negotiation in cyberspace: The role of chatting in the development of grammatical competence. In M. Warschauer & R. Kern (Eds.), Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice (pp. 59-86). Cambridge University Press.
Rassool, N. (1999). Literacy for sustainable development in the age of information. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Safonova, V. (1996). Izuchenie yazikov mezhdunarodnogo obzsheniya v kontekste dialoga kul’tur i tsivilizatsiy [Learning languages of international communication within the context of dialogue of cultures and civilizations]. Voronezh: Istoki.
Sengupta, S. (2001). Exchanging ideas with peers in network-based classrooms: An aid or a pain? Language Learning & Technology, 5(1), 103-134. Retrieved October 30, 2008, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol5num1/sengupta/default.html
Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1995). Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: A step towards second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 16, 371-391.
Thorne, S. (2003). Artifacts and cultures-of-use in intercultural communication. Language Learning & Technology, 7(2), 38-67. Retrieved July 20, 2003, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol7num2/thorne
Thorpe, M. (2002). From independent learning to collaborative learning: New communities of practice in open, distance and distributed learning. In M. Lea & K. Nicoll (Eds.), Distributed learning: Social and cultural approaches to practice (pp. 131-151). Milton Keynes, UK: The Open University; London and New York: Routledge Falmer.
van Lier, L. (1996). Interaction in the language curriculum: Awareness, autonomy & authenticity. London: Longman.
van Lier, L. (2000). From input to affordance: Social-interactive learning from an ecological perspective. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 245-261). New York: Oxford University Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1934). revised and edited by Alex Kozulin (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Ware, P. D. (2005). “Missed” Communication in Online Communication: Tensions in a German-American Telecollaboration. Language Learning & Technology, 9, 64-89. Retrieved October 15, 2008, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol9num2/ware
Warschauer, M. (1999). Electronic literacies: Language, culture, and power in on-line education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice. Learning, meaning, and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
