Comparison of the Effectiveness of a CALL-Based Approach and a Card-Based Approach to Vocabulary Acquisition and Retention

Authors

  • Andrew Oberg

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.29.1.118-144

Keywords:

Vocabulary Learning, CALL, Picture Cards, Short-term Memory, Long-term Memory

Abstract

In this study, two study methods for the support of acquisition and retention of 10 vocabulary items were compared; one method used representative picture cards and the other a CALL interface. Seventy-one first-year Japanese university students comprising two classes participated in the study. The students studied a practice set of 10 vocabulary items using both of the two methods and then a treatment set of 10 different items using only one of the methods to which the students were randomly assigned. A t test done on the groups' vocabulary pretest scores showed no significant difference between the two groups in terms of knowledge of the items at the outset of the experiment. The analysis of the posttreatment data showed no significant difference between the groups. Finally, a posttreatment survey revealed a slight preference for the CALL method among the students.

References

Baddeley, A. D. (1997). Human memory: Theory and practice (rev. ed.). East Sussex, UK: Psychology Press.

Bahrick, H. P., Bahrick, L. E., Bahrick, A. S., & Bahrick, P. E. (1993). Maintenance of foreign language vocabulary and the spacing effect. Psychological Science, 4, 316-321.

Boers, F. (2000). Metaphor awareness and vocabulary retention. Applied Linguistics, 21, 553-571.

Chapelle, C. (2001). Computer applications in second language acquisition: Foundations for teaching, testing and research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Chun, D. M., & Payne, J. S. (2004). What makes students click: Working memory and look-up behavior. System, 32, 481-503.

Cowan, N. (2000). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 87-114.

Desmet, P., & Paulussen, H. (2007). CorpusCALL: Challenges and opportunities. In S. Granger (Ed.), Kaleidoscope: Optimizing the role of language in technology-enhanced learning, Louvain-laNeuve, Belgium, 4-5 October 2007 (pp. 9-11). Retrieved from www.uclouvain.be/cps/ucl/doc/adri/documents/GRANGER-SYLVIANE-2007.pdf

Ellis, N., & Beaton, A. (1993). Factors affecting the learning of foreign language vocabulary: Imagery keyword mediators and phonological short-term memory. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 46, 533-558.

Ellis, N. C. (1995). The psychology of foreign language vocabulary acquisition: Implications for CALL. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 8, 103-128.

Ellis, N. C., & Sinclair, S. G. (1996). Working memory in the acquisition of vocabulary and syntax: Putting language in good order. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 49, 234-250.

Ericsson, K. A., & Kintsch, W. (1994). Long-term working memory (Technical Report #94-01). Boulder, CO: Institute of Cognitive Science, University of Colorado at Boulder. Retrieved from http://ics.colorado.edu/techpubs/pdf/94-01.pdf

Grace, C. (1998). Personality type, tolerance of ambiguity, and vocabulary retention in CALL. CALICO Journal, 15, 19-45. Retrieved from https://www.calico.org/memberBrowse.php?action=article&id=440

Gupta, P., & MacWhinney, B. (1997). Vocabulary acquisition and verbal short-term memory: Computational and neural bases. Brain and Language, 59, 267-333.

Henriksen, B. (1999). Three dimensions of vocabulary development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 303-317.

Holliday, L. (1999). Theory and research: Input, interaction, and CALL. In J. Egbert & E. Hanson-Smith (Ed.), CALL environments: Research, practice, and critical issues, (pp. 181-188). Bloomington, IL: Pantagraph Printing.

Hulstijn, J. (2001). Intentional and incidental second language vocabulary learning: A reappraisal of elaboration, rehearsal, and automaticity. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 258-286). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Knowles, L. (2008). Mind blocks. Language, 7, 28-34.

Laufer, B. (1998). The development of passive and active vocabulary in a second language: Same or different? Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19, 255-271.

Lewis, M. (1993). The lexical approach: The state of ELT and a way forward. London: Heinle Cengage Learning.

McNeill, A. (1996). Vocabulary knowledge profiles: Evidence from Chinese-speaking ESL teachers. Hong Kong Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1, 39-63.

Meara, P. (1996). The vocabulary knowledge framework. Retrieved from http://www.lognostics.co.uk/vlibrary/meara1996c.pdf

Meara, P., & Fitzpatrick, T. (2000). Lex30: An improved method of assessing productive vocabulary in an L2. System, 28, 19-30.

Mizuno, R. (1996). Bunsankouka: Tenbouto aratana setsuno teian [Theories of spacing effects: Review and proposal of a new theory]. Bulletin of the Shizuoka Institute of Science and Technology, 5, 181-197.

Mizuno, R. (2003). Gakusyukoukano ninchishinrigaku [The cognitive psychology of learning effects]. Kyoto: Nakanishiya Publishing.

Mohseni-Far, M. (2008a). In search of the best technique for vocabulary acquisition. Estonian Papers in Applied Linguistics, 4, 121-138.

Mohseni-Far, M. (2008b). A cognitively oriented encapsulation of strategies utilized for lexical development: In search of a flexible and highly interactive curriculum. Porta Linguarum, 9, 35-52.

Mondria, J.-A., & Mondria-de Vries, S. (1994). Efficiently memorizing words with the help of word cards and ‘hand computer’: Theory and applications. System, 22, 47-57.

Nakata, T. (2006). Implementing optimal spaced learning for English vocabulary learning: Towards improvement of the low-first method derived from the reactivation theory. JALT CALL Journal, 2, 19-36.

Nakata, T. (2008). English vocabulary learning with word lists, word cards, and computers: Implications from cognitive psychology research for optimal spaced learning. ReCALL, 20, 3-20.

Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nation, P. (2005). Teaching vocabulary. Asian EFL Journal, 7(3). Retrieved from http://www.asian-efljournal.com/sept_05_pn.pdf

Nattinger, J. R., & DeCarrico, J. S. (1992). Lexical phrases and language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Nikolova, O. R. (2002). Effects of students’ participation in authoring of multimedia materials on student acquisition of vocabulary. Language Learning & Technology, 6(1), 100-122. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/vol6num1/nikolova/default.html

O’Brien, M. (1994). Intelligent computer assisted language learning. In M. Ito (Ed.), Research reports of Suzuka University of Medical Science and Technology, 1:19940501 (pp. 167-174). Suzuka City, Japan: Suzuka University of Medical Science and Technology Press.

Papagno, C., & Vallar, G. (1992). Phonological short-term memory and the learning of novel words: The effect of phonological similarity and item length. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 44, 47-67.

Pemperton, R. (2007). Planning a smart phone system to support self-directed L2 vocabulary learning. In S. Granger (Ed.), Kaleidoscope: Optimizing the role of language in technology-enhanced learning, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium, 4-5 October 2007 (pp. 45-47). Retrieved from www.uclouvain.be/cps/ucl/doc/adri/documents/GRANGER-SYLVIANE-2007.pdf

Schmitt, N., & Schmitt, D. (1995). Vocabulary notebooks: Theoretical underpinnings and practical suggestions. ELT Journal, 49, 133-143.

Schmitt, N. (2000). Vocabulary in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Segler, T. M. (2002). Second language vocabulary acquisition and learning strategies in ICALL environments. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 15, 409-422.

Son, J.-B. (2001). CALL and vocabulary learning: A review. English Linguistic Science, 7, 27-35.

Waring, R. (2004). In defence of learning words in word pairs: But only when doing it the ‘right’ way! Retrieved from http://www1.harenet.ne.jp/~waring/vocab/principles/systematic_learning.htm

Wei, M. (2007). An examination of vocabulary learning of college-level learners of English in China. Asian EFL Journal, 9(2), 93-114. Retrieved from http://www.asian-efl-journal.com/June_07_mw.php

Weil, N. (2008). Vocabulary size, background characteristics, and reading skill of Korean intensive English students. Asian EFL Journal, 10(4), 26-59. Retrieved from http://www.asian-efl-journal.com/December_08_nw.php

Wible, D., Kuo, C.-H., Chen, M.-C., Tsao, N.-L., & Hung, T.-F. (2006). A computational approach to the discovery and representation of lexical chunks. In P. Mertens (Ed.),TALN 2006 (pp. 868-875). Louvain-le-Neuve, Belgium: Presses universitaires de Louvain.

Woods, A., Fletcher, P, & Hughes, A. (1986). Statistics in language studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Yoshii, M., & Flaitz, J. (2002). Second language incidental vocabulary retention: The effect of text and picture annotation types. CALICO Journal, 20, 33-58. Retrieved from https://www.calico.org/memberBrowse.php?action=article&id=400

Downloads

Published

2013-01-14

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Oberg, A. (2013). Comparison of the Effectiveness of a CALL-Based Approach and a Card-Based Approach to Vocabulary Acquisition and Retention. CALICO Journal, 29(1), 118-144. https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.29.1.118-144

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >>