Journal for the Cognitive Science of Religion, Vol 3, No 1 (2015)

Missing the Boat: CSR Needs Empirically Literate Philosophers

C. R. Blease
Issued Date: 25 Apr 2016

Download Media

PDF (Price: £17.50 )

DOI: 10.1558/jcsr.v3i1.29551

References


Bechtel, W. 1985. “Realism, Instrumentalism, and the Intentional Stance.” Cognitive Science 9: 473–497. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0904_5


Dennett, D. 1981. “True Believers: The Intentional Strategy and Why It Works.” In Scientific Explanation, edited by A. F. Heath, 150–167. Oxford: Clarendon Press.


Dennett, D. 1987. The Intentional Stance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.


McCauley, R. N. 1996. “Explanatory Pluralism and the Co-Evolution of Theories.” In The Churchlands and Their Critics, edited by R. N. McCauley, 17–47. Oxford: Blackwell.


McCauley, R. N. 2013. “Explanatory Pluralism and the Cognitive Science of Religion: Or Why Scholars in Religious Studies Should Stop Worrying about Reductionism.” In Mental Culture: Classical Social Theory and the Cognitive Science of Religion, edited by D. Xygalatas and W. W. McCorkle, Jr., 11–32. London: Acumen.


Neurath, O. 1932/33. “Protokollsatze.” Erkenntnis 3: 204–221. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01886420


Quine, W. V. O. 1995. From Stimulus to Science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.





Equinox Publishing Ltd - 415 The Workstation 15 Paternoster Row, Sheffield, S1 2BX United Kingdom
Telephone: +44 (0)114 221-0285 - Email: info@equinoxpub.com

Privacy Policy