Foreign Language Productivity in Synchronous Versus Asynchronous Computer-mediated Communication
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v21i1.89-104Keywords:
Computer-mediated Communication, Email, Chatroom, Language Productivity, VocabularyAbstract
This study investigates language productivity in a foreign language learner output obtained via two different modes of computer-mediated communication (CMC): asynchronous (email dialog journals) and synchronous (chatroom sessions). The research questions to be answered in the study were: (a) Which form of CMC, synchronous (chatroom activities) or asynchronous (email), would be more effective in increasing language productivity in foreign language learning? And (b) Which form of CMC would participants prefer? A within-subject design was used in the study with 24 participants who were studying first semester Spanish with one instructor. Participants emailed a dialog journal in Spanish to their instructor every Tuesday during the semester and they also attended the chatroom every Thursday to chat with their instructor and with each other in Spanish. Students met in the conventional classroom three times a week and via CMC on Tuesdays and Thursdays. The researcher tallied how many new vocabulary words participants produced in the email journals as opposed to new vocabulary words produced in chatroom sessions. (The researcher counted only those words that did not appear in the textbook or had been taught in class.) Results showed that there were no significant differences between the two CMC modes. However, a higher number of words were produced in the chatroom discussions than in the email messages. Fifty percent of the students preferred electronic mail and the other 50% were more inclined towards chatroom sessions. The author concluded that both techniques had benefits for vocabulary enrichment and productivity and that both tools enhanced the language acquisition process.
References
ACTFL, AATF, AATG, AATI, AATSP, ACL, ACTR, CLASES/CLTA, & NCJLT/ATJ. (1996). Foreign Language Standards. Lawrence, KS: Allen Press Inc.
Al-Seghayer, K. (2001). The effect of multimedia annotation modes on L2 vocabulary acquisition: a comparative study. Language Learning and Technology, 5 (1), 202-232. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/vol5num1/alseghayer/default.html
Beauvois, M. (1998). Write to speak: the effects of electronic communication on the oral achievement of fourth semester French students. In J. A. Muyskens (Ed.), New ways of learning and teaching: focus on technology and foreign language education. (pp. 165-183). Boston: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
Berge, Z., & Collins, M. (Eds.). (1995). Computer-mediated communication and the online classroom in distance learning. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
Buck, K., Byrnes, H., & Thompson, I. (Eds.). (1989). The ACTFL oral proficiency interview tester training manual. Yonkers, NY: ACTFL.
Bush, M. D. (1997). Implementing technology for language learning. In M. D. Bush & R. M. Terry (Eds.), Technology-enhanced language learning (pp. 287-349). Lincolnwood, IL: National Textbook Company.
Chapelle, C. (1998). Multimedia CALL: lessons to be learned from research on instructed SLA. Language Learning and Technology, 2 (1), 22-34. Retrieved from http:/ /polyglot.cal.msu.edu/llt/vol2num1/article1/index.html
Chun, D., & Plass, J. (1996). Effects of multimedia annotations on vocabulary acquisition. The Modern Language Journal, 80 (2), 183-198.
Dede, C. (1993). The future of multimedia: bridging to virtual worlds. In D. Gayeski (Ed.), Multimedia for learning: Development, application and evaluation (pp. 113-130). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
Duquette, L., & Painchaud, G. (1996). A comparison of vocabulary acquisition in audio and video contexts. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 54 (1) 143-172.
Ehsani, F., & Knodt, E. (1998). Speech technology in computer-aided language learning: Strengths and limitations of a new call paradigm. Language Learning and Technology, 2 (1), 45-60. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/vol2num1/article3/ index.html
Ferrara, K., Bruner, H., & Whittemore, G. (1991). Interactive written discourse as an emergent register. Written Communication, 8, 8-34.
Gonglewski, M. R. (1999). Linking the internet to the national standards for foreign language learning. Foreign Language Annals, 32 (3), 348-362.
González-Bueno, M. (1998). The effect of electronic mail on Spanish L2 discourse. Language Learning and Technology, 1 (2), 55-70. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/ vol1num2/article3/default.html
González-Bueno, M., & Pérez, L. (2000). Electronic mail in foreign language writing. Foreign Language Annals, 33 (2), 189-198.
ISTE (International Society for Technology in Education). (2000). National educational technology standards for students. Washington, DC: US Department of Education.
Kern, R. (1998). Technology, social interaction, and FL literacy. In J. A. Muyskens (Ed.), New ways of learning and teaching: Focus on technology and foreign language education (pp. 57-92). Boston: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
Kost, C., Foss, P., & Lenzini, J. (1999). Textual and pictorial gloss: Effectiveness on incidental vocabulary growth when reading in a foreign language. Foreign Language Annals, 32 (1), 89-113.
Martinez-Lage, A. (1997). Hypermedia technology for teaching reading. In M. Bush & R. Terry (Eds.), Issues and emerging ideas for teaching of foreign languages (pp. 121-163), Lincolnwood, IL: National Textbook Company.
Mayer, E., & Sims, K. (1994). For whom is a picture worth a thousand words? Extensions of a dual-coding theory of multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86 (3), 389-401.
Maynor, N. (1994). The language of electronic mail: Written speech? In G. Little & M. Montgomery (Eds.), Centennial usage studies (pp. 48-54). American Dialect Society.
NCATE (National Accreditation Council for Teachers’ Education). (2000). Standards. Retrieved from http://www.ncate.org/2000/unit_stnds_2002. Washington, D.C.
Pérez, L. C. (2000). Electronic mail, an extension of my Spanish class boundaries? Cincinnati Romance Review, 19, 138-145.
Pérez, L. C., & González-Bueno, M. (2001, February). Electronic mail in foreign language writing revisited. Paper presented at the National TESOL Convention, St. Louis, MO.
Salaberry, M. R. (2000). Pedagogical design of computer mediated communication tasks: Learning objectives and technological capabilities. Modern Language Journal, 84 (i), 28-37.
Sotillo, S. M. (2000). Discourse functions and syntactic complexity in synchronous and asynchronous communication. Language Learning and Technology, 4 (1), 82119. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/vol4num1/sotillo/default.html
St. John, E., & Cash, D. (1996). Language learning via e-mail: Demonstrable success with German. In M. Warschauer (Ed.), Virtual connections: Online activities and projects for networking language learners (pp. 191-197). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii, Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center.
Timpson, W. M. (1999). Metateaching and the instructional msap. Madison, WI: Artwood Publishing.
Van Handle, D. C., & Corl, K. A. (1998). Extending the dialogue: Using electronic mail and the Internet to promote conversation and writing in intermediate level German language courses. CALICO Journal, 15 (1-3), 129-142.
Wang, Y. M. (1994). Email dialogue journaling in an ESL reading and writing classroom. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon, Eugene.
Warschauer, M. (Ed.). (1996). Virtual connections: Online activities and projects for networking language learners. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii, Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center.
