Computer-mediated Scaffolding in L2 Students' Academic Literacy Development
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.28.1.74-98Keywords:
Computer-mediated Communication (CMC), Scaffolding, Academic Literacy, Nonnative-speaking (NNS) Students, InteractionAbstract
Learning to perform academic writing in university content classrooms is a major challenge facing nonnative-English-speaker (NNS) students. Computer-mediated communication (CMC) offers new possibilities for bidirectional peer-to-peer scaffolding in which students interact and negotiate meaning concerning academic writing and thus represents a new pathway to academic literacy development. This case study examined how CMC influenced a group of NNS graduate students' development of academic literacy in applied linguistics courses. Data were gathered from multiple sources: questionnaires, online discussion posts, students' written assignments, and general as well as discourse-based interviews. The data were analyzed qualitatively using different methods and allowed substantial data triangulation. Results of the data analysis indicated that CMC allowed two-way collective scaffolding, which played an important role in facilitating the participants' development of academic literacy skills. Specifically, computer-mediated collective scaffolding helped the participants orient themselves to the writing tasks, provided them with opportunities to rehearse writing and negotiate revisions of writing, and allowed them to develop an understanding of academic citation conventions.
References
Aljaafreh, A., & Lantolf, J. P. (1994). Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the zone of proximal development. The Modern Language Journal, 78, 465-483.
Beauvois, M. H. (1992). Computer-assisted classroom discussion in the foreign language classroom: Conversation in slow motion. Foreign Language Annals, 25, 455-464.
Belcher, D. (1994). The apprenticeship approach to advanced academic literacy: Graduate students and their mentors. English for Specific Purposes, 13, 23-34.
Berkenkotter, C., & Huckin, T. N. (1995). Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication: Cognition/culture/power. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Berkenkotter, C., Huckin, T. N., & Ackerman, J. (1991). Social contexts and socially constructed texts: The initiation of a graduate student into a writing research community. In C. Bazerman & J. Paradis (Eds.), Textual dynamics of the professions: Historical and contemporary studies of writing in academic and other professional communities (pp. 191-215). Madison: University of
Wisconsin Press.
Casanave, C. P. (1995). Local interactions: Constructing contexts for composing in a graduate sociology program. In D. Belcher & G. Braine (Eds.), Academic writing in a second language: Essays on research and pedagogy (pp. 83-110). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
Chun, D. M. (1994). Using computer networking to facilitate the acquisition of interactive competence. System, 22, 17-31.
Chun, D. M. (1998). Using computer-assisted class discussion to facilitate the acquisition of interactive competence. In J. Swaffar, S. Romano, P. Markley, & K. Arens (Eds.), Language learning online: Theory and practice in the ESL and L2 computer classroom (pp. 57-80). Austin, TX: Labyrinth Publications.
Donato, R. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In J. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 33-56). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
Donato, R. (2000). Sociocultural contributions to understanding the foreign and second language classroom. In J. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 27-50). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dong, Y. R. (1996). Learning how to use citations for knowledge transformation: Non-native doctoral students’ dissertation writing in science. Research in the Teaching of English, 30, 428–457.
Dudley-Evans, T. (1991). Socialization into the academic community: Linguistic and stylistic expectations of a Ph.D. thesis as revealed by supervisor comments. In P. Adams, B. Heaton, & P. Howarth (Eds.), Socio-cultural issues in English for academic purposes (pp. 41-51). London: Macmillan.
Gall, M., Gall, J., & Borg, W. (2003). Educational research: An introduction (7th ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman Publishers.
Goetz, J. P., & LeCompte, M. D. (1981). Ethnographic research and the problem of data reduction. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 12, 51-70.
Kelm, O. R. (1992). The use of synchronous computer networks in second language instruction: A preliminary report. Foreign Language Annals, 25, 441-454.
Kern, R. G. (1995). Restructuring classroom interaction with networked computers: Effects on quantity and characteristics of language production. Modern Language Journal, 79, 457-476.
Lee, L. (2008). Focus-on-form through collaborative scaffolding in expert-to-novice online interaction. Language Learning & Technology, 12(3), 53-72. Retrieved October 3, 2009, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol12num3/lee
Li, Y. (2006). A doctoral student of physics writing for publication: A sociopolitically oriented case study. English for Specific Purposes, 25, 456-478.
Mercer, N. (1995). The guided construction of knowledge. Talk amongst teachers and learners. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Miller, C. R. (1984). Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70, 151-167.
Odell, L., Goswami, D., & Herrington, A. (1983). The discourse-based interview: A procedure for exploring the tacit knowledge of writers in non-academic settings. In P. Mosenthal, L. Tamor, & S. Walmsley (Eds.), Research on writing (pp. 221-236). New York: Longman.
Ohta, A. (2000). Rethinking interaction in SLA: Developmentally appropriate assistance in the zone of proximal development and the acquisition of L2 grammar. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 97-114). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Oskoz, A. (2005). Students’ dynamic assessment via online chat. CALICO Journal, 22, 513-536. Retrieved October 3, 2009, from https://calico.org/page.php?id=5
Parkinson, J., Jackson, L., Kirkwood, T., & Padayachee, V. (2007). A scaffolded reading and writing course for foundation level science students. English for Specific Purposes, 26, 443-461.
Prior, P. (1991). Contextualizing writing and response in a graduate seminar. Written Communication, 8, 267-310.
Sullivan, N., & Pratt, E. (1996). A comparative study of two ESL writing environments: A computerassisted classroom and a traditional oral classroom. System, 29, 491-501.
Swain, M. (2000). The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 97-114). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Warschauer, M. (1996). Comparing face-to-face and electronic communication in the second language classroom. CALICO Journal, 13, 7-26. Retrieved October 3, 2009, from https://calico.org/page.php?id=5
Wood, D. J., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychiatry and Psychology, 17, 89-100.
Woodward-Kron, R. (2007). Negotiating meanings and scaffolding learning: Writing support for nonEnglish speaking background postgraduate students. Higher Education Research & Development, 26, 253-268.
