Nonformal institutional interaction in a conversation club
Conversation partners’ questions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/japl.v5i3.275Keywords:
conversation analysis, nonformal institutional interaction, conversation club, serial-questioning, pivotingAbstract
The data analyzed in this paper come from audio-recorded interaction among first and second language speakers of English at a conversation club sponsored by an English language school. As the analysis shows, the interaction in the conversation club can be understood as a type of non-formal institutional interaction. The analysis focuses on the questions asked by the first language speakers, or conversation partners. In particular, it focuses on the questioning styles of serial-questioning and pivoting. In addition, the conversation partners tend to assume a discourse identity as primary participant within the participation framework, a discourse identity that they work to maintain and, when necessary, re-establish. As non-formal institutional interaction, it does not involve turn pre-allocation or restrictions on the type of turn that participants may take. It is, though, oriented toward the fulfilment of institutionally relevant goals.
References
Atkinson, J. M. and Drew, P. (1979) Order in Court: The Organisation of Verbal Interaction in Judicial Settings. London: Macmillan.
Butler, C. W. (2008) Talk and Social Interaction in the Playground. Surrey: Ashgate.
Clayman, S. and Heritage, J. (2002) The News Interview: Journalists and Public Figures on the Air. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613623
Drew, P. (1992) Contested evidence in courtroom cross-examination: The case of a trial for rape. In P. Drew and J. Heritage (eds) Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings, 470–520. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Drew, P. and Heritage, J. (1992) Analyzing talk at work: An introduction. In P. Drew and J. Heritage (eds) Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings, 3–65. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Erickson, F. (2004) Talk and Social Theory. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Glenn, P. (2003) Laughter in Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511519888
Goffman, E. (1981) Forms of Talk. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Halliday, M. A. K. and Hasan, R. (1976) Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
Heritage, J. (1984) A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In J. M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds) Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, 299–345. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Heritage, J. (1998) Oh-prefaced responses to inquiry. Language in Society 27: 291–334. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0047404598003017
Heritage, J. and Clayman, S. (2010) Talk in Action: Interactions, Identities, and Institutions. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.
Heritage, J. and Greatbatch, D. (1991) On the institutional character of institutional talk: The case of news interviews. In D. Boden and D. H. Zimmerman (eds) Talk and Social Structure: Studies in Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis, 93–137. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Hutchby, I. (1996) Confrontation Talk: Arguments, Asymmetries, and Power on Talk Radio. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hutchby, I. (2007) The Discourse of Child Counselling. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Jefferson, G. (1981) The abominable Ne?: An exploration of post-response pursuit of response. In Jahrbuch 1980 des Instituts für Deutsche Sprache, 53–88. Düsseldorf: Pädagogischer Verlag Schwann.
Jefferson, G. (1987) On exposed and embedded correction in conversation. In G. Button and J. R. E. Lee (eds) Talk and Social Organization, 86–100. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Jefferson, G. (2004) Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. H. Lerner (ed.) Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, 13–31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Kasper, G. (2004) Participant orientations in conversation-for-learning. Modern Language Journal 88 (4): 551–567. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0026-7902.2004.t01-18-.x
Kurhila, S. (2001) Correction in talk between native and non-native speakers. Journal of Pragmatics 33 (6): 1083–1110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(00)00048-5
Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991) Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lerner, G. H. (2003) Selecting next speaker: The context-sensitive operation of a contextfree organization. Language in Society 32 (2): 177–201. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S004740450332202X
McHoul, A. (1978) The organization of turns at formal talk in the classroom. Language in Society 7 (2): 183–213. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500005522
Mehan, H. (1979) Learning Lessons: Social Organization in the Classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Mori, J. (2003) The construction of interculturality: A study of initial encounters between Japanese and American students. Research on Language and Social Interaction 36 (2): 143–184. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327973RLSI3602_3
Pomerantz, A. (1988) Offering a candidate answer: An information seeking strategy. Communication Monographs 55: 360–373. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03637758809376177
Rampton, B. (2006) Language in Late Modernity: Interaction in an Urban School. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486722
Sacks, H. (1995) Lectures on Conversation, Volumes I and II. Oxford: Blackwell.
Schegloff, E. A. (1979) The relevance of repair to syntax-for-conversation. In T. Givon (ed) Syntax and Semantics 12: Discourse and Syntax, 261–286. New York: Academic Press.
Schegloff, E. A. (1984) On some questions and ambiguities in conversation. In J. M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds) Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, 28–52. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schegloff, E. A. and Sacks, H. (1973) Opening up closings. Semiotica 8 (2): 289–327. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289
Scheutz, H. (2005) Pivot constructions in spoken German. In A. Hakulinen and M. Selting (eds) Syntax and Lexis in Conversation: Studies on the Use of Linguistic Resources in Talkin-Interaction, 103–128. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Tanaka, H. (2001) The implementation of possible cognitive shifts in Japanese conversation: Complementizers as pivotal devices. In M. Selting and E. Couper-Kuhlen (eds) Studies in Interactional Linguistics, 81–109. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Zimmerman, D. H. (1992) The interactional organization of calls for emergency assistance. In P. Drew and J. Heritage (eds) Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings, 418–469. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zimmerman, D. H. (1998) Identity, context and interaction. In C. Antaki and S. Widdicombe (eds) Identities in Talk, 87–106. London: Sage Publications
Published
Issue
Section
License
Equinox Publishing Ltd.