Web 2.0 and Second Language Learning
What Does The Research Tell Us?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.29.3.412-430Keywords:
technology, Web 2.0, second language learning, literature reviewAbstract
This article reviews research on the use of Web 2.0 technologies in second language learning. Its purpose is to explore the current state of research on this topic, to investigate the theoretical perspectives framing the current research, to identify some of the benefits of using Web 2.0 technologies in second language learning, and to discuss some of the limitations of existing research. The review of research found that blogs and wikis have been the most studied Web 2.0 tools, while others, such as social networking applications and virtual worlds, have been less frequently explored. In addition, the most commonly investigated languages have been English as a Second/Foreign Language (ESL/EFL), Spanish, German and French. Considerably less research has been conducted on applying Web 2.0 technologies to less commonly taught languages, such as Arabic, Chinese, or Russian. Additionally, the language learning environments afforded by Web 2.0 technologies have greatly broadened the scope of topics explored in computer-assisted language learning (CALL): from earlier research which tended to concentrate on the traditional four language skills, to more recent topics such as learners’ identities, online collaboration, and learning communities. Although very few studies surveyed have actually examined students’ progress and learning outcomes associated with these tools, the most frequently reported benefit associated with Web 2.0 technologies is the favorable language learning environments they help to foster. Finally, this review found that much research on Web 2.0 technology and language learning is not clearly grounded in theory, and that a number of studies suffer from a set of common methodological limitations.
References
Abdous, M., Camarena, M. M., & Facer, B. R. (2009). MALL technology: Use of academic podcasting in the foreign language classroom. ReCALL, 21(1), 76-95.
Alm, A. (2009). Blogging for self-determination with L2 learner journals. In M. Thomas (Ed.), Handbook of research on Web 2.0 and second language learning (pp. 202-221). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
Antenos-Conforti, E. (2009). Microblogging on Twitter: Social networking in intermediate Italian classes. In L. Lomicka & G. Lord (Eds.), The next generation: Social networking and online collaboration in foreign language learning (pp. 59-90). San Marcos, Texas: CALICO.
Armstrong, K., & Retterer, O. (2008). Blogging as L2 writing: A case study. AACE Journal, 16(3), 233-251.
Arnold, N., Ducate, L., & Kost, C. (2009). Collaborative writing in wikis: Insights from culture projects in intermediate German classes. In L. Lomicka & G. Lord (Eds.), The next generation: Social networking and online collaboration in foreign language learning (pp. 115-144). San Marcos, Texas: CALICO.
Baten, L., Bouckaert, N., & Kan, Y. (2009). The use of communities in a virtual learning environment. In M. Thomas (Ed.), Handbook of research on Web 2.0 and second language learning (pp. 137-155). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
Bax, S. (2003). CALL: Past, present and future. System, 31(1), 13-28.
Benito-Ruiz, E. (2009). Infoxication 2.0. In M. Thomas (Ed.), Handbook of research on Web 2.0 and second language learning (pp. 60-79). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
Bloch, J. (2008). From the special issue editor. Language Learning & Technology, 12(2), 2–6.
Block, D. (2003). The social turn in second language acquisition. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Brecht, R. D., & Walton, A. R. (1994). National strategic planning in the less commonly taught languages. NFLC Occasional Papers. Washington, DC: National Foreign Language Center.
Castaneda Vise, D. A. (2008). The effects of wiki- and blog-technologies on the students' performance when learning the preterit and imperfect aspects in Spanish. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section A. The Humanities and Social Sciences, 69 (01), 0187.
Chapelle, C. A. (2001). Computer applications in second language acquisition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Chapelle, C. A. (2009). The relationship between second Language acquisition theory and computerassisted language learning. The Modern Language Journal, 93, 741–753.
Chen, Y. (2009). The effect of applying wikis in an English as a foreign language (EFL) class in Taiwan (Doctoral Dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (Accession No. 200920820)
Chinnery, G. M. (2008). You've got some GALL: Google-assisted language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 12(1), 3–11.
Choi, J. (2009). Asian English language learners' identity construction in an after school literacy site. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 19(1), 130-161.
Davis, K. A. (1995). Qualitative theory and methods in applied linguistics research. TESOL Quarterly, 29, 427-453.
Deutschmann, M., Panichi, L., & Molka-Danielsen, J. (2009). Designing oral participation in Second Life — A comparative study of two language proficiency courses. ReCALL, 21(2), 206–226. doi:10.1017/S0958344009000196
Diehl, W. C., & Prins, E. (2008). Unintended outcomes in Second Life: Intercultural literacy and cultural identity in a virtual world. Language and Intercultural Communication, 8(2), 101-118. doi: 10.1080/14708470802139619
Dippold, D. (2009). Peer feedback through blogs: Student and teacher perceptions in an advanced German class. ReCALL, 21(1), 18-36.
Ducate, C. L., & Lomicka, L. L. (2005). Exploring the blogosphere: Use of Web logs in the foreign language classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 38(3), 410-421.
Ducate, C. L., & Lomicka, L. L. (2008). Adventures in the blogosphere: From blog readers to blog writers. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(1), 9-28.
Duff, P. (2006). Beyond generalizability: Contextualization, complexity, and credibility in applied linguistics research. In M. Chalhoub-Deville, C. Chapelle & P. Duff (Eds.), Inference and generalizability in applied linguistics: Multiple perspectives (pp. 65 -95). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Edge, J., & Richards, K. (1998). 'May I see your warrant, please?': Justifying claims in qualitative research. Applied Linguistics, 19(3), 334-356.
Egbert, J., Huff, L., McNeil, L., Preuss, C., & Sellen, J. (2009). Pedagogy, process, and classroom context: Integrating teacher voice and experience into research on technology-enhanced language learning. The Modern Language Journal, 93, 754–768.
Elola, I., & Oskoz, A. (2008). Blogging: Fostering intercultural competence development in foreign language and study abroad contexts. Foreign Language Annals, 41(3), 454-477. doi:10.1111/j.1944-9720.2008.tb03307.x
Firth, A., & Wagner, J. (1997). On discourse, communication, and (some) fundamental concepts in SLA research. The Modern Language Journal, 81(3), 285-300.
Garrett, N. (2009). Computer-assisted language learning trends and issues revisited: Integrating innovation. The Modern Language Journal, 93, 719–740.
Godwin-Jones, R. (2006). Tag clouds in the blogosphere: Electronic literacy and social networking. Language Learning & Technology, 10(2), 8–15.
Godwin-Jones, R. (2008). Web-writing 2.0: Enabling, documenting, and assessing writing online. Language Learning & Technology, 12(2), 7–13.
Halvorsen, A. (2009). Social networking sites and critical language learning. In M. Thomas (Ed.), Handbook of research on Web 2.0 and second language learning (pp. 237-255). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
Harrison, R., & Thomas, M. (2009). Identity in online communities: Social networking sites and language learning. International Journal of Emerging Technologies & Society, 7(2), 109–124.
Huh, K., & Hu, W-C. (2005). Criteria for effective CALL research. In J. L. Egbert & G. M. Petrie (Eds.), CALL research perspectives (pp. 9-21). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
