Collective Activity and Tutor Involvement in E-learning Environments for Language Teachers and Learners
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v23i3.601-622Keywords:
Computer-supported Collaborative Learning, Computer-mediated Communication, Distance Tutoring, Online Interactions, Group AutonomyAbstract
Researchers investigating network-based language teaching (NBLT) seldom relate to computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL), an important field in educational research which strongly stresses the value of group learning, adopting Vygotskian and Brunerian sociocultural views. As a result, the concept of collaboration is scarcely considered or discussed by NBLT researchers. However, choosing between collaborative- or noncollaborative-learning settings when designing a distance learning course has a strong influence on tutor involvement. This paper explores the issue, thus attempting to bridge the gap between NBLT and CSCL. It does so by qualitatively analyzing online interactions in several distance learning courses (collaborative and noncollaborative) and by examining these verbal exchanges in the light of collective activity, learners' social autonomy, and tutor role and involvement. The methodological approach is qualitative and consists in analyzing, a posteriori, online interactions between learners and tutors. After having defined the theoretical framework, the authors compare structures of online interaction in two preservice teacher courses, focusing on the role of the tutor and the issue of student autonomy. Finally, they examine more precisely some features of collaboration, analyzing tutor and student interactions in an online language course.
References
Abric, J.-C. (1996). Psychologie de la communication. Paris: Armand Colin.
Barbot, M.-J. (2000). Les Auto-apprentissages. Paris: Clé International.
Belz, J. A. (Ed.). (2003a). Telecollaboration [Special Issue]. Language Learning & Technology, 7 (2). Retrieved February 7, 2006, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol7num2/de fault.html
Belz, J. A. (2003b). Welcome to the special issue. Language Learning & Technology, 7 (2), 2-5. Retrieved February 7, 2006, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol7num2/speced.html
Bullen, M. (1997). A case study of participation and critical thinking in a university-level course delivered by computer conferencing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Chapelle, C. A. (2000). Is networked-based learning CALL? In M. Warschauer & R. Kern (Eds.), Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice (pp. 204-228). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Deschryver, N. (2003). Le rôle du tutorat. In B. Charlier & P. Peraya (Eds.), Technologie et innovation en pédagogie (pp. 149-162). Bruxelles: De Boeck université.
Develotte, C., & Mangenot, F. (2004). Tutorat et communauté dans un campus numérique non collaboratif. Distances et savoirs, 2 (2-3), 309-333.
Dillenbourg, P., Baker, M., Blaye, A., & O’Malley, C. (1996). The evolution of research on collaborative learning. In E. Spada & P. Reiman (Eds.), Learning in humans and machine: Towards an interdisciplinary learning science (pp. 189-211). Oxford: Elsevier. Retrieved August 20, 2005, from http://tecfa.unige.ch/tecfa/publicat/ dil-papers-2/Dil.7.1.10.pdf
Dillenbourg, P. (1999). Introduction: What do you mean by “collaborative learning”? In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches (pp. 1-19). Amsterdam: Pergamon, Elsevier Science. Retrieved August 20, 2005, from http://tecfa.unige.ch/tecfa/publicat/dil-papers-2/Dil.7.1.14.pdf
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
George, S. (2001). Apprentissage collectif à distance. SPLACH: un environnement informatique support d’une pédagogie de projet. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Université du Maine, Le Mans, France.
Henri, F., & Lundgren-Cayrol, K. (2001). Apprentissage collaboratif à distance. Quebec: Presses de l’université du Québec.
Herring, S. (2004). Computer-mediated discourse analysis: An approach to researching online behavior. In S. A. Barab, R. Kling, & J. H. Gray (Eds.), Designing for virtual communities in the service of learning (pp. 338-376). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. (2004). Cooperation and the use of technology. In D. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (2nd ed.) (pp. 785-811). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Kern, R., Ware, P., & Warschauer, M. (2004). Crossing frontiers: New directions in online pedagogy and research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 243-260.
Kern, R., & Warschauer, M. (2000). Introduction: Theory and practice of network-based language teaching. In M. Warschauer & R. Kern (Eds.), Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice (pp.1-19). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Koschmann, T. (Ed.). (1996). CSCL: Theory and practice of an emerging paradigm. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Lamy, M.-N., & Goodfellow, R. (1999). ‘Reflective conversation’ in the virtual language classroom. Language Learning & Technology, 2 (2), 43-61. Retrieved February 7, 2006, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol2num2/article2
Linard, M. (2003). Autoformation, éthique et technologies: enjeux et paradoxes de l’autonomie. In B. Albero (Ed.), Autoformation et enseignement supérieur (pp. 241263). Paris: Hermès/Lavoisier.
Mangenot, F. (1996). Informatique et autonomie dans l’apprentissage des langues. In B. Rüschoff & D. Wolff (Eds.), Technology-enhanced language learning in theory and practice, Proceedings of EUROCALL 94 (pp. 21-32). Karlsruhe: Pädagogische Hochschule Karlsruhe.
Mangenot, F. (2003). Tâches et coopération dans deux dispositifs universitaires de formation à distance. ALSIC (Apprentissage des langues et systèmes d’information et de communication), 6 (1), 109-125. Retrieved February 7, 2006, from http://al sic.org
Nissen, E. (2003). Apprendre une langue en ligne dans une perspective actionnelle. Effets de l’interaction sociale. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Université Louis Pasteur, Strasbourg, France.
Nissen, E. (2005). Autonomie du groupe restreint et performance. ALSIC (Apprentissage des langues et systèmes d’information et de communication), 8 (1), 19-34. Retrieved February 17, 2006, from http://alsic.org
Paulus, T. M. (2005). Collaborative and cooperative approaches to online group work: The impact of task type. Distance Education, 26 (1), 111-125.
Peraya, D., & Dumont, P. (2003). Interagir dans une classe virtuelle: analyse des interactions verbales médiatisées dans un environnement synchrone. Revue française de pédagogie, n°145, 51-61.
Pléty, P. (1998). Comment apprendre et se former en groupe. Paris: Retz.
Sinclair, J., & Coulthard, M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Roschelle, J., & Teasley, S. D. (1995) Construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. In C. O’Malley (Ed.), Computer supported collaborative learning (pp. 69-97). Berlin, New York: Springer Verlag. Retrieved on August 20, 2005, from http://ctl.sri.com/publications/downloads/JointProblemSpace.pdf
Warschauer, M., & Kern, R. (Eds.). (2000). Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
