Ready, steady, speak-online: Student training in the use of an online synchronous conferencing tool.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.30.2.226-251Keywords:
online language learning, video conferencing, online synchronous conferencing, learner trainingAbstract
With the increase of online language teaching the training needs of teachers have long been established and researched. However, the training needs of students have not yet been fully acknowledged. This paper focuses on learner training as preparation for language classes where online synchronous conferencing is used. It presents an action research cycle consisting of planning and conducting training sessions, analysing evaluative feedback, reflecting on changing needs, re-designing the provision and re-iterating the sessions. The research focuses on three iterations of the learner training conducted over a 21-month period, drawing on almost 500 completed student feedback responses.
The findings show that students considered the training sessions helpful in establishing how online language classes operate and gaining confidence to participate actively. Specifically they benefited from using their L1 to practise techniques for projecting their social presence in an online communicative situation, compensating for the lack of features such as body language, non-verbal communication, and spatial impressions. As for their teachers, the research demonstrated a need to reflect on the terminology used to explain CMC tools.
The article concludes with good-practice recommendations for the provision of learner training in online language classrooms.
References
Almeida d'Eça, T., & Gonzáles, D. (2006). Becoming a Webhead: Bridging the gap from classroom to blended or online learning. CALICO Journal, 23(3), 569-580.
Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing teacher presence in a computer conferencing context. JALN, 5(2), 1-17.
Baumann, U. (1999). Deutsch als Fremdsprache an der Open University. Zeitschrift für Interkulturellen Fremdsprachenunterricht, 4(1), 10 pp. Available at http://www.spz.tudarmstadt.de/projekt_ejournal/jg_04_1/beitrag/baumann1.htm
Baumann, U., Shelley, M., Murphy, L., & White, C. (2008). New challenges: The role of the tutor in the teaching of languages at a distance. Distances et savoirs, 6(3), 364-392. doi: 10.3166/ds.6.365-392
Beaven, M., Emke, M., Ernest, P., Germain-Rutherford, A., Hampel, R., Hopkins, J., Stanojevic, M., & Stickler, U. (2010). Needs and challenges for online language teachers – The ECML Project DOTS. Teaching English with Technology, 10(2), 5-20.
Bee Bee, S., & Gardner, D. (2012). Crossing the borders in language learning through the use of webconferencing as an e-learning tool. International Journal of Web Based Communities, 8(1), 120-132. doi: 10.1504/IJWBC.2012.044686
Berge, Z. L. (1995). Facilitating computer conferencing: Recommendations from the field. Educational Technology, 35(1), 22-30.
Buckingham Shum, S., Marshall, S., Brier, J., & Evans, T. (2001, January). Lyceum: Internet voice groupware for distance learning. Paper presented at the Euro-CSCL: 1st European Conference on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, Maastricht, NL.
Checkland, P., & Holwell, S. (1998). Action research: Its nature and validity. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 11(1), 9-21.
Cole, M. (2009). Using wiki technology to support student engagement: Lessons from the trenches. Computers & Education, 52(1), 141-146. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2008.07.003
Coleman, J. A., Hampel, R., Hauck, M., & Stickler, U. (2010). Collaboration and interaction: The keys to distance and computer-supported language learning. In G. S. Levine & A. Phipps (Eds.), Critical and intercultural theory and language pedagogy. Florence, KY: Cengage Learning.
Comas-Quinn, A. (2011). Learning to teach online or learning to become an online teacher: An exploration of teachers' experiences in a blended learning course. ReCALL, 23(3), 218-232. doi: 10.1017/S0958344011000152
Compton, L. K. (2009). Preparing language teachers to teach language online: A look at skills, roles, and responsibilities. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 22(1), 73-99. doi: 10.1080/09588220802613831
Crookes, G. (1993). Action research for second language teachers: Going beyond teacher research. Applied Linguistics, 14(2), 130-144. doi: 10.1093/applin/14.2.130
Duensing, A., Stickler, U., Batstone, C., & Heins, B. (2006). Face-to-face and online interactions — Is a task a task? Journal of Learning Design, 2(1), 34-44. doi: 10.5204/jld.v1i2.14
Ernest, P., Guitert Catasus, M., Hampel, R., Heiser, S., Hopkins, J., Murphy, L., & Stickler, U. (2012). Online teacher development: Collaborating in a virtual learning environment. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(3), 1-23. doi: 10.1080/09588221.2012.667814
Ernest, P., Heiser, S., & Murphy, L. (2013). Developing teacher skills to support collaborative online language learning. Language Learning Journal, 41, 1, 37-54. doi: 10.1080/09571736.2011.625095
Ernest, P., & Hopkins, J. (2006). Coordination and teacher development in an online learning environment. CALICO Journal, 23(3), 551-568.
