International Journal of Speech Language and the Law, Vol 25, No 2 (2018)

Sub-regional ‘other-accent’ effects on lay listeners’ speaker identification abilities: a voice line-up study with speakers and listeners from the North East of England

Almut Braun, Carmen Llamas, Dominic Watt, Peter French, Duncan Robertson
Issued Date: 7 Dec 2018


Previous studies have shown that listeners perform worse in speaker identification experiments when they are unfamiliar with the accents of the speakers. Such effects have been documented for listeners hearing unfamiliar foreign languages (language familiarity effect) and unfamiliar regional accents ('other-accent' effect). The present study investigates the 'other-accent' effect at a sub-regional level. Listeners from three different localities (Newcastle, Sunderland and Middlesbrough) within the same greater dialectal region (the North East of England) participated in one of three target-present voice line-ups using samples spoken by speakers from one of the three localities. Listeners who heard a voice line-up in their own local accent (ingroup listeners) missed the target speaker's voice significantly less often than listeners who heard a voice line-up comprised of speakers of one of the other two local accents (out-group listeners). The proportions of correct hits and false alarms were approximately similar across in-group and out-group listeners.

Download Media

PDF (Price: £17.50 )

DOI: 10.1558/ijsll.37340



Atkinson, J. (2011) Linguistic variation and change in a North-East border town: a sociolinguistic study of Darlington. PhD thesis, Newcastle University.

Atkinson, N. (2015) Variable factors affecting voice identification in forensic contexts. PhD thesis, University of York.

Beal, J. C., Burbano-Elizondo, L. and Llamas, C. (2012) Urban North-Eastern English. Tyneside to Teesside. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Braun, A. (2016) The Speaker Identification Ability of Blind and Sighted Listeners: An Empirical Investigation (Doctoral thesis, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Germany, 2015). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

Burbano-Elizondo, L. (2008) Language variation and identity in Sunderland. PhD thesis, University of Sheffield.

Campbell, I. (2007) Chi-squared and Fisher-Irwin tests of two-by-two tables with small sample recommendations. Statistics in Medicine 26(19): 3661–3675.

Chance, J. E. and Goldstein, A. G. (1981) Depth of processing in response to own- and other-race faces. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 7(3): 475–480.

Fecher, N. and Johnson, E. K. (2018) Effects of language experience and task demands on talker recognition by children and adults. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 143(4): 2409–2418.

Home Office. (2003) Advice on the use of voice identification parades. UK Home Office Circular 057/2003 from the Crime Reduction and Community Safety Group, Police Leadership and Power Unit.

Judd, C. M. and Park, B. (1988) Out-group homogeneity: judgments of variability at the individual and group levels. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(5): 778–788.

Kerstholt, J. H., Jansen, N. J. M., van Amelsvoort A. G. and Broeders, A. P. A. (2006) Earwitnesses: effects of accent, retention and telephone. Applied Cognitive Psychology 20(2): 187–197.

Kerswill, P. E. (1987) Levels of linguistic variation in Durham. Journal of Linguistics 23(1): 25–49.

Llamas, C. (2001) Language variation and innovation in Teesside English. PhD dissertation, University of Leeds.

Mathôt, S., Schreij, D. and Theeuwes, J. (2012) OpenSesame: an open-source, graphical experiment builder for the social sciences. Behavior Research Methods 44(2): 314–324.

Montgomery, C. (2007) Northern English dialects: a perceptual approach. PhD thesis, University of Sheffield.

Myers, D. G. (2001) Psychology. New York, NY. Worth Publishers.

Nolan, F. (2003) A recent voice parade. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law 10(2): 277–291.

Granhag, P. A., Eriksson, A. and Öhman, L. (2010) Mobile phone quality vs. direct quality: how the presentation format affects earwitness identification accuracy. European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context 2(2): 161–182.

Orchard, T. L. and Yarmey, A. D. (1995) The effects of whispers, voice-sample duration, and voice distinctiveness on criminal speaker identification. Applied Cognitive Psychology 9(3): 249–260.

Oxford English Dictionary (2018) Oxford University Press. Retrieved from on 30 September 2018.

Park, B. and Rothbart, M. (1982) Perception of out-group homogeneity and levels of social categorization: memory for the subordinate attributes of in-group and out-group members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 42(6): 1051–1068.

Richardson, J. T. E. (2011) The analysis of 2 × 2 contingency tables – Yet again. Statistics in Medicine 30(8): 890.

Stevenage, S. V., Clarke, G. and McNeill, A. (2012) The ‘other-accent’ effect in voice recognition. Journal of Cognitive Psychology 24(6): 647–653.

Stevenage, S. V. and Neil, G. J. (2014) Hearing faces and seeing voices: the integration and interaction of face and voice processing. Psychologica Belgica 54(3): 266–281.

Vanags, T., Carroll, M. and Perfect, T. J. (2005) Verbal overshadowing: a sound theory in voice recognition? Applied Cognitive Psychology 19(9): 1127–1144.

Vermeulen, J. (2018) Case Report. Constructing a voice line-up with multiple ear-witnesses. Paper presented at the 27th conference of the International Association for Forensic Phonetic and Acoustics, Huddersfield, UK.

Walker, P. M. and Tanaka, J. W. (2003) An encoding advantage for own-race versus other-race faces. Perception 32(9): 1117–1125.

Watt, D. (1998) Variation and change in the vowel system of Tyneside English. PhD dissertation, University of Newcastle upon Tyne.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Equinox Publishing Ltd - 415 The Workstation 15 Paternoster Row, Sheffield, S1 2BX United Kingdom
Telephone: +44 (0)114 221-0285 - Email:

Privacy Policy