A Comparison of Chat Room Productivity
In-class Versus Out-of-class
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v24i1.59-75Keywords:
Chat, Computer-mediated Communication, Synchronous CMC, Distributed EducationAbstract
Language production of Spanish students using synchronous CMC (chat) during class time was compared with that of students meeting outside of class. The study included about 100 participants enrolled in 10 sections of a first-quarter Spanish course at a US university. Students in the control group spent 30 minutes of their weekly class time in computer labs completing a chat room assignment. Students in the experimental group planned their own schedules for meeting 30 minutes each week, outside of class time, in chat rooms. Transcripts of the chat sessions were analyzed for duration, turns, words, vocabulary, socially appropriate comments, and comments off task. Production was greater when students met with their own work groups outside of class. The implication of the study is that greater student collaboration and responsibility result in greater production while conserving class time and technology resources.
References
Atkin, M. C. (1970). Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of instructional programs. In M. C. Wittrock & D. E. Wiley (Eds.), The evaluation of instruction: Issues and problems (pp. 221-238). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Bayer, A. (1990). Collaborative-apprenticeship learning: Language and thinking across the curriculum, K-12. Mountainview, CA: Mayfield.
Biesenbach-Lucas, S., & Weasenforth, D. (2001). E-mail and word processing in the ESL classroom: How the medium affects the message. Language Learning & Technology, 5 (1), 135-165. Retrieved April 18, 2006, from http://llt.msu.edu/ vol5num1/weasenforth/default.html
Blake, R. (2000). Computer mediated communication: A window on L2 Spanish interlanguage. Language Learning & Technology, 4 (1), 120-136. Retrieved April 18, 2006, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol4num1/blake
Beauvois, M. H. (1992). Computer-assisted classroom discussion in the foreign language classroom: Conversation in slow motion. Foreign Language Annals, 25 (5), 455464.
Beauvois, M. H. (1997). Computer-mediated communication: Technology for improving speaking and writing. In M. D. Bush (Ed.), Technology-enhanced language learning (pp. 165-184). Lincolnwood, IL: National Textbook Company.
Beauvois, M. H. (1998). Write to speak: The effects of electronic communication on the oral achievement of fourth semester French students. In J. A. Muykens (Ed.), New ways of learning and teaching: Focus on technology and foreign language education (pp. 165-183). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
Chun, D. (1994). Using computer networking to facilitate the acquisition of interactive competence. System, 22 (1), 17-31.
Darhower, M. (2002). Instructional features of synchronous computer-mediated communication in the intermediate L2 class: A sociocultural case study. CALICO Journal, 19 (2), 249-278.
Egbert, J., Paulus, T. M., & Nakamichi, M. (2002). The impact of CALL instruction on classroom computer use: A foundation for rethinking technology in teacher education. Language Learning & Technology, 6 (3), 108-126. Retrieved April 18, 2006, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol6num3/egbert
Feenberg, A. (1999, Winter). Distance learning: Promise or threat? National CrossTalk, 7 (1). Retrieved April 18, 2006, from http://www.highereducation.org/crosstalk/ct0199/opinion0199feenberg.shtml
Fletcher, J. D. (1995). [Computer-assisted military training]. In A. Melmed (Ed.), The costs and effectiveness of educational technology: Proceedings of a workshop (RAND, November 1995). Retrieved July 11, 2002, from http://www.ed.gov/ Technology/Plan/RAND/Costs/cover/html
Garrett, N. (1989). The synergism of technology and theory in classroom second language acquisition research. In J. E. Alatis (Ed.), Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics (pp. 288-294). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Garrett, N. (1991). Technology in the service of language learners: Trends and issues. Modern Language Journal, 75 (1), 74-101.
González-Bueno, M., & Pérez, L. C. (2000). Electronic mail in foreign language writing: A study of grammatical and lexical accuracy, and quantity of language. Foreign Language Annals, 33 (2), 189-198.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1993). Towards a language-based theory of learning. Linguistics and Education, 5 (1), 93-116.
