Distance Language Learning
Interactivity and Fourth-generation Internet-based Videoconferencing
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v21i2.373-395Keywords:
Computer-mediated Communication (CMC), Fourth Generation Distance Language Education, Email, Audioconferencing, Videoconferencing, NetMeeting, Interaction, Oral-visual InteractionAbstract
This article provides a report on NetMeeting as an appropriate fourth-generation tool for interactive language learning in distance mode. It follows on earlier research by Wang and Sun (2000, 2001) on the most urgent problem facing distance language education--lack of provision of oral-visual interaction and the emergence of a fourth-generation distance language learning. The article proceeds through three cumulative parts. The first part is a definitional context of interaction and computer-mediated communication (CMC) as a framework for the article. The second part focuses on interaction as a core problem in the language learning literature and suggests a new taxonomy through CMC in terms of the potential for written, oral, and, more recently, oral-visual interaction. The third part, and the substance of the article, is an empirical investigation of Internet-based videoconferencing tools focusing on NetMeeting as the most appropriate one in terms of meeting criteria proposed for such tools.
References
Bates, A. W. (1997). The impact of technological changes on open and distance learning. Distance Education, 18 (1), 93-109.
Bruce, V. (1996). The role of face in communication: Implications for videophone design. Interacting with Computers, 8 (2), 166-176.
Buckett, J., & Stringer, G. (1997, September). ReLaTe (Remote Language Teaching): Progress, problems and potential. Paper presented at the annual meeting of EUROCALL, Dublin, Ireland.
Buckett, J., & Stringer, G. (1999). Internet videoconferencing’s 3Ms: Multiway, multimedia, multicast. Retrieved August 28, 2001, from http://www.ex.ac.uk/pallas/ relate/papers/peg99/stringer.htm
Buckett, J., Stringer, G., & Datta, J. (1999). Life after ReLaTe: Internet videoconferencing’s growing pains. In K. Cameron (Ed.), CALL and the Learning Community (pp. 31-38). Exeter, UK: Elm Bank Publications.
Burke, C., Lundin, R., & Daunt, C. (1997). Pushing the boundaries of interaction in videoconferencing: A dialogical approach. Distance Education, 18 (2), 349360.
Garrison, D. R. (1997). Computer conferencing: The post-industrial age of distance education. Open Learning, 12 (2), 3-11.
Hall, J. K. (1995). “Aw, man, Where you goin?”: Classroom interaction and the development of L2 interactional competence. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 6, 37-62.
Harrington, M., & Levy, M. (2001). CALL begins with a “C”: Interaction in computermediated language learning. System, 29, 15-26.
Hauck, M., & Haezewindt, B. (1999). Adding a new perspective to distance (language) learning and teaching—The tutor’s perspective. ReCALL, 11 (2), 46-54.
Herring, S. C. (Ed.). (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Linguistic, social and cross-cultural perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hewer, S., Kötter, M., Rodine, C. R., & Shield, L. (1999, September). The right tools for the job: Criteria for the choice of tools in the design of a virtual, interactive environment for distance language learners and their tutors. Paper presented at the annual meeting of EUROCALL, Besançon, France.
Ibañez, A., & Duque, M. (1999). Pedagogical issues. Retrieved December 20, 2000, from http://greco.dit.upm.es/~leverage/levenews/pedagog5.htm
Kitade, K. (2000). L2 learners’ discourse and SLA theories in CMC: Collaborative interaction in internet chat. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 13 (2), 143166.
Kötter, M., Shield, L., & Stevens, A. (1999). Real-time audio and email for fluency: Promoting distance language learners’ aural and oral skills via the Internet. ReCALL, 11 (2), 55-60.
Lamy, M., & Goodfellow, R. (1999). “Reflective conversation” in the virtual language classroom. Language Learning & Technology, 2 (2), 43-61. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/vol2num2/article2
Lantolf, J. P. (1994). Sociocultural theory and second language learning: Introduction to the special issue. Modern Language Journal, 78 (4), 418-420.
Levy, M. (1997). Theory-driven CALL and the development process. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 10, 41-56.
Levy, M. (2000). Scope, goals and methods in CALL research: Questions of coherence and autonomy. ReCALL, 12 (2), 170-195.
Marsh, D., Arnold, I., Ellis, N., Halliwell, J., Hodgins, C., & Malcolm, S. (1997). Project MERLIN: A learning environment of the future. ReCALL, 9 (1), 52-54.
Mason, R. (1994). Using communications media in open and flexible learning. London: Kogan Page.
McAndrew, P., Foubister, S. P., & Mayes, T. (1996). Videoconferencing in a language learning application. Interacting with Computers, 8 (2), 207-217.
Moore, M. G. (1989). Editorial: Three types of interaction. The American Journal of Distance Education, 13 (2), 1-6.
Negretti, R. (1999). Web-based activities and SLA: A conversation analysis research approach. Language Learning & Technology, 3 (1), 75-87. Retrieved from http: //llt.msu.edu/vol3num1/negretti
Ohta, A. S. (1995). Applying sociocultural theory to an analysis of learner discourse: Learner-learner collaborative interaction in the zone of proximal development. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 6, 93-121.
Paramskas, D. (1999). The shape of computer mediated communication. In K. Cameron (Ed.), CALL: Media, design and applications (pp. 13-34). Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
Pennington (1999). The missing link in computer-assisted writing. In K. Cameron (Ed.), CALL: Media, design & applications (pp. 271-294). Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
Rivers, W. M. (1987). Interaction as the key to teaching language for communication. In W. M. Rivers (Ed.), Interactive language learning (pp. 3-16). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Santoro, G. (1995). What is computer mediated communication? In Z. Berge & M. Collins (Eds.), Computer mediated communication and the online classroom in distance Learning (pp. 11-28). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
Shield, L., Hauck, M., & Hewer, S. (2001). Talking to strangers—the role of the tutor in developing target language speaking skills at a distance. In A. Kazeroni (Ed.), Proceedings of UNTELE 2000: Vol. II. Use of new technologies in foreign language teaching (pp. 75-84). La bibliothèque de l’Université de Technologie de Compiègne: Compiègne, France. Retrieved from http://www.utc.fr/~untele
Shield, L., & Hewer, S. (1999). A synchronous learning environment to support distance language learners. In K. Cameron (Ed.), Call and the learning community (pp. 379-390). Exeter, UK: Elm Bank Publications.
Summerfield, Q. (1992). Lipreading and audio-visual speech perception. Philosophical Trans. Royal Society of London, B335, 71-78.
Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1995). Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: A step towards second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 16, 371-391.
Thompson, D. J. (1996). Audioteleconferencing: Myths and realities. Open Learning, 11 (2), 20-27.
Wang, Y., & Sun, C. (2000). Synchronous distance education: Enhancing speaking skills via Internet-based real time technology. In X. Zhou, J. Fong, X. Jia, Y.
Kambayashi, & Y. Zhang (Eds.), Proceedings of the first international conference on web information systems engineering (pp. 168-172). Los Alamitos, CA: IEE Computer Society.
Wang, Y., & Sun, C. (2001). Internet-based real time language education: Towards a fourth generation distance education. CALICO Journal, 18 (3), 539-561.
Warschauer, M. (1997). Computer-mediated collaborative learning: Theory and practice. The Modern Language Journal, 81, 470-481.
Wells, G. (1981). Language as interaction. In G. Wells (Ed.), Learning through interaction: The study of language development (pp. 22-72). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wong, J., & Fauverge, A. (1999). LEVERAGE—Reciprocal peer tutoring over broadband networks. ReCALL, 11 (1), 33-142.
