Learning French Pronunciation
Audiocassettes or Multimedia?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v20i2.215-336Keywords:
Multimedia, Pronunciation, Phonetics Learning, Authoring SoftwareAbstract
Phonetics, intonation, and pronunciation are integral parts of language learning. However, they are not often an actual part of the content of language classes. One reason may be that teachers are not necessarily trained in phonetics and therefore are reluctant to make this component a part of their teaching. Another reason may be that the proper tools are not being used or that the proper tools are not being used appropriately in order to assist teachers and students in integrating phonetics into the curriculum. This article describes a two phase experiment that was conducted at the University of Ottawa using audiocassettes and multimedia while teaching French, specifically French phonetics, intonation, and pronunciation, to a group of low-intermediate level language students. The present study addresses three questions: (a) Are the receptive and productive skills of intermediate-level learners of French as a second language influenced by the explicit teaching of phonetic and prosodic elements? (b) if so, which delivery mode is the most effective to teach these elements: audio cassettes or multimedia? and (c) what are the students' preferences with regards to these two delivery modes?
References
Anderson-Hsieh, J. (1994). Interpreting visual feedback on suprasegmentals in computer assisted pronunciation instruction. CALICO Journal, 11 (4), 5-22.
Bagui, S. (1998). Reasons for increased learning using multimedia. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 7 (1), 3-18.
Bernstein, L., & Christian, B. (1996). For speech perceptions by humans or machines, three senses are better than one. In ICSLP 96: Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (pp. 1477-1480). Philadephia, PA.
Bratu, R. (2000). L’enseignement informatisé de la prononciation et ses répercussions sur l’apprentissage de nouveaux sons du français standard chez les apprenants anglophones. Paper presented at the meeting of the Canadian Association of Applied Linguistics. Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Cazade, A. (1999). De l’usage des courbes sonores et autres supports graphiques pour aider l’apprenant en langues. Alsic: Apprentissage des Langues et Système d’information et de Communication [online], 2 (2), 3-31. Available: alsic.org or alsic.u-strasbg.fr
Compain, J. , Courchêne, R., Knoerr, H., & Weinberg, A. (1999). A bon port. Scarborough, Ontario: Prentice Hall Canada, Inc.
Davidson, M., Knoerr, H., & Weinberg, A. (1995). Ficelle. Editions Nora Médialangue. Available: aix1.uottawa.ca/~weinberg/ficelle.html
De Bot, K. (1983). Visual feedback of intonation 1: Effectiveness and induced practice behavior. Language and Speech, 26, 331-350.
De Bot, K., & Mailfert, K. (1982). The teaching of intonation: Fundamental research and classroom applications. TESOL Quarterly, 16, 71-77.
Denis, F., & Soneson, D. ( 2001, March). Phonagogue—A template for phonetics activities. Paper presented at the meeting of the Computer-Assisted Language Instruction Consortium (CALICO), Orlando, Florida.
Ehsani, F., & Knodt, E. (1998). Speech technology in computer-aided language learning: Strengths and limitations of a new CALL paradigm. Language Learning & Technology [online], 2 (1). 5-60. Available: llt.msu.edu
Germain, A., & Martin, P. (2000). Présentation d’un logiciel de visualisation pour l’apprentissage de l’oral en langue seconde. Alsic: Apprentissage des Langues et Système d’information et de Communication [online], 3 (1), 61-76. Available: alsic.org or alsic.u-strasbg.fr
Hengstenberg, P. (1980). Suprasegmentalia und Aspekte ihrer Vermittlung in sprachlichen Lehr- und Lernprozessen. Tübingen: Narr.
James, E. (1976). The acquisition of prosodic features of speech using a speech visualizer. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 14 (3), 227-243.
James, E. (1977). The acquisition of second language intonation using a visualizer. Canadian Modern Language Review, 33 (4), 503-506.
