Electronic Tandem Language Learning (eTandem)
A Third Approach to Second Language Learning for the 21st Century
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v22i1.25-39Keywords:
CALL, Tandem, eTandem, CMC, VideoconferencingAbstract
Tandem language learning occurs when two learners of different native languages work together to help each other learn the other language. First used in face-to-face contexts, Tandem is now increasingly being used by language-learning partners located in different countries who are linked via various forms of electronic communication, a context that has become known as eTandem. In addition to providing a brief account of the history of Tandem and eTandem, this paper provides a comprehensive overview of electronic communication media suitable for eTandem, both asynchronous and synchronous, from the telephone and email to amateur radio and business-quality videoconferencing. Finally, the Electronic Network for Language And Culture Exchange (ENLACE) is introduced, a Web-based medium through which users of Windows, Macintosh, and Unix-based computers can find language learning partners and engage in eTandem language learning using synchronous text chat alone or in combination with video and/or audio conferencing.
References
Blake, R. (2000). Computer-mediated communication: A window on LS Spanish interlanguage. Language Learning & Technology, 4 (1), 120-136. Retrieved May 17, 2004, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol4num1/blake/default.html
Brammerts, H. (2001). Autonomes Sprachenlernen im Tandem: Entwicklung eines Konzepts. In H. Brammerts & K. Kleppin (Eds.), Selbstgesteuertes Sprachenlernen im Tandem: Ein Handbuch (pp. 9-16). Tübingen: Stauffenburg Verlag.
Brammerts, H., & Kleppin, K. (Eds.). (2001). Selbstgesteurtes Sprachenlernen im Tandem: Ein Handbuch. Tübingen, Germany: Stauffenberg Verlag.
Cziko, G. A., & Park, S. (2003). Internet audio communication for second language learning: A comparative review of six programs. Language Learning & Technology, 7 (1), 15-27. Retrieved May 17, 2004, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol7num1/review1/ default.html
d’Atri, D. (2002). Final Report: SBIR Phase I: eTandem distance coaching (DMI012870).
Doughty, C. J. (2003). Instructed SLA: Constraints, compensation, and enhancement. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 256-310). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Fernández-García, M., & Martínez-Arbelaiz, A. (2002). Negotiation of meaning in nonnative speaker-nonnative speaker synchronous discussions. CALICO Journal, 19 (2), 279-294.
Lee, L. (2004). Learners’ perspectives on networked collaborative interaction with native speakers of Spanish in the US. Language Learning & Technology, 8 (1), 83-100. Retrieved May 17, 2004, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol8num1/lee/default.html
Long, M. H. (1983). Does second language instruction make a difference? A review of research. TESOL Quarterly, 17 (3), 359-382.
Long, M. H. (1988). Instructed interlanguage development. In L. Beebe (Ed.), Issues in second language acquisition: Multiple perspectives (pp. 115-141). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Meisel, J., Clahsen, H., & Pienemann, M. (1981). On determining developmental stages in natural second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 3, 109-135.
Norris, J., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50, 417-528.
Schumann, J. (1978a). The acculturation model for second language acquisition. In R. Gingras (Ed.), Second language acquisition and foreign language teaching (pp. 27-50). Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.
Schumann, J. (1978b). The pidginization process: A model for second language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Schwienhorst, K. (1998). The “third place”—virtual reality applications for second language learning. ReCALL, 10 (1), 118-126.
Smith, B. (2003). Computer-mediated negotiated interaction: An expanded model. Modern Language Journal, 87 (1), 38-57.
Ushioda, E. (2000). Tandem language learning via email: From motivation to autonomy. ReCALL, 12 (2), 121-128.
Wooding, J. (1997). Email tandem learning and the communicative curriculum. ReCALL, 9 (1), 22-23.