Strategic Use of Modality during Synchronous CMC
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.27.1.101-117Keywords:
Synchronous Computer-Mediated Communication (SCMC), Positioning, Interaction, Discourse Analysis, Text ChatAbstract
Research on computer-mediated communication (CMC) in the second language (L2) classroom has revealed the potential for technology to promote learner interaction and opportunities for negotiation of meaning as well as to provide opportunities for language access outside the classroom environment. Despite this potential, social, linguistic, and technical factors can still limit the richness of interactional opportunities for L2 learners engaged in synchronous CMC. However, the multimodality of synchronous CMC may provide learners with tools and strategies (e.g., change of modality of communication by making selective use of text chat) that can help them garner increased opportunities for target language production. Such strategies were utilized during a 20-minute bimodal CMC exchange between a pair of L2 learners. During the course of the interaction, one learner employed voice chat almost exclusively, thereby positioning himself initially as the leader and more productive member of the conversation. However, at a midpoint in the interaction, the other learner began using the text chat option to gain a foothold in the conversation when her spoken turns were interrupted, ignored, or missed by her partner. By strategically appropriating the text-chat tool, she was able to negotiate the initial interactional asymmetries and reposition herself as a contributing, even guiding, member of the conversation.
References
Abrams, Z. (2001) Computer-mediated communication and group journals: Expanding the repertoire of participant roles. System, 29, 489-503.
Blake, R. (2000). Computer mediated communication: A window on L2 Spanish interlanguage. Language Learning & Technology, 4(1), 120-136. Retrieved June 10, 2002, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol4num1/blake/default.html
Belz, J.A. (2002). Social dimensions of telecollaborative foreign language study. Language Learning & Technology, 6(1), 60-81. Retrieved April 20, 2003, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol6num1/BELZ/default.html
Chun, D. (1994). Using computer networking to facilitate the acquisition of interactive competences. System, 22, 17-31.
Compton, L. (2002). From chatting to confidence: A case study of the impact of online chatting on international teaching assistants’ willingness to communicate, confidence level and fluency in oral communication. Unpublished master’s thesis, Iowa State University, Ames.
Davies, B., & Harré, R. (1990). Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 20, 43-63.
Donaldson, R., & Kötter, M. (1999). Language learning in cyberspace: Teleporting the classroom into the target culture. CALICO Journal, 16, 531-557. Retrieved June 29, 2009, from https://calico.org/page.php?id=5
Herring, S. (1996). Introduction. In S. Herring (Ed.), Computer-mediated communication: Linguistic, social, and cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 1-10). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Jacobsen, M. M. (2002). Transformations of literacy in computer-mediated communication: Orality, literacy, cyberdiscursivity. Lampeter, Wales: The Edwin Mellen Press.
Kern, R. (1995). Restructuring classroom interaction with networked computers: Effects on quantity and characteristics of language production. The Modern Language Journal, 79, 457-476.
Lee, L. (1998). Going beyond classroom learning: Acquiring cultural knowledge via on-line newspapers and intercultural exchanges via on-line chatrooms. CALICO Journal, 16, 101-120. Retrieved June 29, 2009, from https://calico.org/page.php?id=5
Lee, L. (2004). Learners’ perspectives on networked collaborative interaction with native speakers of Spanish in the US. Language Learning & Technology, 8(1), 83-100. Retrieved March 10, 2004, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol8num1/lee/default.html
Long, M., & Robinson, P. (1998). Focus on form: Theory, research, and practice. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 15-41). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Negretti, R. (1999). Web-based activities and SLA: A conversation analysis research approach. Language Learning & Technology, 3(1), 75-87. Retrieved January 1, 2008, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol3num1/negretti/
Oliveira, S. M. (2007). Breaking conversational norms on a Portuguese users’ network: Men as adjudicators of politeness? In B. Danet & S. Herring (Eds.). The multilingual Internet: Language, culture, and communication online (pp. 256-277). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Panyametheekul, S., & Herring, S. (2007). Gender and turn allocation in a Thai chat room. In B. Danet & S. Herring (Eds.). The multilingual Internet: Language, culture, and communication online (pp. 233-255). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pellettieri, J. (2000). Negotiation in cyberspace: The role of chatting in the development of grammatical competence. In M. Warschauer & R. Kern (Eds.), Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice (pp. 59-86). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pica, T., Kang, H., & Sauro, S. (2006). Information gap tasks: Their multiple roles and contributions to interaction research methodology. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 301-338.
Sauro, S. (2001). The success of task type in facilitating oral language production in online computermediated collaborative projects. Unpublished master’s thesis, Iowa State University, Ames.
Schiffrin, D. (1994). Approaches to discourse. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers Inc.
Selfe, C., & Meyer, P. (1991). Testing claims for online conferences. Written Communication, 8, 163-192.
Shin, D. S. (2006). ESL student’s computer-mediated communication practices: Context configuration. Language Learning & Technology, 10(3), 65-84. Retrieved September 4, 2007, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol10num3/shin/default.html
Sotillo, S. (2000). Discourse functions and syntactic complexity in synchronous and asynchronous communication. Language Learning & Technology, 4(1), 82-119. Retrieved June 10, 2002, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol4num1/sotillo/default.html
Sullivan, N., & Pratt, E. (1996). A comparative study of two ESL writing environments: A computerassisted classroom and a traditional oral classroom. System, 29, 491-501.
Taylor, S. (2001). Locating and conducting discourse analytic research. In M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, & S. J. Yates (Eds.), Discourse as data: A guide for analysis (pp. 5-48). London: Sage Publications.
Tudini, V. (2003). Using native speakers in chat. Language Learning & Technology, 7(3), 141-159. Retrieved November 15, 2004, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol7num3/tudini/default.html
Warschauer, M. (1996). Comparing face-to-face and electronic discussion in the second language classroom. CALICO Journal, 13, 7-25. Retrieved June 29, 2009, from https://calico.org/page.php?id=5
Wetherell, M., Taylor, S., & Yates, S. J. (2001). Introduction. In M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, & S. J. Yates (Eds.), Discourse as data: A guide for analysis (pp. i-iii). London: Sage Publications.
Yates, S. J. (2001). Gender, language and CMC for education. Learning and Instruction, 11, 21-34.
