Functions of sequential placement

Conversational co-construction of a single nonverbal contribution

Authors

  • Tobias A. Kroll Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center
  • Ben Rutter University of Sheffield
  • Judith D. Oxley University of Louisiana at Lafayette

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/jircd.32014

Keywords:

Communication impairment, Conversation Analysis, Interpersonal communication, Sequential placement

Abstract

This study examines how a nearly nonverbal, prelingually deaf young man and his speech-language clinician co-construct a conversation using the client’s nonconventional contributions. It is shown how conversation is made possible through variations in the sequential placement of a single contribution by the client, a nasal sound construed as serving four distinct conversational functions: as a continuer; as a token of turn-constructional and topical completion; as an incomprehension token and signal for lack of verbal resources; and as a comprehension token. These functions are based on variations the sequential placement of the nasal and the differential treatment it receives by the interlocutors as a consequence. Results indicate that unconventional conversational contributions may be untypical in their form but typical in their function; that they may have subtly different functions when compared to their conventional cognates; or that they may have functions not found in typical talk.

Author Biographies

  • Tobias A. Kroll, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center

    Tobias A. Kroll, Ph.D., CF-SLP is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences at the Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center in Lubbock, TX, USA. He received his MA in Linguistics from the University of Münster, Germany, and his Ph.D. in Applied Language and Speech Sciences from the University of Louisiana at Lafayette, USA. His research focuses on the fine-grained analysis of interpersonal interaction and on eye movements in reading. To this end, Dr Kroll uses experimental as well as qualitative methodologies including eye movement measurements, Conversation Analysis, ethnography, and various analytical tools from linguistics. He has published conversation-analytic studies of therapeutic interaction as well as survey research on the perception of dialects, and he has contributed to The Handbook of Qualitative Research in Communication Disorders as well as to The SAGE Encyclopedia of Human Communication Sciences and Disorders. Dr Kroll teaches Language Development, Interpersonal Communication, and Multicultural Issues in Communication Disorders at the undergraduate level, and various classes in linguistics and anthropology at the doctoral level. He is a member of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA), the International Literacy Association (ILA), the Southeastern Conference on Linguistics (SECOL), and Phi Kappa Phi.

  • Ben Rutter, University of Sheffield

    Ben Rutter, Ph.D. is a lecturer in clinical linguistics in the Department of Human Communication Sciences at the University of Sheffield, UK. He previously held the position of Assistant Professor in the Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders at the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center (2010–2012). He holds a BA in English Language and Linguistics from the University of York (UK) and a Ph.D. in Clinical Linguistics from the University of Louisiana at Lafayette. His research interests include the role of linguistics and phonetics in speech-language pathology, qualitative research methods, and the motor speech disorders. His doctoral research, supervised by Martin J. Ball and Nicole Müller, focused on self-repair in dysarthria secondary to multiple sclerosis. He has published research in the areas of dysarthria, child language development, and interactional phonetics. In particular, Dr Rutter employs key theoretical and analytical concepts from linguistics and applies them to problems related to speech and language therapy. He teaches phonetics, linguistics and research methods to students of both speech-language therapy and linguistics. He is a member of the International Clinical Phonetics and Linguistics Association (ICPLA), the British Association of Clinical Linguistics (BACL), Sheffield Medical Humanities and the Centre for Assistive Technology and Connected Healthcare (CATCH).

  • Judith D. Oxley, University of Louisiana at Lafayette

    Judith D. Oxley, Ph. D., CCC-SLP is a Speech-Language Pathologist and Assistant Professor at the University of Louisiana at Lafayette. Her current clinical and research interests include language and speech development in children who use augmentative and alternative communication, translation issues arising from multilingual and multicultural research, and the emergence of metastrategic insight into clinical practice in preprofessional speech-language pathology students. She is part of the Becoming an Aided Communicator (BAC) international research project, led by Dr Stephen von Tetzchner of the University of Oslo. Within the project, her focus is on issues related to vocabulary development, and the interaction of modality and context. As part of her interest in multimodal communication, she has been exploring clinical tools and strategies that can be used with a growing population entering the world of AAC, such as people with hearing impairment, including those who have multiple diagnoses.

References

Anzul, M., Evans, J. F., King, R., & Tellier-Robinson, D. (2001). Moving beyond a deficit perspective with qualitative research methods. Exceptional Children, 67, 235-249.

Audacity development team (2015). Audacity®. Retrieved October 16, 2011 from http://audacity.sourceforge.net/.

Ball, M.J., & Müller, N. (2005). Phonetics for communication disorders. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Beeke, S., Wilkinson, R., & Maxim, J. (2009). Prosody as a compensatory strategy in the conversations of people with agrammatism. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 23, 133--155.

Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Clarke, M., Bloch, S., & Wilkinson, R. (2013). Speaker transfer in children’s peer conversation: Completing communication-aid-mediated contributions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 29, 37--53.

Clift, R. (2005). Discovering order. Lingua, 115, 1641--1665.

Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. L. (2008). Basics of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Damico, J. S., Müller, N., & Ball, M. J. (2010). Social and practical considerations in labeling. In J. S. Damico, N. Müller, & M. J. Ball (Eds.), The handbook of speech and language disorders (pp. 11-37). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

Damico, J. S., & Simmons-Mackie, N. N. (2003). Qualitative research and speech-language pathology. A tutorial for the clinical realm. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 12, 131--143.

Damico, J. S., Simmons-Mackie, N., & Wilson, B. T. (2006). The negotiation of intelligibility in an aphasic dyad. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 20, 599--605.

Damico, J. S., Wilson, B. T., Simmons-Mackie, N. N., & Tetnowski, J. A. (2008). Overcoming unintelligibility in aphasia: The impact of non-verbal interactive strategies. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 22, 775--782.

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 1-32). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual. Essays on face-to-face behavior. New York: Pantheon.

Goodwin, C. (1981). Conversational organization. Interaction between speakers and hearers. New York: Academic Press.

Goodwin, C. (1995). Co-constructing meaning in conversations with an aphasic man. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 28, 233--260.

Goodwin, C., & Heritage, J. (1990) Conversation analysis. Annual Review of Anthropology, 19, 283--307.

Grice, H. P. (1975) Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and Semantics. Vol. 3: Speech Acts (pp. 41-58). New York, NY: Academic Press.

Griffin, H. C., Davis, M. L., & Williams, S. C. (2004). CHARGE Syndrome: Educational and technological interventions. RE:view, 35, 149--157.

Janesick, V. L. (1994) The dance of qualitative research design: Metaphor, methodolatry, and meaning. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 209-219). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Jefferson, Gail (1984) Notes on a systematic deployment of the acknowledgement tokens ‘Yeah’ and ‘Mmhm’. Papers in Linguistics, 17, 197-216.

Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Local, J., & Walker, G. (2012). How phonetic features project more talk. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 42, 255--280.

Mahon, M. (2009). Interactions between a deaf child for whom English is an additional language and his specialist teacher in the first year at school: Combining words and gestures. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 23, 611--629.

Philips, B. J., & Ruscello, D. M. (1998). Introduction. In B. J. Philips & D. M. Ruscello (Eds.), Differential diagnosis in Speech-Language Pathology (pp. 1--4). Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann.

Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696--735.

Schegloff, E. A. (1982). Discourse as an interactional achievement: Some uses of ‘uh huh’ and other things that come between sentences. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Analyzing discourse: Text and talk (pp. 71--93). Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.

Schegloff, E. A. (1987). Analyzing single episodes of interaction: An exercise in Conversation Analysis. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50, 101--114.

Schegloff, E. A. (1988). Discourse as an interactional achievement II: An exercise in Conversation Analysis. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Linguistics in context: Connecting observation and understanding (pp. 135-158). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.

Schegloff, E. A. (1989). Harvey Sacks lectures 1964--1965: An introduction/memoir. Human Studies, 12, 185--209.

Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction. A primer in Conversation Analysis. Volume 1. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

Simmons-Mackie, N. N., & Damico, J. S. (2003). Contributions of qualitative research to the knowledge base of normal communication. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 12: 144-154.

Simmons-Mackie, N., Damico, J. S., & Damico, H. L. (1999). A qualitative study of feedback in aphasia treatment. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 8, 218--230.

Stiegler, L. N. (2007). Discovering communicative competencies in a nonspeaking child with autism. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 38, 400--413.

Tarling, K., Perkins, M. R., & Stojanovik, V. (2006). Conversational success in Williams syndrome: Communication in the face of cognitive and linguistic limitations. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 20, 583--590.

Tarplee, C., & Barrow, E. (1999). Delayed echoing as an interactional resource: A case study of a 3-year-old child on the autistic spectrum. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 13, 449--482.

Walker, G. (2012). Coordination and interpretation of vocal and visible resources: ‘Trail-off’ conjunctions. Language and Speech, 55, 141--163.

Published

2017-02-01

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Kroll, T., Rutter, B., & Oxley, J. (2017). Functions of sequential placement: Conversational co-construction of a single nonverbal contribution. Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders, 8(1), 96-120. https://doi.org/10.1558/jircd.32014