Computer Assisted Pronunciation Training

Targeting Second Language Vowel Perception Improves Pronunciation

Authors

  • Ron I. Thomson

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.28.3.744-765

Keywords:

Computer Assisted Pronunciation Training, L2 Speech Perception and Production, High Variability Phonetic Training

Abstract

This paper first provides an overview of factors that constrain ultimate attainment in adult second language (L2) pronunciation, finding that first language influence and the quantity and quality of L2 phonetic input account for much of the variation in the degree of foreign accent found across adult L2 learners. The author then evaluates current approaches to computer assisted pronunciation training (CAPT), concluding that they are not well grounded in a current understanding of L2 accent. Finally, the author reports on a study in which twenty-two Mandarin speakers were trained to better discriminate ten Canadian English vowels. Using a specially designed computer application, learners were randomly presented with recordings of the target vowels in monosyllabic frames, produced by twenty native speakers. The learners responded by clicking on one of ten salient graphical images representing each vowel category and were given both visual and auditory feedback as to the accuracy of their selections. Pre- and post-tests of the learners’ English vowel pronunciation indicated that their vowel intelligibility significantly improved as a result of training, not only in the training context, but also in an untrained context. In a third context, vowel intelligibility did not improve.

References

Anderson-Hsieh, J. (1994). Interpreting visual feedback on English suprasegmentals in computer assisted pronunciation instruction. CALICO Journal, 11(4), 5-22.

Baker, W., & Trofimovich, P. (2006). Perceptual paths to accurate production of L2 vowels: The role of individual differences. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching (IRAL), 44(3), 231-250.

Bent, T., Bradlow, A. R., & Smith, B. L. (2007). Segmental errors in different word positions and their effects on intelligibility of non-native speech: All's well that begins well. In O.-S. Bohn & M. J. Munro (Eds.), Second-language speech learning: The role of language experience in speech perception and production: A festschrift in honour of James E. Flege (pp. 331-347). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Birdsong, D. (2007). Nativelike pronunciation among late learners of French as a second language. In O.-S. Bohn & M. J. Munro (Eds.), Second-language speech learning: The role of language experience in speech perception and production: A festschrift in honour of James E. Flege (pp. 99-116). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Bongaerts, T., van Summeren, C., Planken, B., & Schils, E. (1997). Age and ultimate attainment in the pronunciation of a foreign language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 447-465.

Borden, G., Gerber, A., & Milsark, G. (1983). Production and perception of the /r/-/l/ contrast in Korean adults learning English. Language Learning, 33, 499-526.

Bradlow, A. R. (2008) Training non-native language sound patterns: Lessons from training Japanese adults on the English /r/-/l/ contrast. In J. G. Hansen Edwards & M. L. Zampini (Eds.), Stateof-the-art issues in second language phonology (pp. 287-308). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Bradlow, A. R., Pisoni, D. B., Akahane-Yamada, R., & Tohkura, Y. (1997). Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: Some effects of perceptual learning on speech production. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 101, 2299-2310.

Chapelle, C. A. (2001). Computer applications in second language acquisition: Foundations for teaching, testing and research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Corder, S. P. (1971). Idiosyncratic errors and error analysis. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 9, 147-159.

Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J. (2005). Second language accent and pronunciation teaching: A research-based approach. TESOL Quarterly, 39, 379-397.

Derwing, T. M., Munro, M. J., & Carbonaro, M. (2000). Does popular speechrecognition software work with ESL speech? TESOL Quarterly, 34, 592-603

Eskenazi, M. (1999). Using a computer in foreign language pronunciation training: What advantages? CALICO Journal, 16(3), 447-469. Available at https://calico.org/journalTOC.php

Flege, J. E. (1995). Second-language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Theoretical and methodological issues (pp. 229-273). Timonium, MD: York Press.

Flege, J. E., Bohn, O., & Jang, S. (1997). Effects of experience on non-native speakers' production and perception of English vowels. Journal of Phonetics, 25(4), 437-470.

Flege, J. E., Frieda, E. M., & Nozawa, T. (1997). Amount of native-language (L1) use affects the pronunciation of an L2. Journal of Phonetics, 25, 169-186.