Hawley, D. E., Fletcher, J. D., & Piele, P. K. (1986). Costs, effects, and utility of microcomputer-assisted instruction (Tech. Rep. No. 1). Eugene, OR: Center for Advanced Technology in Education.
Ittzes Abrams, Z. (2003). The effect of synchronous and asynchronous CMC on oral performance in German. Modern Language Journal, 87 (2), 157-167.
Kelm, O. R. (1992). The use of synchronous computer networks in second language instruction: A preliminary report. Foreign Language Annals, 25 (5), 441-454.
Kern, R. G. (1995). Restructuring classroom interaction with networked computers: Effects on quantity and characteristics of language production. Modern Language Journal, 79 (4), 457-476.
Kiesler, S., Siegel, J. & McGuire, T. W. (1984). Social psychological aspects of computermediated communication. American Psychologist, 39 (10), 1123-1134.
Knight, Susan. (2000). Expanding enrollment while maintaining quality: A Spanish 101 experimental model. Hispania, 83 (4), 855-863.
Kötter, M. (2003). Negotiation of meaning and code switching in online tandems. Language Learning & Technology, 7 (2), 145-172. Retrieved April 18, 2006, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol7num2/kotter
Lee, L. (2002). Enhancing learners’ communication skills through synchronous electronic interaction and task-based instruction. Foreign Language Annals, 35 (1), 16-24.
Levin, H. M. (1984). Costs and cost-effectiveness of computer assisted instruction (Project Rep. No. 84-A21). Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University, School of Education.
Maxwell, D., & Garrett, N. (2002). The challenge to language learning in higher education. Change, 34 (3), 22-28.
Mehan, H. (1985). The structure of classroom discourse. In T. A. Van Dijk (Ed.), Handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 119-131). London: Academia.
Meredith, R. (1983). Materials and equipment: The next generation. Modern Language Journal, 67 (4), 424-430.
Meskill, C. (1999). Computers as tools for sociocollaborative language learning. In K. Cameron (Ed.), Computer-assisted language learning (CALL): Media, design and applications (pp. 144-152). Exton, PA: Swets and Zeitlinger.
Payne, J. S., & Whitney, P. J. (2002). Developing L2 oral proficiency through synchronous CMC: Output, working memory, and interlanguage development. CALICO Journal, 20 (1), 7-32.
Pérez, L. C. (2003). Foreign language productivity in synchronous versus asynchronous Computer-mediated communication. CALICO Journal, 21 (1), 89-104.
Pérez-Sotelo, L., & González-Bueno, M. (2003). Idea: Electronic writing in L2: Accuracy vs. other outcomes. Hispania, 86 (4),869-873.
Salaberry, M. R. (2001). The use of technology for second language learning and teaching: A retrospective. Modern Language Journal, 85 (1), 39-56.
Smith, B. (2000). Computer-mediated negotiated interaction: An expanded model. Modern Language Journal, 87 (1), 38-57. Sotillo, S. M. (2000). Discourse functions and syntactic complexity in synchronous and asynchronous communication. Language Learning & Technology, 4 (1), 82-119. Retrieved April 18, 2006, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol4num1/sotillo
Stepp-Greany, J. (2002). Student perceptions on language learning in a technological environment: Implications for the new millennium. Language Learning & Technology, 6 (1), 165-180. Retrieved April 18, 2006, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol6num1/ STEPPGREANY/default.html
Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235-253). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Warschauer, M. (1996). Comparing face to face and electronic discussion in the second language classroom. CALICO Journal, 13 (2 & 3), 7-26.
Warschauer, M. (1997). Computer-mediated collaborative learning: Theory and practice. Modern Language Journal, 81 (4), 470-481.
Weasenforth, D., Biesenbach-Lucas, S., & Meloni, C. (2002). Realizing constructivist objectives through collaborative technologies: Threaded discussions. Language Learning and Technology, 6 (3), 58-86. Retrieved April 18, 2006, from http://llt. msu.edu/vol6num3/weasenforth
Wei, L. (2000). Unequal election of morphemes in adult second language. Applied Linguistics, 21 (1), 106-140.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
