Concordance-Based Glosses for Academic Vocabulary Acquisition
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.29.4.679-693Keywords:
concordance, gloss, annotation, vocabulary acquisition, learner attitudesAbstract
This study compares the effectiveness of online textual glosses enhanced with modified corpus-extracted sentences presented in concordance lines and textual glosses enhanced with dictionary definitions drawn from an online learner’s dictionary for academic vocabulary learning at higher proficiency levels. Particularly, the study aimed to determine which textual gloss technique would be most beneficial in helping intermediate to advanced language learners, who likely possess foundational receptive knowledge, i.e. they recognize the word and know the definition, gain productive knowledge of academic lexical items. While the usefulness of multimedia and image-based glosses are not disputed, lexical items from an academic word list may not be easily glossed through these techniques, and the development of a concordance-based modality may prove beneficial for more proficient learners seeking productive vocabulary knowledge. Also investigated were learner attitudes towards the textual annotation techniques. Participants in both experimental groups exhibited post test gains in receptive and judgment tasks, but only the concordance-based group displayed improvement on the productive assessment. Further, the concordance-based group responded that the glosses were beneficial and likely to be used for subsequent language study, while the dictionary group indicated the glosses would not be later used as the annotations were perceived as ineffective.
References
Abraham, L. (2007). Computer-mediated glosses in second language reading comprehension and vocabulary learning: A meta-analysis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(3), 199-226.
Akbulut, Y. (2007). Effects of multimedia annotations on incidental vocabulary learning and reading comprehension of advanced learners of English as a foreign language. Instructional Science, 35(6), 499-517.
Al-Seghayer, K. (2001) The effects of multimedia annotations on L2 vocabulary acquisition: A comparative study. Language Learning and Technology, 5(1), 202-232.
Ariew, R., & Ercetin, G. (2004). Exploring the potential of hypermedia annotations for second language reading. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 17(2), 237-259.
Beheydt, L. (1987). The semantization of vocabulary in foreign language learning. System, 15(1), 55-67.
Brett, P. (1998). Using multimedia: A descriptive investigation of incidental language learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 11(2), 179-200.
Chun, D., & Plass, J. (1996). Facilitating reading comprehension with multimedia. System, 24(4), 503-519.
Cobb, T. (1997). Is there any measurable learning from hands-on concordancing? System, 25(3), 301-315.
Cobb, T. (1999). Breadth and depth of lexical acquisition with hands-on concordancing. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 12(4), 345-360.
Coxhead, A. (2000). A new academic word list. TESOL Quarterly, 34(2), 213-238.
Davies, Mark. (2008). The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA): 410+ million words, 1990-present. Available online at http://corpus.byu.edu/coca/.
Davis, J. N., & Lyman-Hager, M. (1997). Computers and L2 reading: Student performance, student attitudes. Foreign Language Annals, 30(1), 58-72.
DeRidder, I. (2002). Visible or invisible links: Does the highlighting of hyperlinks affect incidental vocabulary learning, text comprehension, and the reading process? Language Learning & Technology, 6(1), 123-146.
Ercetin, G. (2003). Exploring ESL learners’ use of hypermedia reading glosses. CALICO Journal 20(2), 261-283.
Haywood, S. (n.d.). Academic Vocabulary. Retrieved from www.nottingham.ac.uk/~alzsh3/acvocab/texts.htm
Horst, M., Cobb, T., Nicolae, I. (2005). Expanding academic vocabulary with an interactive online database. Language Learning and Technology, 9(2), 90-110.
Hulstijn, J. (1992). When do foreign-language readers look up the meaning of unfamiliar words? The influence of task and learner variables. The Modern Language Journal, 77(2), 139-147.
Hulstijn, J. (1993). Retention of inferred and given meanings: Experiments in incidental vocabulary learning. In P. J. L. Arnaud & H. Bejoint (Eds.), Vocabulary and applied linguistics (pp 113-125). London: Macmillan.
Hulstijn, J., Hollander, M., & Griendanus, T. (1996). Incidental vocabulary learning by advanced foreign language students: The influence of marginal glosses, dictionary use, and reoccurrence of unknown words. The Modern Language Journal, 80(3), 327-339.
Hulstijn, J., & Laufer, B. (2001). Some empirical evidence for the involvement load hypothesis in vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning, 51(3), 539-558.
Johns, T. (1986). Micro-concord: A language learner’s research tool. System, 14(2), 151-162.
Johns, T. (1994). From printout to handout: Grammar and vocabulary teaching in the context of datadriven learning. In T. Odlin (Ed.), Perspectives on pedagogical grammar (pp 293-314). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kaur, J., & Hegelmeir, K. (2005). ESL students’ use of concordance in the transfer of academic word knowledge: An exploratory study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 18(4), 287-310.
Koren, S. (1999). Vocabulary instruction through hypertext: Are there advantages over conventional teaching methods of teaching? TESL-EJ, 4(1). Retrieved August 8,2012, from http://www.teslej.org/wordpress/issues/volume4/ej13/ej13a2/
Kost, C. R., Foss, P., & Lenzini, J. J. (1999). Textual and pictorial glosses: Effectiveness on incidental vocabulary growth when reading in a foreign language. Foreign Language Annals, 32(1), 89-97.
Krashen, S. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. New York: Longman.
Leffa, V. J. (1992). Making foreign language texts comprehensible for beginners: An experiment with an electronic glossary. System, 20(1), 63-73.
Lenders, O. (2008). Electronic glossing—Is it worth the effort? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(5), 457-481.
Lin, C. C., & Huang, H. M. (2008). Meaning-inferred gloss and meaning-given gloss on incidental vocabulary learning. Journal of National Taiwan Normal University: Humanities & Social Sciences, 53(2), 87-116.
Lomicka, L. (1998). To gloss or not to gloss: An investigation of reading comprehension online. Language Learning and Technology, 1(2), 41-50.
Lyman-Hager, M. A., & Davis, J. (1996). The case for computer-mediated reading: Une vie de boy. The French Review, 69(5), 775-792.
Lyman-Hager, M., Davis, N., Burnett, J., & Chennault, R. (1993). Une vie de boy: Interactive reading in French. In F. L. Borchardt & E. M. T. Johnson (Eds.), Proceedings of CALICO 1993 Annual Symposium on Assessment (pp 93-97). Durham, NC: Duke University.
Ma, Q., & Kelly, P. (2006). Computer assisted vocabulary learning: Design and evaluation. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 19(1), 15-45.
Nagata, N. (1999). The effectiveness of computer-assisted interactive glosses. Foreign Language Annals, 32(4), 469-479.
Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Plass, J., Chun, D., Mayer, M., & Leutner, D. (1998). Supporting visual and verbal learning preferences in a second-language multimedia learning environment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(1), 25-36.
Schmitt, N. (2000). Vocabulary in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Yoon, H., & Hirvela, A. (2004). ESL student attitudes toward corpus use in L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(4), 257-283.
Yoshii, M. (2006). L1 and L2 glosses: Their effects on incidental vocabulary learning. Language Learning and Technology, 10(3), 85-101.
Yoshii, M., & Flaitz, J. (2002). Second language incidental vocabulary retention: The effect of text and picture annotation types. CALICO Journal, 20(1), 33-58.
Xu, J. (2010). Using multimedia vocabulary annotations in L2 reading and listening activities. CALICO Journal, 27(2), 311-327.