Flege, J. E., Munro, M. J., & MacKay, I. R. A. (1995). Factors affecting strength of perceived foreign accent in a second language. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 3125-3134.

Gottfried, T. L., & Suiter, T. L. (1997). Effect of linguistic experience on the identification of Mandarin Chinese vowels and tones. Journal of Phonetics, 25, 207-231.

Guion, S. G., & Pederson, E. (2007). Investigating the role of attention in phonetic learning. In O.-S. Bohn & M. J. Munro (Eds.), Second-language speech learning: The role of language experience in speech perception and production: A festschrift in honour of James E. Flege (pp. 57-77). Amsterdam: John Benjamins

Hansen, T. K. (2006). Computer assisted pronunciation training: The four ‘K’s of feedback. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Multimedia Information Communication Technologies in Education, 342-346.

Hardison, D. M. (2004). Generalization of computer-assisted prosody training: Quantitative and qualitative findings. Language Learning and Technology, 8(1), 34-52. Available at http://llt.msu.edu/vol8mum1/hardison/default.html

Hardison, D. M. (2005). Contextualized computer-based L2 prosody training: Evaluating the effects of discourse context and video input. CALICO Journal, 22(2), 175-190. Available at https://calico.org/journalTOC.php

Hincks, R. (2003). Speech technologies for pronunciation feedback and evaluation. ReCALL, 15(1), 3-20.

Iverson, P., Hazan, V., & Banister, K. (2005). Phonetic training with acoustic cue manipulations: A comparison of methods for teaching English /r/-/l/ to Japanese adults. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 118, 3267-3278.

Joseph, S. R. H., & Uther, M. (2009). Mobile devices for language learning: Multimedia approaches. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 4(1), 7-32

Lado, R. (1957). Linguistics across cultures. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Lambacher, S., Martens, W., Kakehi, K., Marasinghe, C., & Molholt, G. (2005). The effects of identification training on the identification and production of American English vowels by native speakers of Japanese. Applied Psycholinguistics, 26, 227-247.

Lee, J. G., Cadierno, T., Glass, W. R., & VanPatten, B. (1997). The effects of lexical and grammatical cues on processing past temporal reference in second language input. Applied Language Learning, 8, 1-23.

Lenneberg, E. (1967). Biological foundations of language. New York: Wiley.

Lively, S. E., Logan, J. S., & Pisoni, D. B. (1993). Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/ II: The role of phonetic environment and talker variability in learning new perceptual categories. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 94, 1242-1255.

Lively, S. E., Pisoni, D. B., Yamada, R., Tokhura, Y., & Yamada, T. (1994). Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/ III. Long-term retention of new phonetic categories. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 96, 2076-2087.

Logan, J. S., Lively, S. E., & Pisoni, D. B. (1991). Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and / l /: A first report. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89, 874 -866.

McClelland, J. L., Fiez, J. A., & McCandliss, B. D. (2002). Teaching the non-native [r]-[l] speech contrast to Japanese adults: Training methods, outcomes, and neural basis. Physiology and Behavior, 77, 657-662.

Mich, O., Neri, A., & Giuliani, D. (2006). The effectiveness of a computer assisted pronunciation training system for young foreign language learners. Proceedings from CALL 2006. Antwerp, Belgium, 135-143.

Moyer, A. (2009). Input as a critical means to an end: Quantity and quality of experience in L2 phonological attainment. In T. Piske and M. Young-Scholten (Eds), Input matters in SLA (pp. 159-174). New York: Multilingual Matters.

Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M. (2008). Segmental acquisition in adult ESL learners: A longitudinal study of vowel production. Language Learning, 58, 479-502.

Neri, A., Cucchiarini, C., & Strik, H. (2006a). ASR corrective feedback on pronunciation: Does it really work? Proceedings from ICSLP 2006 (pp. 1982-1985). Pittsburgh, USA.

Neri, A., Cucchiarini, C., & Strik, H. (2006b). Selecting segmental errors in L2 Dutch for optimal pronunciation training. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 44, 357–404.

Neri, A., Cucchiarini, C., & Strik, H. (2008). The effectiveness of computer-based speech corrective feedback for improving segmental quality in L2 Dutch. ReCALL, 20(2), 225-243.

