Journal of Contemporary Archaeology, Vol 2, No 2 (2015)

Bastard Design Practices: An Archaeological Perspective

James Dyer
Issued Date: 12 Jan 2016

Abstract


Design is a bastard practice, it is fundamentally detached from its own inherited ethos so as to appear progressive, virtuous and fashionable. Such abstinence from knowledge and past experience models a practice that advocates competition over communion – a renunciation of experience and sanction of illusory solutionism. The design discipline would benefit greatly from the principle ideologies of archeology, a practice which uncovers the past to inform the present and shape the future. It is proposed here that a practice of Design Archeology be installed into fundamental design practices to create responsibility in the agency of design. Are we all archaeologists? not quite yet.

Download Media

PDF

DOI: 10.1558/jca.v2i2.28183

References


Alloway, L. 1990. The Independent Group: Postwar Britain and the Aesthetics of Plenty. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.


Foucault, M. 1972. The Archaeology of Knowledge. Translated by A.M. Sheridan Smith. New York: Pantheon Books.


Huhtamo, E., ed. 2011. Media Archaeology: Approaches, Applications, and Implications. Berkeley: University of California Press.


Parikka, J. 2013. What is Media Archaeology? Cambridge: Polity.


Massey, A. 2015. The Independent Group. Online: http://independentgroup.org.uk/


Simon, H. A. 1969. The Sciences of the Artificial. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.


Tomes, A. and P. Armstrong. 2010. “Dialectics of Design: How Ideas of ‘Good Design’ Change.” Prometheus 28(1): 29–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08109021003694154


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.





Equinox Publishing Ltd - 415 The Workstation 15 Paternoster Row, Sheffield, S1 2BX United Kingdom
Telephone: +44 (0)114 221-0285 - Email: info@equinoxpub.com

Privacy Policy