Furnborough, C. (2012). Making the most of others: Autonomous interdependence in adult beginner distance language learners. Distance Education, 33(1), 99–116. doi: 10.1080/ 01587919.2012.667962
Glasersfeld, E. v. (2007). Key works in radical constructivism. Rotterdam / Taipei: Sense Publishers.
Guichon, N. (2009). Training future language teachers to develop online tutors’ competence through reflective analysis. ReCALL, 21(2), 166-185. doi: 10.1017/S0958344009000214
Gunawardena, C. N., & Zittle, F. J. (1997). Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer-mediated conferencing environment. American Journal of Distance Education, 11(3), 8-26. doi: 0.1080/08923649709526970
Hampel, R., & de los Arcos, B. (in press) Interacting at a distance: A critical review of the role of ICT in developing the learner–context interface in a university language programme. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching.
Hampel, R., & Hauck, M. (2004). Towards an effective use of audio conferencing in distance language courses. Language Learning and Technology, 8(1), 66-82.
Hampel, R., & Stickler, U. (2005). New skills for new classrooms: Training tutors to teach languages online. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 18(4), 311-326. doi: 10.1080/ 09588220500335455
Hampel, R., & Stickler, U. (2012). The use of videoconferencing to support multimodal interaction in an online language classroom. ReCALL, 24(2), 116-137. doi: 10.1017/S095834401200002X
Harasim, L. M. (1990). Online education: An environment for collaboration and intellectual amplification. In L. M. Harasim (Ed.), Online education (pp. 39-64). New York, Westport, London: Praeger.
Hassan, X., Hauger, D., Nye, G., & Smith, P. (2005). The use and effectiveness of synchronous audiographic conferencing in modern language teaching and learning (online language tuition): A systematic review of available research. Research Evidence in Education Library. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London.
Hauck, M., & Stickler, U. (2006). What does it take to teach online? CALICO Journal, 23(3), 463-476.
Hawkins, E. W. (1981). Modern languages in the curriculum. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Heins, B., Duensing, A., Stickler, U., & Batstone, C. (2007). Spoken interaction in online and face-toface language tutorials. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20(3), 279-295. doi: 10.1080/09588220701489440
Hurd, S. (2001). Managing and supporting language learners in open and distance learning environments. In M. Mozzon-McPherson & R. Vismans (Eds.), Beyond language teaching towards language advising (pp. 135-148). London, UK: CILT Publications.
Jeffrey, L., Hegarty, B., Kelly, O., Penman, M., Coburn, D., & McDonald, J. (2011). Developing digital information literacy in higher education: Obstacles and supports. Journal of Information Technology Education, 10, 383-413.
Kehrwald, B. (2008). Understanding social presence in text-based online learning environments. Distance Education, 29(1), 89-106. doi: 10.1080/01587910802004860
Kenning, M.-M. (2010). Differences that make the difference: A study of functionalities in synchronous CMC. ReCALL, 22(1), 3-19. doi: 10.1017/S0958344009990164
Lantolf, J. P. (2000). Introducing sociocultural theory. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 1-26). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Lewis, T. (2006). When teaching is learning: A personal account of learning to teach online. CALICO, Journal, 23(3), 581-601.
Lowenthal, P. R. (2010). The Evolution and Influence of Social Presence Theory on Online Learning. In T. T. Kidd (Ed.), Online Education and Adult Learning: New Frontiers for Teaching Practices (pp. 124-139). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
McDonough, K. (2006). Action research and the professional development of graduate teaching assistants. The Modern Language Journal, 90(1), 33-47. doi: 10.1111/j.15404781.2006.00383.x
Nicolson, M., Murphy, L., & Southgate, M. (Eds.). (2011). Language teaching in blended contexts. Edinburgh: Dunedin Academic Press.
Open University. (2010). 2009-2014 Curriculum Strategy, Senate, January 2010. Milton Keynes: The Open University.