Neri, A., Cucchiarini, C., Strik, H., & Boves, L. (2002). The pedagogy-technology interface in computer assisted pronunciation training. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 15, 441–467.

Nishi, K., & Kewley-Port, D. (2007). Training Japanese listeners to perceive American English vowels: Influence of training sets. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50, 1496-1509.

Nishi, K., & Kewley-Port, D. (2008). Nonnative speech perception training using vowel subsets: Effects of vowels in sets and order of training. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 51, 1480-1493.

Patkowski, M. (1990). Age and accent in a second language: A reply to James Emil Flege. Applied Linguistics, 11, 73-89.

Pennington, M. C. (1999). Computer-aided pronunciation pedagogy: Promise, limitations, directions. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 12, 427-440.

Piske, T., MacKay, I. R. A., & Flege, J. E. (2001). Factors affecting degree of foreign accent in an L2: A review. Journal of Phonetics, 29, 191-215.

Scovel, T. (1988). A time to speak. A psycholinguistic inquiry into the critical period for human speech. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

Secan, M. E. (1990). The anxiety over technology (and why I like computers anyway.) CALICO Journal, 8(2), 41-47. Available at https://calico.org/journalTOC.php

Seferoğlu, G. (2005). Improving students' pronunciation through accent reduction software. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(2), 303-316.

Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 10, 209-231.

Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson. (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction. (pp. 3-32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Stenson, N., Downing, B., Smith, J., & Smith, K. (1992). The effectiveness of computer-assisted pronunciation training. CALICO Journal, 9(4), 5-19. Available at https://calico.org/journalTOC.php

Strange, W. (2007). Cross-language similarity of vowels: Theoretical and methodological issues. In O.-S. Bohn & M. J. Munro (Eds.), Second-language speech learning: The role of language experience in speech perception and production: A festschrift in honour of James E. Flege (pp. 35-55). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Strange, W., Akahane-Yamada, R., Kubo, R., Trent, S. A., Nishi, K. (2001). Effects of consonantal context on the perceptual assimilation of American English vowels by Japanese listeners Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 109, 1691-1704.

Thomson, R. I. (2005). English vowel learning by speakers of Mandarin. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 117, 2400.

Thomson, R. I. (2007). Modeling L1/L2 interactions in the perception and production of English vowels by Mandarin L1 speakers: A training study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta.

Thomson, R. I. (2008). L2 English vowel learning by Mandarin speakers: Does perception precede production? Canadian Acoustics, 36(3), 134-135. Proceedings of the annual conference of the Canadian Acoustics Association. Vancouver, BC.

Thomson, R. I., & Isaacs, T. (2009). Within-category variation in L2 English vowel learning. Canadian Acoustics, 37(3), 138-139. Proceedings of the annual conference of the Canadian Acoustics Association. Niagara-on-the-Lake, ON.

Thomson, R. I., Nearey, T. M., & Derwing, T. M. (2009) A statistical approach to measuring the crosslinguistic similarity of Mandarin and English vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 126, 1447-1460.

Uther, M., Uther, J., Athanasopoulos, P., Singh, P., & Akahane-Yamada, R. (2007). Mobile adaptive CALL (MAC). A lightweight speech-based intervention for mobile language learners. Proceedings of Interspeech 2007 Conference. Antwerp, Belgium.

Walley, A. C., & Flege, J. E. (1999). Effect of lexical status on children's and adults' perception of native and non-native vowels. Journal of Phonetics, 27(3), 307-332.

Wang, Y. P. (2004) Distance language learning: Interactivity and fourth generation Internet-based videoconferencing. CALICO Journal, 21(2), 373-395. Available at https://calico.org/journalTOC.php

Yamada, R. E. (1995). Age and acquisition of second language speech sounds perception of American English /r/ and /l/ by native speakers of Japanese. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception in linguistic experience: Theoretical and methodological issues (pp. 305-319). Timonium, MD: York Press.

Downloads

Published

2013-01-14

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Thomson, R. I. (2013). Computer Assisted Pronunciation Training: Targeting Second Language Vowel Perception Improves Pronunciation. CALICO Journal, 28(3), 744-765. https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.28.3.744-765

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >>