Glossing Frequency and L2 Reading Comprehension
The Influence of CALL Glossing
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.31.3.374-389Keywords:
L2 reading comprehension, meta-analysis, attentional awareness, glosses, glossing, L1 glossingAbstract
This study challenges the assertion that an increase in L1 glossing results in more L2 reading comprehension. The results of this study, a quantitative meta-analysis, indicate that there is a significant difference (p = .04) in L2 reading comprehension between groups based on how much L1 glossing is provided. It was found that the group with the highest average effect size–which had all computer-assisted language learning (CALL) studies–included studies with 50% or more L1 glossing. However, the second largest mean effect size came from a group that contained 5% or less L1 glossing. In looking across groups in this meta-analysis, it was found that of the six studies with the largest effect sizes, five of them were CALL studies. In light of this finding, this paper will discuss the interaction of the variables of CALL glossing and percentage of text glossed in order to determine their possible influence on L2 reading comprehension.
References
Abraham, L. B. (2007). Second language reading comprehension and vocabulary learning withmultimedia. Hispania, 90, 98-109.
*Al-Jabri, S. S. (2009). The effects of L1 and L2 glosses on reading comprehension of recalling ideas by Saudi students. Umm Al-Qura University Journal of Social Sciences, 1, 10-27. Retrieved from http://libback.uqu.edu.sa/hipres/MAGZ/3500001-6.PDF
*Aweiss, S. (1994). Situating learning in technology: The case of computer-mediated reading supports. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 23, 63-74. doi: 10.2190/FWEF-TH4H495C-YF45
*Azari, F. (2012). Gloss or no gloss? EFL learners’ preference. American International Journal of Social Science. 1, 75-85.
*Baumann, C. C. (1994). The effect of previews and glosses on the reading comprehension of beginning and intermediate students of German (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Minnesota.
Bell, F. L., & LeBlanc, L. B. (2000). The language of glosses in L2 reading on computer: Learners’ preferences. Hispania, 83, 274-285. doi: 10.2307/346199
Bernhardt, E. B. (1983). Testing foreign language reading comprehension: The immediate recall protocol. Die Unterrichtspraxis, 16, 27-33. doi: 10.2307/3530598
Bernhardt, E. B. (1991). Reading development in a second language: Theoretical, empirical and classroom perspectives. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Bernhardt, E. B., & Kamil, M. L. (1995). Interpreting relationships between L1 and L2 reading: Consolidating the linguistic threshold and the linguistic interdependence hypotheses. Applied Linguistics, 16, 15-34. doi: 10.1093/applin/16.1.15
Bowles, M. A. (2004). L2 glossing: To CALL or not to CALL. Hispania, 87, 541-552. doi: 10.2307/20063060
Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand McNally.
*Cheng, Y., & Good, R. L. (2009). L1 glosses: Effects on EFL learners’ reading comprehension and vocabulary retention. Reading in a Foreign Language, 21, 119-142.
Chun, D. M., & Plass, J. L. (1996). Effects of multimedia annotations on vocabulary acquisition. Modern Language Journal, 80, 183-198.
Comprehensive Meta-Analysis version 2.2 [Computer software]. (2010). Englewood, NJ. Biostat.
Cook, V. (2001). Using the first language in the classroom. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 57, 402-422. doi: 10.3138/cmlr.57.3.402
*Coriano Velázquez, A. (2001). Vocabulary acquisition through reading: A study of the effectiveness of different CALL based annotations. Master’s Abstracts International, 40, 561. (UMI No. 1406590)
*Davis, J. N. (1989). Facilitating effects of marginal glosses on foreign language reading. The Modern Language Journal, 73, 41-48. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1989.tb05308.x
Ellis, R. (1997). SLA research and language teaching. Hong Kong: Oxford.
Eskey, D. E. (1988). Holding in the bottom. In P. L. Carrell, J. Devine, & D. E. Eskey (Eds.), Interactive approaches to second language reading (pp. 93-100). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Farvardin, M. T., & Biria, R. (2012). The impact of gloss types on Iranian EFL students’ reading comprehension and lexical retention. International Journal of Instruction, 5, 99-114.
Gass, S. M., & Selinker, L. (1994). Second language acquisition: An introductory course. Earlbaum: New Jersey.
*Goyette, E. S. (1995). The effects of dictionary usage on text comprehension (Doctoral dissertation, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada). Retrieved from http://digitool.library.mcgill.ca/R/QLPEN4Q98ALTDL54UK5LX2672IKRSBCPTE3VKIISRGENVJBY6Q05129?func=results-full
Glass, G. V., McGaw, B., & Smith, M. L. (1981). Meta-analysis in social research. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Hayden, S. (1997). An investigation into the effect and patterns of usage of a computer-mediated text in reading comprehension in French (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Hu, M., & Nation, I. S. P. (2000). Unknown vocabulary density and reading comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language, 13, 403-430.
*Jacobs, G. M. (1994). What lurks in the margin: Use of vocabulary glosses as a strategy in second language reading. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 5, 115-137.
*Jacobs, G. M., Dufon, P., & Hong, F. G. (1994). L1 and L2 vocabulary glosses in L2 reading passages: Their effectiveness for increasing comprehension and vocabulary knowledge. Journal of Research in Reading, 17, 19-28. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9817.1994.tb00049.x
*Joyce, E. E. (1997). Which words should be glossed in L2 reading materials? A study of first, second and third semester French students’ recall. Pennsylvania Language Forum, 58-64. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 427508)
Kern, R. G. (1994). The role of mental translation in second language reading. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 441-461. doi: 10.1017/S0272263100013450
*Knight, S. (1994). Dictionary use while reading: The effects on comprehension and vocabulary acquisition for students of different verbal abilities. The Modern Language Journal, 78, 285-299. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1994.tb02043.x
*Ko, M. H. (1995). Glossing in incidental and intentional learning of foreign language vocabulary and reading comprehension (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Hawai’i, Manoa, Oahu.
*Ko, M. H. (2005). Glosses, comprehension, and strategy use. Reading in a Foreign Language, 17,
Retrieved from http://nflrc.hawaii.edu/rfl/October2005/ko/ko.html.
*Kwong-Hung, L. (1995). Bilingual Texts: A study of the effects of providing L1 Chinese terms in L2 English texts on text comprehension and on English vocabulary acquisition (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong.
Laufer, B. (1996). The lexical threshold of second language reading comprehension: What it is and how it relates to L1 reading ability. Jyvaskyla Cross-Language Studies, 17, 55-62.
Laufer, B., & Ravenhorst-Kalovski, G. C. (2010). Lexical threshold revisited: Lexical text coverage, learners’ vocabulary size and reading comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language, 22, 15-30.
Lee, J. F., & VanPatten, B. (1995). Making communicative language teaching happen. New York:
McGraw-Hill.
Lomicka, L. L. (1998). To gloss or not to gloss: An investigation of reading comprehension online.
Language Learning and Technology, 1, 41-50.
*Luo, J. (1993). A study of the effects of marginal glosses on the reading comprehension of
intermediate college students of French (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of
Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
*Martínez-Fernández, A. M. (2010). Experiences of remembering and knowing in SLA, L2 development
and text comprehension: A study of levels of awareness type of glossing and type of linguistic
item (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
Nation, I. S. P. (2006). How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening? The Canadian
Modern Language Review, 63, 59-82. doi: 10.3138/cmlr.63.1.59
*Palmer, R. C. (2003). A comparison of the effect of glossed self-instruction reading materials and
traditional teacher fronted instruction (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Indiana University
of Pennsylvania, Indiana, PA.
Prichard, C., & Matsumoto, Y. (2011). The effect of lexical coverage and dictionary use on L2 reading
comprehension. The Reading Matrix, 11, 207-225.
*Salem, E. B. (2006). The influence of electronic glosses on word retention and reading
comprehension with Spanish Language Learners (Unpublished doctoral dissertation).
University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS.
Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 1,
-158. doi: 10.1093/applin/1.2.129
Schmidt, R. (1994). Implicit learning and the cognitive unconscious: Of artificial grammars and SLA.
In N. Ellis (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 165-209). London: Academic
Press.
Schmidt, R., & Frota, S. (1986). Developing basic conversational ability in a second language. In R.
Day (Ed.), Talking to learn (pp. 237-326). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
*Stoehr, L. E. (1999). The effects of built-in comprehension aids in a CALL program on studentreaders’ understanding of a foreign language (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of
Texas, Austin, TX.
Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer
(Eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics (pp. 125-144). Oxford: Oxford University
Press.
Swain, M. (1998). Focus on form through conscious reflection. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.),
Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 125-144). Oxford, UK: Oxford
University Press.
Taylor, A. (2002). A meta-analysis on the effects of L1 glosses on L2 reading comprehension
(Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
Taylor, A. (2006). The effects of CALL versus traditional L1 glosses on L2 reading comprehension. CALICO Journal, 23, 1-10.
Taylor, A. (2009). CALL-Based versus paper-based glosses: Is there a difference in reading comprehension? CALICO Journal, 27, 147-160.
Taylor, A. (2010). Glossing is sometimes a distraction: Comments on Cheng and Good (2009). Reading in a Foreign Language, 22, 353-354.
Taylor, A. (2013). CALL versus paper: In which context are L1 glosses more effective? CALICO Journal, 30, 63-81. doi: 10.11139/cj.30.1.63-81
*Yanguas, I. (2009). Multimedia glosses and their effects on L2 text comprehension and vocabulary learning. Language Learning and Technology, 13, 49-67.
