Electronic Tandem Language Learning (eTandem)

A Third Approach to Second Language Learning for the 21st Century

Authors

  • Gary Cziko University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v22i1.25-39

Keywords:

CALL, Tandem, eTandem, CMC, Videoconferencing

Abstract

Tandem language learning occurs when two learners of different native languages work together to help each other learn the other language. First used in face-to-face contexts, Tandem is now increasingly being used by language-learning partners located in different countries who are linked via various forms of electronic communication, a context that has become known as eTandem. In addition to providing a brief account of the history of Tandem and eTandem, this paper provides a comprehensive overview of electronic communication media suitable for eTandem, both asynchronous and synchronous, from the telephone and email to amateur radio and business-quality videoconferencing. Finally, the Electronic Network for Language And Culture Exchange (ENLACE) is introduced, a Web-based medium through which users of Windows, Macintosh, and Unix-based computers can find language learning partners and engage in eTandem language learning using synchronous text chat alone or in combination with video and/or audio conferencing.

Author Biography

  • Gary Cziko, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

    Gary A. Cziko (garycziko.net) is Professor of Educational Psychology and of English as an International Language at the University of Illinois at UrbanaChampaign. His interests include the development and use of autonomous technology-assisted language learning (ATALL). He is the founder of the Electronic Network for Language And Culture Exchange (ENLACE).

References

Blake, R. (2000). Computer-mediated communication: A window on LS Spanish interlanguage. Language Learning & Technology, 4 (1), 120-136. Retrieved May 17, 2004, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol4num1/blake/default.html

Brammerts, H. (2001). Autonomes Sprachenlernen im Tandem: Entwicklung eines Konzepts. In H. Brammerts & K. Kleppin (Eds.), Selbstgesteuertes Sprachenlernen im Tandem: Ein Handbuch (pp. 9-16). Tübingen: Stauffenburg Verlag.

Brammerts, H., & Kleppin, K. (Eds.). (2001). Selbstgesteurtes Sprachenlernen im Tandem: Ein Handbuch. Tübingen, Germany: Stauffenberg Verlag.

Cziko, G. A., & Park, S. (2003). Internet audio communication for second language learning: A comparative review of six programs. Language Learning & Technology, 7 (1), 15-27. Retrieved May 17, 2004, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol7num1/review1/ default.html

d’Atri, D. (2002). Final Report: SBIR Phase I: eTandem distance coaching (DMI012870).

Doughty, C. J. (2003). Instructed SLA: Constraints, compensation, and enhancement. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 256-310). Malden, MA: Blackwell.

Fernández-García, M., & Martínez-Arbelaiz, A. (2002). Negotiation of meaning in nonnative speaker-nonnative speaker synchronous discussions. CALICO Journal, 19 (2), 279-294.

Lee, L. (2004). Learners’ perspectives on networked collaborative interaction with native speakers of Spanish in the US. Language Learning & Technology, 8 (1), 83-100. Retrieved May 17, 2004, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol8num1/lee/default.html

Long, M. H. (1983). Does second language instruction make a difference? A review of research. TESOL Quarterly, 17 (3), 359-382.

Long, M. H. (1988). Instructed interlanguage development. In L. Beebe (Ed.), Issues in second language acquisition: Multiple perspectives (pp. 115-141). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

Meisel, J., Clahsen, H., & Pienemann, M. (1981). On determining developmental stages in natural second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 3, 109-135.

Norris, J., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50, 417-528.

Schumann, J. (1978a). The acculturation model for second language acquisition. In R. Gingras (Ed.), Second language acquisition and foreign language teaching (pp. 27-50). Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.

Schumann, J. (1978b). The pidginization process: A model for second language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

Schwienhorst, K. (1998). The “third place”—virtual reality applications for second language learning. ReCALL, 10 (1), 118-126.

Smith, B. (2003). Computer-mediated negotiated interaction: An expanded model. Modern Language Journal, 87 (1), 38-57.

Ushioda, E. (2000). Tandem language learning via email: From motivation to autonomy. ReCALL, 12 (2), 121-128.

Wooding, J. (1997). Email tandem learning and the communicative curriculum. ReCALL, 9 (1), 22-23.

Downloads

Published

2013-01-14

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Cziko, G. (2013). Electronic Tandem Language Learning (eTandem): A Third Approach to Second Language Learning for the 21st Century. CALICO Journal, 22(1), 25-39. https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v22i1.25-39

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >>