On the use of the term ‘repair’ and its application to disordered conversational speech

Authors

  • Ben Rutter University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/jircd.v1i2.199

Keywords:

Speech pathology, conversation analysis, dysarthria

Abstract

Conversational repair is a commonly studied aspect of both normal and disordered human interaction. It has the potential to reveal a great deal about how speakers deal with problems in naturally occurring talk-in-interaction. However, the extent to which repair has been defined, classified, and then compared to such phenomena as repetitions, slips of the tongue, pauses, and fillers has not always been altogether consistent. This paper discusses the use of the term repair in a variety of disciplines and proposes a taxonomy of repair types. It is suggested that this will facilitate the quantification of repair in corpora of disordered conversation, allowing for comparisons of frequency counts across speakers, disorders, and time points.

References

Bloch, S. and Wilkinson, R. (2004). The understandability of AAC: A conversation analysis study of acquired dysarthria. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 20 (4): 272–282. doi:10.1080/07434610400005614

Boersma, Paul and Weenink, David (2010). Praat: doing phonetics by computer (Version 5.1.26) [Computer program]. Retrieved 2 February 2010, from http://www.praat.org/.

Boles, L. (1998). Conversational discourse analysis as a method for evaluating progress in aphasia: a case report. Journal of Communicative Disorders, 31 (3): 261–274. doi:10.1016/S0021-9924(98)00005-7

Couper-Kuhlen, E. and Selting, M. (1996). Prosody and Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511597862

Curl, T. (2004). ‘Repetition’ repairs: The relationship of phonetic structure and sequence organization. In E. Couper-Kuhlen and C. E. Ford (eds) Sound Patterns in Interaction: Cross-linguistic Studies of Phonetics and Prosody for Conversation 273–298. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.

Curl, T. (2005). Practices in other-initiated repair resolution: the phonetic differentiation of ‘repetitions’. Discourse Processes, 39 (1): 1–43. doi:10.1207/s15326950dp3901_1

Ferguson, A. (1994). The influence of aphasia, familiarity and activity on conversational repair. Aphasiology, 8 (2): 143–15. doi:10.1080/02687039408248647

Ferguson, A. (1998). Conversational turn-taking and repair in fluent aphasia. Aphasiology, 12 (11): 1007–1031. doi:10.1080/02687039808249466

Ford, C. E. and Couper-Kuhlen, E. (2004). Conversation and phonetics: Essential connections. In E. Couper-Kuhlen and C. E. Ford (eds) Sound Patterns in Interaction: Crosslinguistic Studies of Phonetics and Prosody for Conversation 377–400. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.

Heeman, P. and Allen, J. F. (1999). Speech repairs, intonational phrases and discourse markers: modelling speakers' utterances in spoken dialog. Computational Linguistics, 25 (4): 527–572.

Hutchby, I. and Wooffitt, R. (1998). Conversation Analysis. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

Jasperson, R. (2002). Some linguistic aspects of closure cut-off. In C. E. Ford, B. A. Fox and S. A. Thompson (eds) The Language of Turn and Sequence 257–286. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Jefferson, G. (1975). Error connection as an interactional resource. Language in Society, 3 (2): 181–199. doi:10.1017/S0047404500004334

Laakso, M. (1997). Oman puheen korjaukset sujuvien afaatikkojen keskustelussa (Selfrepairs in the conversations of fluent aphasics). Virittäjä, 101: 572–574.

Levelt, W. J. M. (1983). Monitoring and self-repair in speech. Cognition, 14 (1): 41–104. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(83)90026-4

Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Oelschlaeger, M. L. and Damico, J. S. (2003). Word searches in aphasia: a case study of the collaborative responses of communicative partners. In C. Goodwin (ed.) Conversation and Brain Damage 211–227. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Perkins, L. (2003). Negotiating repair in aphasic conversation: interactional issues. In C. Goodwin (ed.) Conversation and Brain Damage 147–162. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Sacks, H. (1972). An initial investigation of the usability of conversational data for doing sociology. In D. Sudnow (ed.) Studies in Social Interaction 31–74. New York: Free Press.

Schegloff, E. A. (1968). Sequencing in conversational openings. American Anthropologist, 70 (6): 1075–1095. doi:10.1525/aa.1968.70.6.02a00030

Schegloff, E. A. (1972). Notes on a conversational practice: formulating place. In D. Sudnow (ed.), Studies in Social Interaction 75–119. New York: Free Press.

Schegloff, E. A. (1993). Reflections on quantification in the study of conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 26 (1): 99–128. doi:10.1207/s15327973rlsi2601_5

Schegloff, E. A. (2002). When ‘others’ initiate repair. Applied Linguistics, 21 (2): 205–243. doi:10.1093/applin/21.2.205

Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson. G. and Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organisation of repair in conversation. Language, 53 (2): 361–382. doi:10.2307/413107

Shriberg, E. (1994). Preliminaries to a Theory of Speech Disfluencies. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of California at Berkeley.

Shriberg, E. E. (2001). To ‘errrr’ is human: Ecology and acoustics of speech disfluencies. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 31 (1): 153–169. doi:10.1017/S0025100301001128

Tarplee, C. (1996). Working on young children’s utterances: prosodic aspects of repetition during picture labeling. In E. Couper-Kuhlen, and M. Selting (eds) Prosody and Conversation 406–435. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Published

2011-01-25

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Rutter, B. (2011). On the use of the term ‘repair’ and its application to disordered conversational speech. Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders, 1(2), 199-216. https://doi.org/10.1558/jircd.v1i2.199