James, E. (1979). Intonation through visualization. In H. Hollien, & P. Hollien (Eds.), Current Issues in the Phonetic Sciences (pp. 295-301). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kawai, G., & Hirose, K. (1997). A CALL system using speech recognition to train the pronunciation of Japanese long vowels, the mora nasal and mora obstruents. Proceedings of Eurospeech (pp. 657-660). Rhodes, Greece.
Knoerr, H. (2000). Pratique intonative et utilisation d’un logiciel de visualisation dans un cours de prononciation en français langue seconde: une étude descriptive. Revue canadienne de linguistique appliquée, 3 (1-2), 2000.
Knoerr, H., & Weinberg, A. (1999). A bon port—Cahier d’activités. Scarborough, Ontario: Prentice Hall Canada, Inc.
Lane, H., & Buiten, R. (1969). A self-instructional device for conditioning accurate prosody. In A. Valdman (Ed.), Trends in language teaching (pp. 159-174). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Léon, P., & Martin, P. (1972). Applied linguistics and the teaching of intonation. Modern Language Journal, 56, 139-44.
Manuel, S. (1990). Speech communication report (Progress Report No. 133). Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, The Research Laboratory of Electronics.
Markham, D., & Nagano-Madesen, Y. (1996). Input modality effects in foreign accent. In H. T. Bunnell & W. Idsardi (Eds.), ICSLP 96: Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (pp. 1473-1476). Philadephia, PA: Applied Science and Engineering Laboratories, Alfred E. DuPont Institute.
Molholt, G. (1990). Spectrographic analysis and patterns in pronunciation. Computers and the Humanities, 24, 81-92.
Monville-Burston, M. (2001) Review of The Rhythm of French. CALICO Journal, 18 (3), 665-683.
Murakawa H., & Lambacher, S.(1996). Improving Japanese pronunciation of American English [r] using electronic visual feedback. In Center for Language Research 1995 Annual Review. University of Aizu, Japan.
Pennington, M. C., & Esling, J. H. (1996). Computer-assisted development of spoken language skills. In Pennington, M. C. (Ed.), The Power of Call (pp. 153-189). Houston, TX: Athelsan.
Reeser, T. W. (2002). Review of Tell me more-French. CALICO Journal, 19 (2), 419-428.
Renie, D. (1998). Analyse de The Rhythm of French. Alsic: Apprentissage des Langues et Système d’information et de Communication [online], 1 (2), 171-177. Available: alsic.org or alsic.u-strasbg.fr
Rochet, B. L. (1994). The efficient use of the computer in L2 pronunciation instruction. In F. L. Borchardt & E. Johnson (Eds.), Proceedings of the 1994 CALICO annual symposium: Human factors (pp. 178-182). Durham, NC: CALICO.
Spodark, E. (2002). Review of Ça sonne français. CALICO Journal, 19 (2), 429-439.
Stenson, N., Downing, B., Smith J., & Smith, K. (1992). The effectiveness of computerassisted pronunciation training. CALICO Journal, 9 (4), 5-20.
Taggart, G. (Producer & Director). (1980). Les voyelles du français [video]. (Available from Cinédessins, Enreg., 1041 Newport Avenue, Victoria, British Columbia, V8S 5E2, Canada)
Vardanian, R. M. (1964). Teaching English through oscilloscope displays. Language Learning, 14 (3/4), 109-118.
Wichern, P. U. M., & Boves, L. (1980). Visual feedback of Fo curves as an aid in learning intonation-contours. In Proceedings Institute of Phonetics Nijmegen, 4 (pp. 53-63). University of Nijmegen: Nijmegen, Holland.
Yamada, R. A., Tohkura, Y., Bradlow, A. R., & Pisoni. D. B. (1996). Does training in speech perception modify speech production? In ICSLP 96: Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing. Philadephia, PA. Available: www.asel.udel.edu/icslp/cdrom/vol2/277/a277.pdf
