Journal of Contemporary Archaeology, Vol 2, No 2 (2015)

On the Ontology of Archaeology

Lawrence E. Moore
Issued Date: 12 Jan 2016

Abstract


Being an archaeologist requires social legitimization and acceptance within a community of archaeological practice. The term “archaeologist” is unsettled at an abstract level but is well defined in local contexts. A sociological definition is offered for "archaeologist" that is based upon a philosophical understanding of "archaeology." Archaeology has qualities that make it special and only those willing to advance through accepted legitimating processes achieve the title "archaeologist." Thus, not everyone should be an archaeologist.

Download Media

PDF

DOI: 10.1558/jca.v2i2.28313

References


Flannery, K. V. 1982. “The Golden Marshalltown: A Parable for the Archeology of the 1980s.” American Anthropologist 84(2): 265–278. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/aa.1982.84.2.02a00010


Lave, J. and E. Wenger. 1991. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355


Varenne, H. 1977. Americans Together: Structured Diversity in a Midwestern Town. New York: Teachers College Press.


Wenger, E. 1998. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803932


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.





Equinox Publishing Ltd - 415 The Workstation 15 Paternoster Row, Sheffield, S1 2BX United Kingdom
Telephone: +44 (0)114 221-0285 - Email: info@equinoxpub.com

Privacy Policy