Flaming in CMC

Prometheus' Fire or Inferno's?

Authors

  • Zsuzsanna Ittzes Abrams University of Texas at Austin

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v20i2.245-260

Keywords:

Computer-mediated Communication, Flaming, Communicative Competence, Authentic Language

Abstract

Research on the use of computer-mediated communication (CMC) without exception supports its cognitive and affective benefits for foreign language (L2) learning (Beauvois, 1995, 1997; Blake 2000; Swaffar, 1998). Studies both in L1 and L2 contexts especially draw attention to its ability to promote more democratic discourse patterns than face-to-face classroom interaction (Batson, 1993; Chun, 1994; Kern, 1995). Sproull and Kiesler (1991) claim that people feel more at liberty expressing themselves without fear of social approbation because the typical social norms of face-to-face interactions do not apply to this communicative environment. However, while CMC's liberating effects have been mostly welcome, a less desirable one has also emerged: flaming. While flaming, which refers to aggressive interpersonal behavior and rude language (Miller, 1993), has been addressed in L1 academic and nonacademic contexts, it has not yet been a focus of discussion in L2 circles. The present article, based on a descriptive study with 75 intermediate learners of college German participating in two sessions of synchronous CMC during the course of a semester, investigates students' flaming behavior, and shows that not only is flaming a very infrequent occurrence, it can even be harnessed for the development of authentic communicative and interactive competence.

Author Biography

  • Zsuzsanna Ittzes Abrams, University of Texas at Austin

    Zsuzsanna Ittzes Abrams (Ph.D., University of Arizona, 1997) is Assistant Professor of German and Director of the Basic Language Program in the Department of Germanic Studies at the University of Texas at Austin

References

Batson, T. (1993). The origins of ENFI. In B. C. Bruce, J. Kreeft Peyton, & T. Batson (Eds.), Network-based classrooms: Promises and realities. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Beauvois, M. H. (1995). E-talk: Attitudes and motivation in computer-assisted classroom discussion. Computers and the Humanities, 28, 177-190.

Beauvois, M. H. (1997). Write to speak: The effects of electronic communication on the oral achievement of fourth semester French students. In J. Muyskens (Ed.), New ways of learning and teaching: Issues in language program direction. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.

Beauvois, M. H. (1998). Conversations in slow motion: Computer-mediated communication in the foreign language classroom. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 54 (2), 198-217.

Blake, R. (2000). Computer-mediated communication: A window on L2 Spanish interlanguage. Language Learning & Technology [online], 4 (1), 120-136. Available: llt.msu.edu

Bruce, B. C., & Kreeft Peyton, J. (1993). A Situated evaluation of ENFI. In B. C. Bruce, J. Kreeft Peyton, & T. Batson (Eds.), Network-based classrooms: Promises and realities (pp. 33-49). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Chun, D. (1994). Using computer networking to facilitate the acquisition of interactive competence. System, 22 (1), 17-31.

Eder, D. (1993). “Go Get Ya a French!”: Romantic and sexual teasing among adolescent girls. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Gender and conversational interaction. New York: Oxford University Press.

Kemp, F. (1993). The origins of ENFI, network theory, and computer-based collaborative writing instruction at the University of Texas. In B. C. Bruce, J. Kreeft Peyton, & T. Batson (Eds.), Network-based classrooms: Promises and realities (pp. 161-180). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Kern, R. G. (1995). Restructuring classroom interaction with networked computers: Effects on quantity and characteristics of language production. Modern Language Journal, 79, 457-476.

Kiesler, S., Siegel, J., & McGuire, T. W. (1984). Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist, 39 (10), 1123-1134.

Kiesler, S., Zubrow, D., Moses, A. M., & Geller, V. (1985). Affect in computer-mediated communication: An experiment in synchronous terminal-to-terminal discussion. Human-Computer Interaction, 1, 77-104.

Kreeft Peyton, J., & Bruce, B. C. (1993). Understanding the multiple threads of networkbased classrooms. In B. C. Bruce, J. Kreeft Peyton, & T. Batson (Eds.), Network-based classrooms: Promises and realities (pp. 50-64). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Kremers, M. (1993). Student authority and teacher freedom: ENFI at New York Institute of Technology. In B. C. Bruce, J. Kreeft Peyton, & T. Batson (Eds.), Networkbased classrooms: Promises and realities (pp. 113-123). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Miller, J. D. (1993). Script writing on a computer network: Quenching the flames or feeding the fire? In B. C. Bruce, J. Kreeft Peyton, & T. Batson (Eds.), Network-based classrooms: Promises and realities (pp. 124-137). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Oxford-Duden German Dictionary. (1997). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Sirc, G. & Reynolds, T. (1993). Seeing students as writers. In B. C. Bruce, J. Kreeft Peyton, & T. Batson (Eds.), Network-based classrooms: Promises and realities (pp. 138-160). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1991). Connections: New ways of working in the networked organization. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Sullivan, N., & Pratt, E. (1996). A comparative study of two ESL writing environments: A computer-assisted classroom and a traditional oral classroom. System, 29 (4), 491-501.

Swaffar, J. (1998). Networking language learning: Introduction. In J. Swaffar, S. Romero, P. Markley, & K. Arens (Eds.), Language learning online: Theory and practice in the ESL and L2 computer classroom. Austin: Labyrinth Publications.

Thompson, D. (1993). One ENFI path: From Gallaudet to distance learning. In B. C. Bruce, J. Kreeft Peyton, & T. Batson (Eds.), Network-based classrooms: Promises and realities (pp. 210-227). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Warschauer, M. (1996). Comparing face-to-face and electronic communication in the second language classroom. CALICO Journal, 13, 7-26.

Warschauer, M. (1997). Computer-mediated collaborative learning: Theory and practice. Modern Language Journal, 81, 470-481.

Warschauer, M., & Kern, R. (Eds.). (2000). Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Zuboff, S. (1989). In the age of the smart machine. New York: Basic Books.

Downloads

Published

2013-01-14

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Ittzes Abrams, Z. (2013). Flaming in CMC: Prometheus’ Fire or Inferno’s?. CALICO Journal, 20(2), 245-260. https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v20i2.245-260

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >>