Toward an Understanding of Incidental Input Enhancement in Computerized L2 Environments

Authors

  • Carolyn Gascoigne University of Nebraska at Omaha

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v24i1.147-162

Keywords:

Input Enhancement, Intake, Keyboarding, Salience, Pedagogical Grammar

Abstract

Computers, computer programs, and other novel and vivid technological applications to language learning can unintentionally redirect attentional resources and therefore increase the salience of unplanned as well as targeted features. Incidental activities such as keyboarding (Henry, 1992), manipulation of a mouse (Meunier, 1996), and other technical moves have the potential to produce unintended consequences, either facilitative or debilitative, on the SLA process. Following a review of the role of attention to form, in general, and input enhancement, in particular, this study examines the complementary effect of keyboarding as a medium of incidental input enhancement on the SLA endeavor. Indeed, keyboarding in an L2 can be particularly difficult because the insertion of diacritical marks can require "practice in the use of an unfamiliar keyboard layout, and may often involve the use of special key combinations" (Henry, 1992, p. 55). Here, the effect on recall of the additional steps and key combinations needed to insert an accent in a computerized environment is compared to that of pen-and-paper application of diacritics.

Author Biography

  • Carolyn Gascoigne, University of Nebraska at Omaha

    Carolyn Gascoigne is an associate professor of French and Second Language Acquisition, and Chair of the Department of Foreign Languages at the University of Nebraska at Omaha. Her research interests include second language composition, secondary to postsecondary articulation, and native-nonnative interaction styles. Her work has appeared in journals such as The French Review, Hispania, and Foreign Language Annals.

References

Adair-Hauck, B., & Cumo-Johanssen, P. (1997). Communication goal: Meaning making through a whole language approach. In J. K. Phillips (Ed.), Collaborations: Meeting new goals, new realities, Northeast Conference Reports (pp. 35-96). Lincolnwood, IL: NTC.

Alanen, R. (1995). Input enhancement and rule presentation in second language acquisition. In R. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language acquisition (pp. 259-302). Honolulu: University of Hawaii.

Asher, J. (1982). Learning another language through actions: The complete teachers guidebook. Los Gatos, CA: Sky Oaks Productions.

Baddeley, A. D. (1976). The psychology of human memory. New York: Basic Books.

Candelier, M. (1986). La Reflection sur la langue d’où vient-elle et qu’en ferons-nous? Les Langues Modèrnes, 80, 59-74.

Collentine, J. (1998a). Cognitive principles and CALL grammar instruction: A mind-centered input approach. CALICO Journal, 15 (1), 1-17.

Collentine, J. (1998b). Processing instruction and the subjunctive. Hispania, 80 (3), 576587.

DeGraaff, R. (1997). The Experanto experiment: Effects of explicit instruction on second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19 (2), 249-276.

Doughty, C. (1998). Acquiring competence in a second language: Form and function. In H. Byrnes (Ed.), Learning foreign and second languages (pp. 128-156). New York: MLA.

Doughty, C., &Williams, J. (1998a). Issues and terminology. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 1-12). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Doughty, C., &Williams, J. (1998b). Pedagogical choices in focus on form. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 197-261). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ellis, R. (1994). A theory of instructed second language acquisition. In N. Ellis (Ed.), Implicit and explicit language learning (pp. 79-114). London: Academic.

Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Fok, A. (1981). Reliability of student self assessment. Hong Kong: University of Hong Kong Press.

Fotos, S. (1993). Consciousness-raising through focus on form: Grammar task performance versus formal instruction. Applied Linguistics, 14 (3), 385-407.

Fotos, S. (1995). Integrating grammar instruction and communicative language use through grammar consciousness-raising tasks. TESOL Quarterly, 28 (2), 323-351.

Garrett, N. (1986). The problem with grammar: What kind can the language learner use? The Modern Language Journal, 70 (2), 133-148.

Gascoigne, C. (2000).The effect of keyboarding on the acquisition of diacritical marks in the foreign language classroom. The French Review, 73 (5), 899-907.

Gascoigne, C. (2002). Discrepancies in students and teacher perceptions of French language performance. French Review, 75 (5), 926-941.

Gascoigne, C. (2002). The debate on grammar in second language acquisition: Past, present, and future. Lewiston, NJ: Edwin Mellen Press.

Gnutzmann, C. (1997). Activités métalinguistiques et acquisition d’une langue. AILE, 8, 41-55.

Harley, B. (1993). Instructional strategies and SLA in early French immersion. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15 (2), 245-259.

Harley, B. (1998). The role of focus-on-form tasks in promoting child L2 acquisition. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 156-174). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Harley, B., & Swain, M. (1985). The interlanguage of immersion students and its implications for second language teaching. In A. Davies, C. Criper, & A.P. R. Howatt (Eds.), Interlanguage (pp. 291-311). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Heilenman, L. K. (1995). Grammar. In V. Galloway & C. Herron (Eds.), Research within reach II (pp. 129-148). Valdosta: Colson Printing Company.

Henry, G. (1992). Eliminating the keyboard: A new method for exotic L2 answer entry, feedback, and revisions. CALICO Journal, 10 (1), 53-68.

Herman, R. L., & Olson Flanigan, B. (1995). Adding grammar in a communicatively based ESL program for children: Theory and practice. TESL Canada Journal, 13 (1), 1-17.

Herron, C., & Tomasello, M. (1992). Acquiring grammatical structures by guided instruction. The French Review, 65 (5), 708-718.

Humphrey, J. H. (1967). The mathematics motor activity story. Arithmetic Teacher, 14 (1), 14-16.

Jerisld, A. (1962). Primacy, recency, frequency, and vividness. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64 (1), 123-125.

Labrie, G. (2000). A French vocabulary tutor for the web. CALICO Journal, 17 (3), 475499.

Leow, R. (1998). The effects of amount and type of exposure on adult learners’ L2 development in SLA. The Modern Language Journal, 82 (1), 49-68.

Lightbown, P., & Spada, N. (1990). Focus on form and corrective feedback in communicative language teaching: Effects on second language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12 (4), 429-446.

Lightbown, P., & Spada, N. (1994). An innovative program for primary ESL in Quebec. TESOL Quarterly, 28 (3), 563-579.

Long, M. (1991). The design and psycholinguistic motivation of research on foreign language learning. In B. Freed (Ed.), Foreign language acquisition research and the classroom (pp. 309-320). Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.

Long, M., Inagaki, S., & Ortega, L. (1998). The role of implicit negative feedback in SLA: Models and recasts in Japanese and Spanish. The Modern Language Journal, 82 (3), 357-371.

Long, M., & Robinson, P. (1998). Focus on form: Theory, research, and practice. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 15-41). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Luc, C. (1995). Quelle pertinence à la notion de language awareness pour un enseignement d’initiation à une autre langue étrangère en France, quels contenus? Notions en questions: Rencontres en Didactique des Langues, 1, 51-83.

Meunier, L. (1996). Human factors in a computer assisted foreign language environment: The effects of gender, personality, and keyboard control. CALICO Journal, 13 (1), 47-71.

Nagata, N., & Swisher, M. V. (1995). A study of consciousness-raising by computer: The effect of metalinguistic feedback on second language learning. Foreign Language Annals, 28 (3), 337-347.

Norris, J., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50 (3), 417-528.

Raasch, A. (1980). L’Auto-évaluation dans l’enseignement des adultes. Recherches et Echanges, 5 (1), 85-99.

Robinson, P. (1996). Consciousness, rules, and instructed second language acquisition. New York: Peter Lang.

Robinson, P. (1997). Generalizability and automaticity of second language learning under implicit, incidental, enhanced, and instructed conditions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19 (2), 223-247.

