Exploring interaction between a non-speaking boy using aided AAC and his everyday communication partners

features of turn organizing and turn design

Authors

  • Maja Sigurd Pilesjo University of Southern Denmark
  • Gitte Rasmussen University of Southern Denmark

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/jircd.v2i2.183

Keywords:

Aided interaction, Conversation Analysis, Augmentative and Alternative Communication, turn-at-action, turntaking, disability

Abstract

This study investigates the practice of achieving common understanding in aided Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC). The aims are to explore whether communicative contributions can be described as turns, as defined in conversation analytic terms, and how then the contributions to the interaction can be designed. The principles and practices of Conversation Analysis (CA) were used to record, transcribe and analyse conversations between a non-speaking boy with cerebral palsy with, on different occasions, his mother, his assistant and his friend. The boy augments his communication with aided AAC, bliss symbolics. The analysis indicates that the participants can collaborately create and orient to units in interaction equivalent to turns in interaction although they differ dramatically from ordinary turns-at-talk. In order to capture the nature of the described units, the category turn-at-action is suggested. The analyses demonstrate that the boy’s turn-at-actions are oriented to as a co-constructed and thus interactionally achieved unit: the boy points at a bliss symbol which is given voice by the speaking co-participant. In and through the relevant made voicing of the turn-at-action, a turn constructional unit (TCU) emerges, and the turn-at-action is designed and oriented to as a TCU-based unit. The analysis will also show that turns can be designed as non TCU-based units. These findings may have implications for CA theory as well as for clinical intervention.

Author Biographies

  • Maja Sigurd Pilesjo, University of Southern Denmark

    Maja Sigurd Pilesjo is a Speech and Language Therapist with 25 years of clinical practice in the field of AAC. At present, she is a Ph.D-student at the Institute of Language and Communication, University of Southern Denmark.

  • Gitte Rasmussen, University of Southern Denmark

    Gitte Rasmussen (Ph.D) is employed as an associate professor at the Institute of Language and Communication, University of Southern Denmark. She is director of the research Center for Social Practices and Cognition (SoPraCon). Her research interests are Ethnometodological and Conversation Analytic studies of everyday life of ordinary ((dis)abled) people, Interaction and Cognition, Institutional Interaction. Recent publication: Rasmussen, G. (2010). "'Going mental' - the risks of assessment activities (in teenage talk)." Discourse Studies 12(6): 739-761

References

Abrahamsson, L. and Ljung, I-K. (2008). Bliss i interaktion ? En samtalsanalytisk fallstudi av hur blissanvandare och tolkare tillsammans bygger upp yttranden. Unpublished Master Thesis, Uppsala University, Uppsala. In Swedish.

Blackstone, S., Williams, M. and Wilkins, D. (2007). Key principles underlying research and practice in AAC. AAC- Augmentative and Alternative Communication 23 (3): 191?203. doi:10.1080/07434610701553684

Blau, A. (1986). Communication in the Back Channel: Social Structural Analyses of Nonspeech/Speech Conversations. Doctoral thesis. New York: City University of New York.

Bloch, S. (2005). Co-constructing meaning in Acquired Speech Disorders: Word and letter repetition in the construction of turns. In K. Richards and P. Seedhouse (eds), Applying Conversation Analysis. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Bloch, S. (2011). Anticipatory other-completion of augmentative and alternative communication talk: A conversation analysis study. Disability and Rehabilitation 33 (3): 229?242. doi:10.3109/09638288.2010.491574

Bloch, S. and Beeke, S. (2008). Co-constructed talk in the conversations of people with dysarthria and aphasia. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics 22 (12): 974?990. doi: 10.1080/02699200802394831

Bloch, S. and Wilkinson, R. (2004). The understandability of AAC: A conversation analysis study of acquired dysarthria. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 20 (4): 272?282. doi:10.1080/07434610400005614

Brekke, K. M. and von Tetzchner, S. (2003). Co-construction in graphic language development. In S. von Tetzchner and N. Grove (eds), Augmentative and Alternative Communication Developmental Issues, 211?228. London and Philadelphia, PA: Whurr Publishers.

Buzolich, M., J. and Wieman, J. (1988). Turn taking in atypical conversations: The case of the speaker/augmented-communicator dyad. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 31: 3?18.

Clarke, M. (2005). Conversational Interaction Between Children Using Communication Aids and their Peers. Doctoral thesis. London: University College London, Department of Developmental Science.

Clarke, M. and Wilkinson, R. (2007). Interaction between children with cerebral palsy and their peers 1: Organizing and understanding VOCA use. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 23 (4): 336?348. doi:10.1080/07434610701390350

Clarke, M. and Wilkinson, R. (2008). Interaction between children with cerebral palsy and their peers 2: Understanding initiated VOCA-mediated turns. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 24 (1): 3?15. doi:10.1080/07434610701390400

Collins, S. (1996). Referring expressions in conversations between aided and natural speakers. In S von Tetzchner and M. Hygum Jensen (eds) Augmentative and Alternative Communication. European Perspectives, 89?100. London: Whurr Publishers.

Dahlgren Sandberg, A. and Liliedahl, M. (2008). Patterns in early interaction between young preschool children with severe speech and physical impairments and their parents. Child Language Teaching and Therapy 24 (1): 9?30. doi:10.1177/0265659007084566

Duncan, S. and Fiske, D. (1977). Face-to-face Interaction: Research, Methods, and Theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum Associates.

Ford, C. and Thompson, S. (1996). Interactional units in conversation: Syntactic, intonational, and pragmatic resources for the management of turns. In E. Ochs, E. Schegloff and S. Thompson (eds) Interaction and Grammar, 134?184. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Goffman, E. (1979). Footing. Semiotica 25: 1?29. doi:10.1515/semi.1979.25.1-2.1

Goode, D. (1994). A World Without Words. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

Goodwin, C. (1981). Conversational Organization. Interaction Between Speakers and Hearers. New York: Academic Press.

Goodwin, C., Goodwin, M. and Olsher, D. (2002). Producing sense with nonsense syllables: Turn and sequence in conversations with a man with severe aphasia. In C. Ford, B. Fox and S. Thompson (eds) The Language of Turn and Sequence, 56?80. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Goodwin, C. (2003). Conversational frameworks for the accomplishment of meaning in aphasia. In C. Goodwin (ed) Conversation and Brain Damage, 90?116. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Harris, D. (1982). Communication interaction processes involving non-vocal physically handicapped children. Topics in Language Disorder 2: 22?37. doi:10.1097/00011363-198203000-00005

Hellquist, B. (1982). SIT. Sprakligt Impressivt test. Skivarp, Sweden: Pedagogisk Design.

Heister Trygg, B., Andersson, I., Hardenstedt, L. and Sigurd Pilesjo, M. (1998). Alternativ och kompletterande kommunikation (AKK) i teori och praktik. Stockholm: Handikappinstitutet. In Swedish.

Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Oxford: Polity Press.

Higginbotham, D. J., Mathy-Laikko, P. and Yoder, D. (1988). Studying conversations of augmentative communication system users. In L. Bernstein (ed.) The Vocally Impaired: Clinical Practice and Research, 265?294. Philadelphia, PA: Grune & Stratton.

Higginbotham, D. J., and Wilkins, D. P. (1999). Slipping through the timestream: Social issues of time and timing in augmented interactions. In D. Korvasky, J. F. Duchan and M. Maxwell (eds) Constructing (In)competence: Disabling Evaluations in Clinical and Social Interaction, 49?82. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Hutchby I. and Wooffitt, R. (2008). Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Kraat, A. W. (1985). Communication Interaction between Aided and Natural Speakers. A State of the Art Report. Toronto: Canadian Rehabilitation Council for the Disabled.

Larsson, I. and Thoren-Jonsson, A.-L. (2007). The Swedish Interpretation Service: An exploratory study of a new communication support provided to people with aphasia. AAC- Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23 (4): 312?322. doi:10.1080/07434610601180026

Lerner, G. (1996). On the ?semi-permeable’ character of grammatical units in conversation: Conditional entry into the turn space of another speaker. In E. Ochs, E. Schegloff and S. Thompson (eds) Interaction and Grammar, 238?276. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Light, J. (1988). Interaction involving individuals using augmentative and alternative communication systems. State of the arts and future directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 4 (2): 66?82. doi:10.1080/07434618812331274657

Light, J., Collier, B. and Parnes, P. (1985a). Communicative interaction between young non-speaking physically disabled children and their primary caregivers: Part I ? discourse patterns. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1 (2): 74?83. doi:10.1080/07434618512331273561

Light, J., Collier, B. and Parnes, P. (1985b). Communicative interaction between young nonspeaking physically disabled children and their primary caregivers: Part III ? modes of communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1 (4): 125?133. doi: 10.1080/07434618512331273621

Lind, M. ( 2001). Conversational Co-operation. University of Oslo, Oslo.

McNaughton, S. (1985). Communicating with Blissymbolics. Toronto: Blissymbolics Communication Institute.

Muller, E. s., G. (2000). Capturing the Complexity of Aided Interactions: A Conversation Analysis Perspective. Paper presented at the Research Symposia Proceedings ? International Society for Augmentative and Alternative Communication, Washington DC.

Muller, E. and Soto, G. (2002). Conversation patterns of three adults using aided speech: Variations across partners. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 18 (2): 77?89. doi:10.1080/07434610212331281181

Ochs, E., Schegloff, E. and Thompson, S. (1996). Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511620874

Perkins, M. (2007). Pragmatic Impairment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511486555

Rapley, M. (2004). The Social Construction of Intellectual Disability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511489884

Rasmussen, G. (2010). ‘Going mental’ ? The risks of assessment activities (in teenage talk). Discourse Studies 12 (6): 739?761. doi:10.1177/1461445610381863

Robillard, A. B. (1999). Meaning of a Disability: The Lived Experience of Paralysis. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. and Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turntaking for conversation. Language 50 (4): 696?735. doi:10.2307/412243

Schegloff, E. (1982). Discourse as an interactional achievement: Some uses of ?uh huh’ and other things that come between sentences. In D. Tannen (ed.) Analyzing Discourse: Text and Talk, 71?93. Georgetown, TX: Georgetown University Press.

Schegloff, E. A. (1996). Turn organization: One intersection of grammar and interaction. In E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff and S. Thompson (eds) Interaction and Grammar, 52?133. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Schegloff, E. (1998). Body torque. Social Research 65 (3): 535?596.

Schegloff, E. (2007). Sequence Organization in Interaction. A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511791208

Sigurd Pilesjo, M. (forthcoming). Exploring interaction between a non-speaking boy using aided augmentative and alternative communication and his every-day communication partners: Non-spoken resources as turn constructional methods in turn transition. In N. Noren, C. Samuelsson and C. Plejert (eds) Aided Communication in Dialogical Perspectives. Augmentative and Alternative Communication as Action and Participation within Embodied Social Worlds. Guildford, Surrey: J&R Press Ltd.

Steensig, J. (2001). Sprog i virkeligheden. Bidrag til en interaktionel lingvistik. Aarhus: Aarhus Universitetsforlag.

von Tetzchner, S., Grove, N., Loncke, F., Barnett, S., Woll, B. and Clibbens, J. (1996). Preliminaries to a comprehensive model of augmentative and alternative communication. In S. H. J. von Tetzchner, M. (ed.) Augmentative and Alternative Communication: European Perspectives, 19?36. London: Whurr.

von Tetchner, S. and Hygum Jensen, M. (1996). Augmentative and Alternative Communication. European Perspectives. London: Whurr.

Wechsler, D. (2005). Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence – Third edition. WPSSI-III Manual. Stockholm: Psykologiforlaget AB.

Published

2011-08-29

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Pilesjo, M. S., & Rasmussen, G. (2011). Exploring interaction between a non-speaking boy using aided AAC and his everyday communication partners: features of turn organizing and turn design. Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders, 2(2), 183-213. https://doi.org/10.1558/jircd.v2i2.183