Teaching Arabic with Technology at BYU
Learning from the Past to Bridge to the Future
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v21i3.497-522Keywords:
language learning, technology, standards, Unicode, ArabicAbstract
Reporting in 1971 on research related to computer-based methods for teaching the Arabic writing system, Bunderson and Abboud cited the potential that computers have for language learning, a largely unfulfilled potential even in 2004. After a review of the relevant historical background for the justification of computer-aided language learning (CALL) and pedagogical considerations for instructional materials development, this article describes recent advances in online technologies, justifying the conclusion that the field is poised to make great strides. Given the high costs for materials development, it is essential (a) to not abandon existing materials, (b) to use the most effective techniques possible for new materials, and (c) to conform to existing standards to ensure the widest possible materials delivery. The authors of this article discuss efforts at Brigham Young University to work within these standards in the re-engineering of materials to make them more useful, maintainable, and accessible, describing at the same time important principles for creating materials that are interoperable with existing online delivery platforms. In this project, hundreds of Arabic activities from Apple's HyperCard environment were converted to Unicode-compliant, template-driven, XML-based, Web-deliverable activities. In addition to discussing Unicode, SCORM, and MPEG-7, the authors provide background and justification for important development decisions.
References
Abboud, P. F., & McCarus, E. N. (Eds.). (1983). Elementary Modern Standard Arabic (Vols. 1-2). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Alhawary, M. T. (2001). Changing teacher roles and input-feedback medium: Authorware and Web-based assisted language learning of Arabic as a foreign language. In K. Cameron (Ed.), C.A.L.L.—The challenge of change: Research and practice (pp. 329-336). Exeter, UK: Elm Bank Publications.
Allen, J. R. (1972). Current trends in computer-assisted instruction. Computers and the Humanities, 7 (1), 47-56.
Allen, R. (1993). Proficiency and Arabic: The increasing role of technology. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 6 (1), 3-12.
Allen, R., & Allouche. (1986). Letʼs learn Arabic: A proficiency-based syllabus for Modern Standard Arabic. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Atkinson, R. C., Attala, E. E., Blitzer, D. L., Bunderson, C. V., Charp, S., & Hirschbuhli, J. J. (1978). Where will computer-assisted instruction (CAI) be in 1990? Educational Technology, 18 (4), 60-63.
Beheydt, L. (1987). The semantization of vocabulary in foreign language learning. System, 15 (1), 55-67.
Belnap, R. K. (1993). Computer-assisted language learning and Arabic: The Brigham Young University experience. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 6 (1), 1319.
Belnap, R. K. (2001). Arabic CALL: Lessons from the past, opportunities for the future. In K. Cameron (Ed.), C.A.L.L—The challenge of change: Research and practice (pp. 367-371). Exeter, UK: Elm Bank Publications.
Blyth, C. (1999). Implementing technology in the foreign language curriculum: Redefining the boundaries between language and culture. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 20 (1), 39-58.
Borrás, I., & Lafayette, R. (1994). Effects of multimedia courseware subtitling on the speaking performance of college students of French. The Modern Language Journal, 78 (1), 61-75.
Brustad, K., Al-Batal, M., & Al-Tonsi, A. (1997). Al-Kitab Fii Taʼallum Al-ʼArabiyya: A textbook for Arabic (Pt. 1 & Pt. 2). Georgetown: Georgetown University Press.
Bunderson, C. V., & Abboud, V. C. (1971). A computer-assisted instruction program in the Arabic writing system (Technical Report No. 4). Austin, TX: The University of Texas at Austin. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED052603)
Burston, J. (2003). Proving IT works. CALICO Journal, 20 (2), 219-226.
Bush, M. D. (1989a). Banquet Address—CALICO ʻ89 at the U.S. Air Force Academy. CALICO Journal, 7 (1), 5-15. Also retrieved October 1, 2003, from http://calico. org/journalarticles/Volume7/vol7-1/Bush.pdf
Bush, M. D. (1989b). Reasons the interactive videodisc industry should do windows. Multimedia Monitor. Retrieved November, 2003, from http://arclite.byu.edu/digital/ windows.html
Bush, M. D. (1991). Hardware for language training: Coping with confusion. Applied Language Learning, 2 (2), 77-91. (ERIC Journal Reproduction Service No. EJ445917)
Bush, M. D. (2002). Connecting instructional design to international standards for content reusability. Educational Technology, 42 (6), 5-13.
Chapelle, C. (1997). CALL in the year 2000: Still in search of research paradigms? Language Learning & Technology, 1 (1), 19-43. Retrieved October 1, 2003, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol1num1/chapelle/
Chapelle, C. (1998). Multimedia CALL: Lessons to be learned from research on instructed SLA. Language Learning & Technology, 2 (1), 22-34. Retrieved October 1, 2003, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol2num1/article1/
Chun, D. M., & Plass, J. L. (1996). Effects of multimedia annotations on vocabulary acquisition. The Modern Language Journal, 80 (2), 183-198.
Chun, D. M., & Plass, J. L. (1997). Research on text comprehension in multimedia environments. Language Learning & Technology, 1 (1), 60-81. Retrieved October 1, 2003, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol1num1/chun_plass/
Curtin, C., Clayton, D., Finch, C., Moor, D., & Woodruff, L. (1972). Teaching the translation of Russian by computer. The Modern Language Journal, 56 (6), 354-360.
Cushion, S., & Hémard, D. (2002). Applying new technological developments to CALL for Arabic. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 15 (5), 501-508.
Cushion, S., & Hémard, D. (2003). Designing a CALL package for Arabic while learning the language ab initio. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 16 (1), 259-266.
Day, N. (2001, November 12). MPEG-7 tackles multimedia content. EE Times. Retrieved October 24, 2003, http://www.eet.com/story/OEG20011112S0058
Dodds, P. (2001). The SCORM Overview. Advanced distributed learning network, sharable content object reference model (SCORM) Version 1.2. Retrieved November, 2003, from http://www.adlnet.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=DownFile&libid=40& bc=false
Doughty, C. J., & Long, M. H. (2003). Optimal psycholinguistic environments for distance foreign language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 7 (3), 50-80. Retrieved November, 2003, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol7num3/doughty/
Dorwick, T. (2002, March). The changing paradigm: Are we ready for it? Keynote Banquet Address presented at the annual meeting of CALICO, Davis, CA.
Ehsani, F., & Knodt, E. (1998). Speech technology in computer-aided language learning: Strengths and limitations of a new CALL paradigm. Language Learning & Technology, 2 (1), 45-60. Retrieved December 30, 2003, from http://llt.msu. edu/vol2num1/article3/
Garrett, N., & Hart, R. S. (1987). Foreign language teaching and the computer. Foreign Language Annals, 20 (5), 441-443.
Glennan, T. K., & Melmed, A. (1996). Fostering the use of educational technology: Elements of a national strategy (MR-682-OSTP). RAND. Retrieved October 1, 2003, from: http://www.rand.org/publications/MR/MR682/contents.html
Hayes, J. (2002). K-12 technology update for CoSN. Quality education data. Retrieved October, 2003, from http://www.k12schoolnetworking.org/2002/presentations/ hayes.ppt
Humanities Computing Laboratory. (2003). WinCALIS computer assisted language instruction system. Retrieved October, 2003, from http://www.humancomp.org/ wincalis.htm
Jorstad, H. L. (1980). New approaches to assessment of language learning. In T. H. Geno (Ed.), Northeast conference reports: Our profession: present status and future directions. Middlebury, VT: Northeast Conference on the Teaching of Foreign Languages, Inc.
Krashen, S. D. (1989). Language teaching technology: A low-tech view. In J. E. Alatis (Ed.), Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics 1989 (pp. 393-407). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C. L. C. (1987). Review of recent research literature on computerbased instruction. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 12, 222-230.
Lee, K. (2000). English teachersʼ barriers to the use of computer-assisted language learning. The Internet TESL Journal, 6 (12). Retrieved in October, 2003 from http:// iteslj.org/Articles/Lee-CALLbarriers.html
Manjunath, B., Salembier, P., & Sikora T. (2002). Introduction to MPEG-7: Multimedia content description interface. West Sussex, England: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Market Data Retrieval. (2003). Wireless network technology skyrockets on college campuses. Press release dated February 21, 2003, citing The college technology review, 2002-2003 academic year. Retrieved November, 2003, from http://www. schooldata.com/pdfs/colltechpr_03.pdf
McArthur, D., & Lewis, M. (1998). Untangling the Web: Applications of the Internet and other information technologies to higher education (MR-975-IET). RAND. Retrieved October 1, 2003, from: http://www.rand.org/publications/MR/MR975/
Merrill, M. D., Li, Z., & Jones, M. K. (1992). Instructional transaction shells: Responsibilities, methods, and parameters. Educational Technology, 32 (2), 5-27. Retrieved January 14, 2004, from: http://www.id2.usu.edu/Papers/TxParameter.PDF
Nielsen H. L., & Carlsen, M. (2003). Interactive Arabic grammar on the Internet: Problems and solutions. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 16 (1), 95-112.
Ruplin, F. A., & Russell, J. R. (1968). A type of computer-assisted instruction. The German Quarterly, 41 (1), 84-88.
Scebold, C. E. (1983). Equal time. CALICO Journal, 1 (1), 13-14. Retrieved October, 2003, from http://calico.org/journalarticles/Volume1/vol1-1/Scebold.pdf
Tansey, F. (2004, January). Hoping for a year of standards in 2004. Syllabus: Technology for Higher Education. Retrieved January 8, 2004, from http://www.syllabus. com/news_article.asp?id=8757&typeid=155
Unicode Consortium. (2003a). What is Unicode? Retrieved December, 2003, from http:// www.unicode.org/standard/WhatIsUnicode.html
Unicode Consortium. (2003b) History of Unicode. Retrieved December, 2003, from http:// www.unicode.org/history/
US Census Bureau. (2001, September). Home computers and Internet use in the United States: August 2000 (Special Studies). Retrieved November 14, 2003, from http://www.census.gov/prod/2001pubs/p23-207.pdf
Wong, W., & VanPatten, B. (2003). The evidence is IN drills are OUT. Foreign Language Annals, 36 (3), 403-423.
Zhao, Y. (2003). Recent developments in technology and language learning: A literature review and meta-analysis. CALICO Journal, 21 (1), 7-27.