The interpretation of conflict and negotiation in post-paper presentation discussions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/japl.v5i1.81Keywords:
conference paper discussion, question-answer session, medical research, functional, non-native speakersAbstract
In analysing dialogue, a major difficulty is the interpretation of the underlying motivations of participants, particularly in public discourse, where people are often wary of taking a stance on potentially controversial issues. Since clues to understanding are provided by the context, this study included a whole speech event in the analysis – a complete two-hour session of conference presentations recorded and transcribed by the authors, as a first step towards solving this problem. The transcription was based on a model developed by Eggins and Slade (1997) for analysing conversation, a systematic model for the analysis and interpretation of social relations in talk. We aimed to investigate if this model could be applied to an analysis of the discourse structure of the more institutional discourse of the conference discussion, in particular to characterize negative and positive comments following the presentations in our data. We extended the analytical framework to adapt it to this different genre. However, the method proved useful in coding moves in the discourse structure of the interaction, revealing the importance of features such as power status and the tension between conflict and negotiation. Analysis of the whole event facilitates the interpretation of otherwise obscure utterances by providing evidence of cohesive links often spanning several turns, thus laying bare unresolved conflicts and undercurrents of the interaction. This genre needs investigating because the discussion presents particular difficulties especially for non-native speakers of English.
References
Eggins, S. and Slade, D. (1997). Analysing Casual Conversation. London: Cassell. (Reprinted 2006 by Equinox Publishing Ltd.)
Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An Introduction to Functional Grammar (2nd edn). London: Arnold.
Heritage, J. C. and Roth, A. L. (1995). Grammar and institution: Questions and questioning in the broadcast news interview. Research on Language and Social Interaction 28 (1): 1–60. doi:10.1207/s15327973rlsi2801_1
Labov, W. and Fanshel, D. (1977). Therapeutic Discourse. Psychotherapy as Conversation. New York: Academic Press.
Levinson, S. C. (1992). Activity types and language. In P. Drew and J. Heritage (eds) Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings 66–100. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Martin, J. R. (1992). English Text: System and Structure. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Martin, J. R. (1997). Analysing genre: functional parameters. In F. Christie and J. F. Martin (eds) Genre and Institutions: Social Processes in the Workplace and School 3–39. London: Cassell.
Martin, J. R. (2000). Beyond exchange: APPRAISAL systems in English. In S. Hunston and G. Thompson (eds) Evaluation in Text 142–175. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. and Jefferson, G. (1974). A Simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking in conversation. Language 50 (4): 696–735. doi:10.2307/412243
Salager-Meyer, F. (1998). Le discours aigre-doux de la controverse scientifique: évolution de la rhétorique des confrontations académiques. Asp 19 (22): 29–50.
Schegloff, E. (1984). On some questions and ambiguities in conversation. In J. M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds) Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis 28–52. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schiffrin, D. (1987). Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Shalom, C. (1993). Established and evolving spoken research genres: Plenary lecture and poster session discussions at academic conferences. English for Specific Purposes 12 (1): 37–50. doi:10.1016/0889-4906(93)90026-K
Shalom, C. (1995). The discourse management role of the chair in academic conference presentation sessions. INTERFACE. Journal of Applied Linguistics 10 (1): 47–62.
Sinclair, J. and Coulthard, R. (1975). Towards an Analysis of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stubbs, M. (1983). Discourse Analysis: the Sociolinguistic Analysis of Natural Language. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Swales, J. (1990). Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Thompson, S. (2002). As the story unfolds: The use of narrative in research presentations. In E. Ventola, C. Shalom and S. Thompson (eds) The Language of Conferencing 147–168. Bern: Peter Lang.
Ventola, E. (1987). The Structure of Social Interaction. London: Pinter.
Ventola, E. (1993). ‘Any Questions?’ – Discourse features of discussion time. Paper delivered at the 10th World Congress of AILA, Amsterdam, Holland, 8-14.8.1993.
Ventola, E. (1996). Discussing Discussions. Paper presented at the International Conference of Pragmatics Association, Universidad Autónoma Nacional de México, México, 4-9.7.1996.
Ventola, E. (1999). Semiotic spanning at conferences: cohesion and coherence in and across conference papers and their discussions. In W. Bublitz, U. Lenk and. E. Ventola (eds) Coherence in Spoken and Written Discourse: How to Create it and How to Describe it 101–123. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Ventola, E. (2002). Why and what kind of focus on conference presentations? In E. Ventola, C. Shalom and S. Thompson (eds) The Language of Conferencing 15–50. Bern: Peter Lang.
Warren, M. (2006). Features of Naturalness in Conversation. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Webber, P. (1997). From argument to argumentation: interaction in the conference hall. AsP GERAS 15 (18): 439–450.
Webber, P. (2002). The paper is now open for discussion. In E. Ventola, C. Shalom and S. Thompson (eds) The Language of Conferencing 227–254. Bern: Peter Lang.
Webber, P. (2005). Interactive features in medical conference monologue. English for Specific Purposes 24 (2): 157–181. doi:10.1016/j.esp.2004.02.003
White, P. R. R. (2000). Dialogue and intersubjectivity: reinterpreting the semantics of modality and hedging. In M. Coulthard, J. Cotterill and F. Rock (eds) Working with dialog 67–80. Tubingen: Niemeyer.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Equinox Publishing Ltd.