Prawat, R. S., & Floden, R. E. (1994). Philosophical perspectives on constructivist views of learning. Educational Psychologist, 29(1), 37-48. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep2901_4
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1-6. doi: 10.1108/ 10748120110424816
Rosell-Aguilar, F. (2006). Online tutorial support in open distance learning through audio-graphic SCMC: Tutor impressions. JALT-CALL Journal, 2(2), 37–52.
Salmon, G. (2004). E-moderating: The key to online teaching and learning. Oxford, UK: Routledge.
Satar, H. M. (2010). Social presence in online multimodal communication: A framework to analyse online interactions between language learners (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The Open University, Milton Keynes.
Shield, L., Hauck, M., & Hewer, S. (2001). Talking to strangers - The role of the tutor in developing target language speaking skills at a distance. In A. Kazeroni (Ed.), Proceedings of Untélè 2000 (pp. 75-84). France: Technological University of Compiegne.
Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. London: John Wiley & Sons.
Stickler, U., Batstone, C., Duensing, A., & Heins, B. (2004). Distance and virtual distance: Preliminary results of a study of interaction patterns in synchronous audio graphic CMC and face-to-face tutorials in beginners' language tutorials. Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Applied Linguistics and Language Teaching (pp. 740-750). Beijing and Shanghai: University of Northern Iowa.
Stickler, U., Batstone, C., Duensing, A., & Heins, B. (2007). Distant classmates: Speech and silence in online and telephone language tutorials. European Journal of Open and Distance Learning (EURODL), II. Available at http://www.eurodl.org/?p=archives&year=2007& halfyear=2& article=277
Stickler, U., Ernest, P., Beaven, T., Emke, M., Germain-Rutherford, A., Hampel, R., Hopkins, J., & Stanojevic, M.-M. (2010). Introduction to the special issue of teaching English with technology. Teaching English with Technology, 10(2), n.p.
Stickler, U., & Hampel, R. (2010). CyberDeutsch: Language production and user preferences in a Moodle VLE. CALICO Journal, 28(1), 49-73.
Stockwell, G. (2007). A review of technology choice for teaching language skills and areas in the CALL literature. ReCALL, 19, 105-120. doi: 10.1017/S0958344007000225
Thomas, P., Carswell, L., Price, B., & Petre, M. (1998). A holistic approach to supporting distance learning using the internet: Transformation, not translation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 29, 149–161.
Thorne, S. L. (2003). Artifacts and cultures-of-use in intercultural communication. Language Learning & Technology, 7(2), 38-67.
van Deursen, A. J., van Dijk, J. A., & Peters, O. (2011). Rethinking internet skills: The contribution of gender, age, education, internet experience, and hours online to medium-and content-related Internet skills. Poetics, 39(2), 125-144. doi: 10.1016/j.poetic.2011.02.001
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wang, Y. (2004). Distance language learning: Interactive fourth-generation internet-based videoconferencing. CALICO Journal, 21(2), 373-395.
Wang, Y., & Chen, N.-S. (2007). Online synchronous language learning: SLMS over the internet. Innovate, 3(3), 8 pages. Available at http://innovateonline.info/pdf/vol3_ issue3/Online_Synchronous_Language_Learning-__SLMS_over_the_Internet.pdf
Wang, Y., & Chen, N.-S. (2009). Criteria for evaluating synchronous learning management system: Arguments from the distance language classroom. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 22(1), 1-18. doi: 10.1080/09588220802613773
Wang, Y., Chen, N.-S., & Levy, M. (2010). Teacher training in a synchronous cyber face-to-face classroom: Characterizing and supporting the online teachers' learning process. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23(4), 277-293. doi: 10.1080/09588221.2010.493523
Wertsch, J. V. (2007). Mediation. In H. Daniels, M. Cole & J. V. Wertsch (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Vygotsky (pp. 178-192). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wertsch, J. V., & Tulviste, P. (1992). L. S.Vygotsky and contemporary developmental psychology. Developmental Psychology, 28(4), 548-557. doi: 10.1037//0012-1649.28.4.548
Yamada, M., & Akahori, K. (2007). Social presence in synchronous CMC-based language learning: How does it affect the productive performance and consciousness of learning objectives? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20(1), 37-65. doi: 10.1080/09588220601118503
Yamada, M., & Akahori, K. (2009). Awareness and performance through self- and partner’s image in videoconferencing. CALICO Journal, 27(1), 1–25.