Rosa, E., & O’Neill, M. (1999). Explicitness, intake and the issue of awareness: Another piece to the puzzle. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21 (4), 511-556.

Rutherford, W. (1988a). Grammatical consciousness-raising in brief historical perspective. In W. Rutherford & M. Sharwood-Smith (Eds.), Grammar and second language teaching: A book of readings (pp. 15-18). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.

Rutherford, W. (1988b). Aspects of pedagogical grammar. In W. Rutherford & M. Sharwood-Smith (Eds.), Grammar and second language teaching: A book of readings (pp. 171-185). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.

Rutherford, W. (1988c). Functions of grammar in a language-teaching syllabus. In W. Rutherford & M. Sharwood-Smith (Eds.), Grammar and second language teaching: A book of readings (pp. 231-249). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.

Rutherford, W., & Sharwood Smith, M. (1985). Consciousness-raising and universal grammar. Applied Linguistics, 6 (2), 274-282.

Rutherford, W., & Sharwood Smith, M. (1988a). Consciousness-raising and universal grammar. In W. Rutherford & M. Sharwood-Smith (Eds.), Grammar and second language teaching: A book of readings (pp. 107-117). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.

Rutherford, W., & Sharwood Smith, M. (1988b). What is pedagogical grammar? In W. Rutherford & M. Sharwood-Smith (Eds.), Grammar and second language teaching: A book of readings (pp. 119-122). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.

Schmidt, R. (1990). The Role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11 (1), 129-158.

Schmidt, R. (1994). Deconstructing consciousness in search of useful definitions for applied linguistics. AILA Review, 11, 11-26.

Schmidt, R. (1995). Attention and awareness in foreign language learning. Honolulu: University of Hawaii at Manoa.

Scott, V. M. (1990). Explicit and implicit grammar teaching strategies: New empirical data. French Review, 63 (5), 779-789.

Sharwood Smith, M. (1991). Speaking to many minds: On the relevance of different types of language information for the L2 learner. Second Language Research, 7 (1), 118-132.

Sharwood Smith, M. (1993). Input enhancement in instructed SLA: Theoretical bases. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15 (2), 165-179.

Sharwood Smith, M. (2000). [Review of the book Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition]. Applied Linguistics, 21 (2), 272-279.

Simard, D., & Wong, W. (2004). Language awareness and its multiple possibilities for the L2 classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 37 (1), 96-109.

Tomasello, M., & Herron, C. (1989). Feedback for language transfer errors. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11 (3), 384-395.

Tomlin, R., & Villa, V. (1994). Attention in cognitive science and second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16 (2), 183-203.

Trévise, A. (1993). Acquisition/apprentissage/enseignement d’une langue2: Modes d’ob- servation, modes d’intervention. Revue de l’ACLA, 38-50.

Tulving, E., & Thompson, D. M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review, 80 (4), 352-373.

VanPatten, B. (1990). Attending to form and content in the input. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12 (3), 287-301.

VanPatten, B. (1992). Second language acquisition and foreign language teaching: Part 2. ADFL Bulletin, 23, 23-37.

VanPatten, B., & Cadierno, T. (1993). Explicit instruction and input processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15 (2), 225-241.

VanPatten, B., & Sanz, C. (1995). From input to output: Processing instruction and communicative tasks. In F. Eckman, D. Highland, P. Lee, J. Mileham, & R. Rutkowski (Eds.), Second language acquisition theory and pedagogy (pp. 168-185). Weber. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

White, J. (1998). Getting the learners’ attention: A typographical input enhancement study. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 85-113). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Williams, J., & Evans, J. (1998). What kind of focus and on which forms? In C. Doughty, & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 139-155). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Downloads

Published

2013-01-14

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Gascoigne, C. (2013). Toward an Understanding of Incidental Input Enhancement in Computerized L2 Environments. CALICO Journal, 24(1), 147-162. https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v24i1.147-162

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >>