The discursive construction of creativity as work in a tertiary art and design environment

Authors

  • Darryl Hocking AUT University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/japl.v7i2.235

Keywords:

discourse analysis, multi-perspectival, mixed-methodological, creativity, art education

Abstract

Central to most research in the field of creativity is the perception that creativity is an external and essentialist phenomenon. Recent studies, particularly in the area of art and design education, are beginning to question this understanding and seek alternative methods for exploring creativity. This paper takes the view that perceptions of creativity are historically and discursively constructed and that cultural shifts in the early twentieth century have more recently constituted the western understanding of creativity through a discourse of work. As an example, the paper will use a multi-perspectival analytical approach to explore the discursive construction of creativity as work in the situated context of a tertiary art and design studio environment. The paper concludes with a discussion of complications that may arise in the tertiary art and design environment as a result of the potential ambiguity created by the discourse of creativity as work.

Author Biography

  • Darryl Hocking, AUT University

    Darryl Hocking is a senior lecturer in the School of Languages and Social Sciences at AUT University, New Zealand. His research interests involve academic literacies and the analysis of the communicative practices in art and design settings.

References

Amabile, T. M. (1996) Creativity in Context. New York: Springer-Verlag.

Baker, P. (2006) Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis. London: Continuum.

Banaji, S. and Burn, A. (2007) Creativity through a rhetorical lens: Implications for schooling, literacy and media education. Literacy 41 (2): 62–70.

Boden, M. A. (2004) The Creative Mind: Myths and Mechanisms (2nd edn). London: Routledge.

Bourdieu, P. (1984) Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Candlin, C. N. (1997) General editor’s preface. In B. Gunnarsson, P. Linell and B. Nordberg (eds) The Construction of Professional Discourse, viii–xiv. Harlow: Addison Wesley Longman.

Candlin, C. N. (2006) Accounting for interdiscursivity: Challenges to professional expertise. In M. Gotti and D. S. Giannoni (eds) New Trends in Specialized Discourse, 21–45. Bern: Peter Lang

Candlin, C. N. and Crichton, J. (2011) Discourses of Deficit. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillian.

Cicourel, A. V. (2007) A personal, retrospective view of ecological validity. Text & Talk 27 (5/6): 735–752.

Crichton, J. (2003) Issues of Interdiscursivity in the Commercialisation of Professional Practice: The Case of English Language Teaching. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, Macquarie University, Sydney.

Crichton, J. (2010) The Discourse of Commercialisation. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillian. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230295230

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1999) Implications of a systems perspective for the study of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (ed.) Handbook of Creativity, 313–335. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.

Dineen, R., Samuel, E. and Livesey, K. (2005) The promotion of creativity in learners: Theory and practice. Art, Design and Communication in Higher Education 4 (3): 155–172.

Fairclough, N. (1989) Language and Power. London: Longman.

Fairclough, N. (1992) Discourse and Social change. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Freedman, K. (2010) Rethinking creativity. Art Education 63 (2): 8–15.

Glück, J., Ernst, R. and Unger, F. (2002) How creatives define creativity: Definitions reflect different types of creativity. Creativity Research Journal 14 (1): 55–67.

Halliday, M. A. K. and Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2004) An Introduction to Functional Grammar (3rd edn). London: Arnold.

Jeanes, E. L. (2006) ‘Resisting creativity, creating the new’: A Deleuzian perspective on creativity. Creativity and Innovation Management 15 (2): 127–134.

Johnson, R. B. and Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004).Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher 33 (7): 14–26.

Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1988) Freedom and constraint in creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (ed.) The Nature of Creativity: Contemporary Psychological Perspectives, 202–219. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kleiman. (2008) Towards transformation: Conceptions of creativity in higher education. Innovations in Education and Teaching International 45 (3): 209–217.

Krauss, R. (1985) The Originality of the Avant-garde and Other Modernist Myths. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Layder, D. (1993) New Strategies in Social Research. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Linell, P. (1998) Approaching Dialogue: Talk, Interaction and Contexts in Dialogical Perspectives. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: J. Benjamins.

Lubart, T. (1999) Creativity across cultures. In R. J. Sternberg (ed.) Handbook of Creativity, 339–350. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Macherey, P. (1966) A Theory of Literary Production. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Marshall, P. D. (1997) Celebrity and Power: Fame in Contemporary Culture. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Mayer, R. E. (1999) Fifty years of creativity research. In R. J. Sternberg (ed.), Handbook of Creativity, 449–460. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Molesworth, H. (2003) Work ethic. In H. Molesworth (ed.) Work Ethic, 25–51. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.

Pope, R. (2005) Creativity: Theory, History, Practice. New York: Routledge.

Radclyffe-Thomas, N. (2007) Intercultural chameleons or the Chinese way? Chinese students in Western art and design education. Art, Design and Communication in Higher Education 61: 41–55.

Reid, A. and Solomonides, I. (2007) Design students’ experience of engagement and creativity. Art, Design and Communication in Higher Education 6 (1): 27–39.

Reisigl, M. and Wodak, R. (2009) The discourse-historical approach. In R. Wodak and M. Meyer (eds) Methods for Critical Discourse Analysis, 87–121. London: Sage.

Rosenberg, H. (1983) Art on the Edge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Runco, M. A. and Sakamoto, S. O. (1999) Experimental studies of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (ed.) Handbook of Creativity, 62–92. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sarangi, S. and Candlin, C. N. (2001) Motivational relevancies: Some methodological reflections on social theoretical and sociolinguistic practice. In N. Coupland, S. Sarangi and C. N. Candlin (eds) Sociolinguistics and Social Theory, 350–387. Harlow: Longman.

Schlesinger, P. (2007) Creativity: from discourse to doctrine? Screen 48 (3): 377–387.

Simmons, R. and Thompson, R. (2008) Creativity and performativity: The case of further education. British Educational Research Journal 34 (5): 601–618.

Simonton, D. K. (1999) Origins of genius: Darwinian Perspectives on Creativity. New York: Oxford University Press.

Simonton, D. K. (2007) The creative process in Picasso’s Guernica sketches: Monotonic improvements versus nonmonotonic variants. Creativity Research Journal 19 (4): 329– 344.

Smart, G. (1998) Mapping conceptual worlds: using interpretive ethnography to explore knowledge-making in a professional community. The Journal of Business Communication 35 (1): 111–127.

Steers, J. (2009) Creativity: Delusions, realities, opportunities and challenges. Journal of Art and Design Education 28 (2): 126–138.

Steinberg, L. (1972) Other Criteria: Confrontations with Twentieth-century Art. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Sternberg, R. J. (1999) Handbook of Creativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Stokes, P. (2006) Creativity from Constraints: The Psychology of Breakthrough. New York: Springer.

Ward, T. B., Smith, S. M. and Finke, R. A. (1999) Creative cognition. In R. J. Sternberg (ed.) Handbook of Creativity, 189–212. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Zimmerman, E. (2010) Creativity and art education: a personal journey in four acts. Art Education 63 (5): 84–91.

Published

2019-10-17

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Hocking, D. (2019). The discursive construction of creativity as work in a tertiary art and design environment. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice, 7(2), 235-255. https://doi.org/10.1558/japl.v7i2.235