The Role of Students' Attitudes and Motivation in Second Language Learning in Online Language Courses

Authors

  • Eiko Ushida University of California

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v23i1.49-78

Keywords:

Motivation, Attitudes, Online Course, Second Language, Teachers' Role

Abstract

This study investigated the role of students' motivation and attitudes in second language (L2) study within an online language course context (LOL). Students' attitudes and motivation were examined within a socioeducational framework (Gardner & MacIntyre, 1993) while learning contexts were examined based on Dörneyi's (1994) components of foreign language learning motivation. Students' learning behaviors and learning outcomes were used as predictor and criterion variables in a series of quantitative and qualitative analyses. The results showed that students tended to have relatively high anxiety about the LOL course at the beginning of the semester, perhaps due to their lack of familiarity with the specific LOL learning environment. However, students' motivation and attitudes toward L2 study were relatively positive and stable during the course. The findings provided some evidence that motivated students studied regularly and productively to take every opportunity to perfect their language skills. It was also found that each teacher idiosyncratically implemented the LOL course, thereby creating a unique class culture and affecting students' motivation and attitudes toward studying the L2 in the LOL context. The findings reinforced the importance of students' motivation and attitudes in L2 study and, equally important, the continuing critical role of the teacher in technology-enhanced teaching.

Author Biography

  • Eiko Ushida, University of California

    Eiko Ushida (Ph.D. in Second Language Acquisition, Carnegie Mellon University, 2003) teaches Japanese at University of California, San Diego. Her research interests include application of technology in teaching and learning languages, Japanese language pedagogy, and materials development.

References

Adair-Hauck, B., Willingham-McLain, L., & Youngs, B. E. (1999). Evaluating the integration of technology and second language learning. CALICO Journal, 17 (2), 269-306.

Bartley, D. E. (1970). The importance of the attitude factor in language dropout: A preliminary investigation of group and sex differences. Foreign Language Annals, 3 (3), 383-393.

Beauvois, M. H. (1994). E-talk: Attitudes and motivation in computer-assisted classroom discussion. Computer and the Humanities, 28, 177-190.

Beauvois, M. H., & Eledge, J. (1996). Personality types and megabytes: Student attitudes toward computer mediated communication (CMC) in the language classroom. CALICO Journal, 13 (2/3), 27-46.

Belz, J. A. (2003). Linguistic perspectives on the development of intercultural competence in telecollaboration. Language Learning & Technology, 7 (2), 68-99. Retrieved May 2, 2005, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol7num2/belz/default.html

Brandl, K. (2002, March). Studentsʼ attitudes and perceptions of learning: A comparative study of a classroom-based and web-based language course. Taking language instruction online: Progress or demise? Paper presented at CALICO 2002, Davis, CA.

Bush, M. (1997). Implementing technology for language learning. In M. Bush (Ed.), Technology-enhanced language learning. (pp. 287-349). Lincolnwood, IL: National Textbook Company.

Chenoweth, N. A., Jones, C., Murday, K. & Ushida, E. (2003, May). Language online: Research conclusions and lessons learned. Paper presented at CALICO 2003, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

Chenoweth, N. A., & Murday, K. (2003). Measuring student learning in an online French course. CALICO Journal, 20 (2), 285-314.

Chun, D. M. (1994). Using computer networking to facilitate the acquisition of interactive competence. System, 22 (1), 17-31.

Clément, R., Gardner, R. C., & Smythe, P. C. (1977). Motivational variables in second language acquisition: A study of francophones learning English. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 9, 123-133.

Clément, R., Gardner, R. C., & Smythe, P. C. (1980). Social and individual factors in second language acquisition. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 12, 293302.

Clément, R., Major, L. J., Gardner, R. C. & Smythe, P. C. (1977). Attitudes and motivation in second language acquisition: An investigation of Ontario francophones. Working papers on Bilingualism, 12, 1-20.

Clément, R., Smythe, P. C. & Gardner, R. C. (1978). Persistence in second language study: Motivational considerations. Canadian Modern Language Review, 34, 688-694.

Crookes, G., & Schmidt, R. (1991). Motivation: Reopening the research agenda. Language Learning, 41 (4), 469-512.

Desmarais, L. (2002, March). Monitoring distance training. Paper presented at CALICO 2002, Davis, CA.

