Challenge of Developing and Implementing Multimedia Courseware for a Japanese Language Program
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v22i2.237-250Keywords:
CALL, Japanese as Second Language, Curriculum Reform, Multimedia CoursewareAbstract
This paper discusses issues surrounding the development and implementation of Computer-Assisted Language Learning (CALL) at the curriculum- and program-levels. The Japanese program at the University of Alberta has introduced CALL courseware in language courses including those with multiple sections. An evaluation was conducted at the initial implementation stage to measure the success of the project. The results of the evaluation indicated that students and instructors were positive towards the curriculum reform through the implementation of CALL technologies. However, several issues also arose during the integration process. We found that the seamless integration of technologies was difficult to achieve, especially in dealing with a language like Japanese which requires additional software to display and input the idiographic characters. Our experience also underscores the importance of student support in the implementation stage. Special consideration should be taken to achieve a good "fit" between pedagogy and technology. Moreover, each instructor's understanding and sharing of his or her view of the CALL integrated instruction was found to be vital for a program-level CALL implementation. The University of Alberta case serves as an example and benchmark for others planning to conduct a similar project.
References
Arizumi, K., & Arizumi, L. (2002). Technical development of an online interactive Japanese program that provides stimuli for varied language learning preferences. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Computer Assisted Systems for Teaching & Learning Japanese, San Diego, CA, 41-44.
Barrette, C. M. (2001). Studentsʼ preparedness and training for CALL. CALICO Journal, 19 (1), 5-36.
Chapelle, C., & Jamieson, J. (1986). Computer assisted language learning as a predictor of success in acquiring English as a second language. TESOL Quarterly, 20, 27-46.
Bräuer, G. (2001). Pedagogy of language learning in higher education: An introduction. Westport, CN: Ablex.
Faseyitan, S., Libii, J. N., & Hirschbuhl, J. (1996). An inservice model for enhancing faculty computer self-effi cacy. British Journal of Educational Technology, 27 (3), 214-226.
Kabata, K., & Yang, X. J. (2002). Developing multimedia lesson modules for intermediate Japanese. CALICO Journal 19 (3), 563-570.
Lam, Y. (2000). Technophilia vs. technophobia: A preliminary look at why second language teachers do or do not use technology in their classrooms. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 56 (3), 389-420.
Nagata, N. (2002). An application of natural language processing to Web-based language learning. CALICO Journal, 19 (3), 583-599.
Waurschauer, M., & Healey, D. (1998). Computers and language learning: An overview. Language Teaching, 31, 57-71.
Zammit, S. (1992). Factors facilitating or hindering the use of computers in schools. Educational Research, 54, 57-66.