Learners' Feedback in Online Chats

What Does It Reveal about Students' Learning?

Authors

  • Ana Oskoz

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.27.1.48-68

Keywords:

Synchronous Computer-Mediated Communication (SCMC), Feedback, Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD), Learner-Learner Interaction, Microgenetic Growth

Abstract

Learners engaged in synchronous computer-mediated communication (SCMC) work collaboratively to construct knowledge by providing each other with implicit and explicit feedback. In addition to its value in encouraging learners to make modifications toward target-like forms, the implicitness or explicitness of the feedback provides a means to understand the individual learner's language development (Aljaafreh & Lantolf, 1994). Being that microgenetic growth results from learners who provide each other with gradual and contingent help in face-to-face interactions (Ohta, 2000), it would be of interest to learn if such gradual and contingent help appears in SCMC with the same positive effects. Thus, this study explores two questions: (a) To what extent do learners in SCMC engage in similar patterns of assistance to those used in face-to-face interactions between students? (b) To what extent does microgenetic growth occur as a result of learner-learner interactions?

For this study, two full classes of Intermediate Spanish I students were selected. Students were placed in pairs (plus two triads) and participated in a series of tasks as a part of their assigned class work. The researcher analyzed the discussion transcripts, identified different moments of assistance, and examined the data for instances of microgenetic growth. The results of this study suggest that, although learners did indeed provide each other with gradual and contingent feedback and, in some instances, showed microgenetic growth, neither were as apparent as those found in face-to-face interactions.

References

Aljaafreh, A., & Lantolf, J. P. (1994). Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the zone of proximal development. Modern Language Review, 78, 465-483.

Antón, M., & DiCamilla, F. (1998). Socio-cognitive functions of L1 collaborative interaction in the L2 classroom. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 54, 314-342.

Antón, M., DiCamilla, F., & Lantolf, J. (2003). Sociocultural theory and the acquisition of Spanish as a second language. In B. Lafford & R. Salaberry (Eds.), Spanish second language acquisition. State of the science (pp. 262-284). Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press.

Beauvois, M. (1994). E-talk: Attitudes and motivation in computer-assisted classroom discussion. Computers and the Humanities, 28, 177-190.

Beauvois, M. (1997). High-tech, high-touch: From discussion to composition in the net-worked classroom. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 10, 57-69.

Beauvois, M. (1998). Conversations in slow motion: Computer-mediated communication in the foreign language classroom. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 54, 198-217.

Blake, R. (2000). Computer-mediated communication: A window on L2 Spanish interlanguage. Language Learning & Technology, 4(1), 120-136. Retrieved April 25, 2005, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol4num1/blake/default.html

Chaiklin, S. (2003). The zone of proximal development in Vygostky’s analysis of learning and instruction. In A. Kozulin, B. Gindis, V. Ageyev, & S. Miller (Eds.), Vygostky’s educational theory in cultural context (pp. 39-64). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Chun, D. (1994). Using computer networking to facilitate the acquisition of interactive competence. System, 22, 17-31.

Cononelos, T., & Oliva, M. (1993). Using computer networks to enhance foreign language culture education. Foreign Language Annals, 26, 525-534.

Darhower, M. (2002). Interactional features of synchronous computer-mediated communication in the intermediate L2 class: A sociocultural case study. CALICO Journal, 19, 249-277. Retrieved June 21, 2009, from https://calico.org/page.php?id=5

DiCamilla, F., & Antón, M. (1997). Repetition in the collaborative discourse of L2 learners: A Vygotskian perspective. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 53, 609-633.

Donato, R. (1994). Collective scaffolding on second language learning. In J. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 33-56). Westport, CT: Ablex.

Donato, R. (2000). Sociocultural contributions to understanding the foreign and second language classroom. In J. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language acquisition (pp. 27-50). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Fernández-García, M., & Martínez-Arbelaiz, A. (2002). Negotiation of meaning in non-native speaker synchronous discussions. CALICO Journal, 19, 279-294. Retrieved June 21, 2009, from https://calico.org/page.php?id=5

Fidalgo-Eick, M. (2001). Synchornous on-line negotiation of meaning by intermediate learners of Spanish. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa, Iowa City.

Frawley, W. (1997). Vygotsky and cognitive science: Language and the unification of the social and computational mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Iwashita, N. (2003). Negative feedback and positive evidence in task-based interaction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 1-30.

Kelm, O. (1992). The use of synchronous computer networks in second language instruction: A preliminary report. Foreign Language Annals, 25, 441-445.

Kelm, O. (1996). The application of computer networks in foreign language education: Focusing on principles of second language acquisition. In M. Warschauer (Ed.), Telecollaboration in foreign language learning (pp. 19-28). Manoa, HI: University of Hawai’i Press.

Kern, R. (1995). Restructuring classroom interaction with networked computers: Effects on quantity and characteristics of language production. Modern Language Journal, 79, 457-476.

Kinginger, C. (2002). Defining the zone of proximal development in US foreign language education. Applied Linguistics, 23, 240-261.

Kowal, M., & Swain, M. (1994). Using collaborative language production tasks to promote students’ linguistic awareness. Language Awareness, 3, 73-93.

Lee, L. (2002). Synchronous online exchanges: A study of modification devices on non-native discourse. System, 30, 275-288.

Lee, L. (2006). A study of native and non-native speakers’ feedback and responses in Spanish-American networked collaborative interaction. In J. Belz & S. L. Thorne (Eds.), Internet-mediated intercultural foreign language education. (pp. 147-176). Boston: Thomson Heinle.

Long, M., Inagaki, S., & Ortega, L. (1998). The role of implicit negative feedback in SLA: Models and recasts in Japanese and Spanish. Modern Language Journal, 82, 357-371.

Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 399-432.

Mackey, A., Oliver, R,. & Leeman, J. (2003). Interactional input and the incorporation of feedback: An exploration of NS-NNS adult and child dyads. Language Learning, 53, 35-66.

Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case applications in education: Revised and expanded from case study research in education (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Morris, F. (2005). Child-to-child interaction and corrective feedback in a computer mediated L2 class. Language Learning & Technology, 9(1), 29-45. Retrieved August 25, 2007, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol9num1/morris/default.html

Nassaji, H., & Swain, M. (2000). A Vygotskian perspective on corrective feedback in L2: The effect of random versus negotiated help on the learning of English articles. Language Awareness, 9, 34-51.

Ohta, A. (2000). Rethinking interaction in SLA: Developmentally appropriate assistance in the zone of proximal development and the acquisition of L2 grammar. In J. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language acquisition (pp. 51-78). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Oliver, R. (2000). Age differences in negotiation and feedback in classroom and pairwork. Language Learning, 50, 119-151.

Oscoz, A. (2003). Jigsaw and free discussion in synchronous computer-mediated communication. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa, Iowa City.

Palincsar, A. (1998). Keeping the metaphor of scaffolding fresh—A response to C. Addisons Stone’s “The metaphor of scaffolding: Its utility for the field of learning disabilities.” Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 370-373.

Pellettieri, J. (1999). Why-talk? Investigating the role of task-based interaction through synchronous network-based communication among classroom learners of Spanish. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Davis.

Pellettieri, J. (2000). Negotiation in cyberspace: The role of chatting in the development of grammatical competence. In M. Warschauer & R. Kern (Eds.), Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice (pp. 59-86). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sanders, R. (2006). A comparison of chat room productivity: In-class versus out-of-class. CALICO Journal, 24, 59-76. Retrieved June 21, 2009, from https://calico.org/page.php?id=5

Smith, B. (2001). Taking students to task: Task-based computer-mediated communication and negotiated interaction in the ESL classroom. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Arizona,

Tucson.

Smith, B. (2003). Computer-mediated negotiated interaction: An expanded model. Modern Language Journal, 87, 38-57.

Sotillo, S. (2005). Corrective feedback via instant messenger learning activities in NS-NNS dyads. CALICO Journal, 22, 467-496. Retrieved June 21, 2009, from https://calico.org/page.php?id=5

Storch, N. (2002). Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work. Language Learning, 52, 119-158.

Swain, M. (2000). The output hypothesis and beyond. In J. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language acquisition (pp. 97-114). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Swain, M. (2001). Examining dialogue: Another approach to content specification and to validating inferences drawn from test scores. Language Testing, 18, 275-302.

Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1995). Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: A step towards second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 16, 371-391.

Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1998). Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. Modern Language Journal, 82, 320-37.

Tudini, V. (2003). Using native speakers in chat. Language Learning & Technology, 7(3), 141-159. Retrieved April 25, 2008, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol7num3/tudini

Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Vygotsky, L. (1981). The genesis of higher mental functions. In J. V. Werstch (Ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology (pp. 143-184). Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.

Vygostky, L. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Wells, G. (1998). Using L1 to master L2: A response to Antón and DiCamilla’s “Socio-cognitive functions of L1 collaborative interaction in the L2 classroom.” The Canadian Modern Language Review, 54, 343-353.

Wertsch, J., & Stone, C. (1985). The concept of internalization in Vygostky’s account of the genesis of higher mental education. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), Culture, communication and cognition: Vygotskyian perspectives (pp. 162-179). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Downloads

Published

2013-01-14

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Oskoz, A. (2013). Learners’ Feedback in Online Chats: What Does It Reveal about Students’ Learning?. CALICO Journal, 27(1), 48-68. https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.27.1.48-68