Doherty, K. M. (2002). Students speak out. Education Week, 11 (35), 19-23.

Dörnyei, Z. (1994). Motivation and motivating in the language foreign language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 78 (3), 273-284.

Dörnyei, Z. (2001a). Teaching and researching motivation. Harlow, England: Pearson Education.

Dörnyei, Z. (2001b). New themes and approaches in second language motivation research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 21, 43-59.

Gardner, R. C. (1985). Social psychology and second language learning: The role of attitudes and motivation. London: Edward Arnold.

Gardner, R. C. (2000). Correlation, causation, motivation and second language acquisition. Canadian Psychology, 41, 1-24.

Gardner, R. C., & Lambert, W. E. (1959). Motivational variables in second language acquisition. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 13 (4), 266-272.

Gardner, R. C., & MacIntyre, P. D. (1992). A studentʼs contribution to second language learning. Part I: Cognitive variables. Language Teaching, 25, 211-220.

Gardner, R. C., & MacIntyre, P. D. (1993). A studentʼs contribution to second language learning. Part II: Affective variables. Language Teaching, 26, 1-11.

Gardner, R. C., & Smythe, P. C. (1981). On the development of the attitude/motivation test battery. Canadian Modern Language Review, 37, 510-525.

Gardner, R. C., Tremblay, P. F., & Masgoret, A-M. (1997). Towards a full model of second language learning: An empirical investigation. The Modern Language Journal, 81 (3), 344-362.

Gilbert, S. D. (2001). How to be a successful online student. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Gliksman, L., Gardner, R. C., & Smythe, P. C. (1982). The role of the integrative motive on studentsʼ participation in the French classroom. Canadian Modern Language Review, 38, 625-647.

Glisan, E. W., Dudt, K. P., & Howe, M. S. (1998). Teaching Spanish through distance education: Implications of a pilot study. Foreign Language Annals, 31 (1), 48-66.

Gordon, M. E. (1980). Attitudes and motivation in second language achievement: A study of primary school students learning English in Belize, Central America. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Gressard, C. P., & Lloyd, B. H. (1986). Validation studies of a new computer attitude scale. Association for Educational Data Systems Journal, 18, 295-301.

Gruber-Miller, J., & Benton, C. (2001). How do you say “MOO” in Latin? Assessing student learning and motivation in beginning Latin. CALICO Journal, 18 (2), 305338.

Hertz, R. M. (1987). Computers in the language classroom. Menlo Park, CA: AddisonWesley.

Hiss, A. ( 2000). Talking the talk: Humor and other forms of online communication. In K. W. White & B. H. Weight (Eds.), The online teaching guide (pp. 24-36). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Hotho, S. (2000). “Same” or “different”? A comparative examination of classroom factors in second language settings. Foreign Language Annals, 33 (3), 320-329.

Jogan, M. K., Heredia, A. H., & Aguilera, G. M. (2001). Cross-cultural e-mail: Providing cultural input for the advanced foreign language student. Foreign Language Annals, 34 (4), 341-346.

Jones, C. (1986). Itʼs not so much the program, more what you do with it: The importance of methodology in CALL, System, 14 (2), 171-178.

Kern, R. G. (1995). Restructuring classroom interaction with networked computer: Effects on quantity and characteristics of language production. The Modern Language Journal, 79 (4), 457-476.

Kraemer, R. (1990). Social psychological factors related to the study of Arabic among Israeli Jewish high school students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Lafford, P. A., & Lafford, B. A. (1997). Learning language and culture with internet technologies. In M. Bush (Ed.), Technology-enhanced language learning (pp. 215262). Lincolnwood, IL: National Textbook Company.

Laine, E. (1977). Foreign language learning motivation in Finland 1. Turku: Turku University Press.

Lee, L. (1997). Using internet tools as an enhancement of C2 teaching and learning. Foreign Language Annals, 30 (3), 410-427.

Lee, L. (1998). Going beyond classroom learning: Acquiring cultural knowledge via online newspapers and intercultural exchanges via on-line chatrooms. CALICO Journal, 16 (2), 101-118.

Lett, J., & OʼMara, F. E. (1990). Predictors of success in an intensive language learning context: Correlates of language learning at the defense language institute foreign language center. In T. S. Parry & C. W. Stansfield (Eds.), Language aptitude reconsidered (pp. 222-260). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Regents.

Lewis, C. (2000). Taming the lions and tigers and bears: The WRITE WAY to communicate online. In K. W. White & B. H. Weight (Eds.), The online teaching guide (pp. 13-23). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Muchnick, A. G., & Wolfe, D. E. (1982). Attitudes and motivations of American students of Spanish. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 38, 262-281.

Murday, K, & Ushida, E. (2002, March). Student experiences in the language online project. Paper presented at CALICO 2002, Davis, CA.

Oldfather, P. (1995). Commentary: Whatʼs needed to maintain and extend motivation for literacy in the middle grades. Journal of Reading, 38 (6), 420-422.

Osuna, M. M., & Meskill, C. (1998). Using the world wide web to integrate Spanish language and culture: A pilot study. Language Learning & Technology, 1 (2), 71-92. Retrieved May 2, 2005, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol1num2/article4/default.html

Oxford, R. L., & Shearin, J. (1994). Language learning motivation: Expanding the theoretical framework. The Modern Language Journal, 78 (1), 12-28.

Padilla, A., & Sung, H. (1999). The Stanford foreign language oral skills evaluation matrix (FLOSEM): A rating scale for assessing communicative proficiency. Unpublished manuscript, Stanford University.

Ramage, K. (1990). Motivational factors and persistence in foreign language study. Language Learning, 40 (2), 189-219.

Sison, M. P. A. (1991). The relationship of college student attitudes, motivation, and anxiety to second language achievement: A test of Gardnerʼs model. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.

Taylor, C., Jamieson, J., Eignor, D., & Kirsch, I. (1998). The relationship between computer familiarity and performance on computer-based TOEFL test tasks. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Tremblay, P. F., & Gardner, R. C. (1995). Expanding the motivation construct in language learning. The Modern Language Journal, 79 (4), 505-520.

Trotter, A. (2002). E-learning goes to school. Education Week, 11 (35), 16-18.

Ushida, E. (2003). The role of studentsʼ attitudes and motivation in second language learning in online language courses. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh.

Ushida, E. (2002, December). How to be a successful online language student: Assessing language learning strategies from learnerʼs perspectives. Paper presented at 13th World Congress of Applied Linguistics, Singapore.

Ushida, E., & Igarashi, K. (2001, March). Learnerʼs perspective on on-line language courses: A case study. Paper presented at CALICO 2001, Orlando, FL.

Ushioda, E. (1996). Developing a dynamic concept of L2 motivation. In T. Hickey & J. Williams (Eds.), Language, education & society in a changing world (pp. 239245). Dublin: IRAAL/Multilingual Matters.

Ushioda, E. (1997). The role of motivational thinking in autonomous language learning. In D. Little & B. Voss (Eds.), Language centres: Planning for the new millennium. (pp. 38-50). Plymouth, UK: Cercles.

Van Aacken, S. (1999). What motivates L2 learners in acquisition of kanji using CALL: A case study, Computer Assisted Language Learning, 12 (2), 113-136.

Warschauer, M. (1996a). Comparing face-to-face and electronic discussion in the second language classroom. CALICO Journal, 13 (2/3), 7-26.

Warschauer, M. (1996b). Motivational aspects of using computers for writing and communication. In M. Warschauer (Ed.), Telecollaboration in foreign language learning: Proceedings of the Hawaiʼi symposium (Technical Report No. 12 pp. 29-46). Honolulu: University of Hawaiʼi Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.

White, K. (2000). Face to face in the online classroom: Keeping it interpersonal and human. In K. W. White & B. H. Weight (Eds.), The online teaching guide (pp. 112). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Winne, P. H., & Marx, R. W. (1989). A cognitive-processing analysis of motivation within classroom tasks. In C. Ames & R. Ames (Eds.), Research on motivation in education: Vol. 3. Goals and cognitions (pp. 223-257). San Diego: Academic Press, Inc.

Wudthayagorn, J. (2000). Attitude and motivation of elementary school students in a Japanese FLES program. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh.

Downloads

Published

2013-01-14

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Ushida, E. (2013). The Role of Students’ Attitudes and Motivation in Second Language Learning in Online Language Courses. CALICO Journal, 23(1), 49-78. https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v23i1.49-78