Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders, Vol 3, No 2 (2012)

The organization of repair in SSLD classroom discourse: how to expose the trouble-source

Julie Radford, Judy Ireson, Merle Mahon
Issued Date: 31 Dec 2012

Abstract


As children with specific speech and language difficulties (SSLD) have problems processing language, they are vulnerable in the classroom since it is primarily an oral environment. Repairs offer a potentially useful source of information for the language learner but, to benefit from feedback about their errors or misunderstandings, children must notice the corrective potential in the stream of educational discourse. Repair practices (245) with children with SSLD were analysed quantitatively in terms of age and type of activity. They were also analysed sequentially, using conversation analysis. Repairs dealing with form (grammatical and phonological) were not immediately taken up by the children whereas those concerning meaning (lexical and content) mostly led to self-correction. One explanation is that, during form repair, the adults’ corrective moves are embedded in turns that perform multiple work, so that children attend primarily to meaning. Designs that may be better suited to exposing corrections are discussed, with particular reference to features of prosody.

Download Media

PDF (Price: £17.50 )

DOI: 10.1558/jircd.v3i2.171

References


Couper-Khulen, E. (1996). The prosody of repetition: On quoting and mimicry. In E. Couper-Khulen and M. Selting (eds) Prosody in Conversation, 366–405). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
DCSF (2008). The Bercow Report: A Review of Services for Children and Young People (0–19) with Speech, Language and Communication Needs. Nottingham: DCSF Publications.
Fey, M. and Proctor-Williams, K. (2000). Recasting, elicited imitation and modelling in grammar intervention for children with specific language impairments. In D. V. M. Bishop and L. Leonard (eds) Speech and Language Impairments in Children: Causes, Characteristics, Intervention and Outcome, 177–194. Hove: Psychology Press.
Have, P. ten (1999). Doing Conversation Analysis: A Practical Guide. London: Sage.
Jefferson, G. (1987). On exposed and embedded correction in conversation. In G. Button and J. Lee (eds) Talk and Social Organization, 86–100. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Local, J. (1992). Continuing and restarting. In P. Auer and A. di Luzio (eds) The Contextualisation of Language, 272–296. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
McCartney, E., Boyle, J., Ellis, S., Bannatyne, S. and Turnbull, M. (2011). Indirect therapy for children with persistent language impairment in mainstream schools: outcomes from a cohort intervention. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 46 (1): 74–82.
McHoul, A. (1990). The organization of repair in classroom talk. Language in Society 19: 349–377. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S004740450001455X
Montgomery, J. (2008). Role of auditory attention in the real-time processing of simple grammar by children with specific language impairment: A preliminary investigation. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 43 (5): 499–527. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13682820701736638
Pomerantz, A. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds) Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, 57–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Radford, J., Ireson, J. and Mahon, M. (2006). Triadic dialogue in oral communication tasks: What are the implications for language learning? Language and Education 20 (3): 191–210. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500780608668723
Radford, J. (2010a). Practices of other-initiated repair and correction in SSLD classroom discourse. Applied Linguistics 31 (1): 25–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/amn046
Radford, J. (2010b). Adult participation in children’s word searches: on the use of prompting, hinting and candidate offers. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 24 (2): 83–100. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/02699200903407149
Radford, J. and Mahon, M. (2010c). Multimodal participation in storybook sharing. In H. Gardner and M. Forrester (eds) Analysing Interactions in Childhood: Methods and Applications, 208–226. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Radford, J., Blatchford, P. and Webster, R. (2011). Opening up and closing down: how teachers and TAs manage turn-taking, topic and repair in mathematics lessons. Learning and Instruction 21 (5): 625–635. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.01.004
Ridley, J., Radford, J. and Mahon, M. (2002). How do teachers manage topic and repair? Child Language Teaching and Therapy 18 (1): 43–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/0265659002ct226oa
Saxton, M. (2005). ‘Recast’ in a new light: Insights for practice from typical language studies. Child Language Teaching and Therapy 21 (1): 23–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/0265659005ct279oa
Schegloff, E. A. (1996). Confirming allusions: Towards an empirical account of action. American Journal of Sociology 104 (1): 161–216. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/230911
Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence Organisation in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791208
Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G. and Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language 53 (2): 361–82.
Seedhouse, P. (2004). The Interactional Architecture of the Language Classroom: A Conversation Analysis Perspective. Oxford: Blackwell.
Selting, M. (1996). Prosody as an activity type distinctive cue in conversation: The case of so-called ‘astonished’ questions in repair initiation. In E. Couper-Khulen and M. Selting (eds) Prosody in Conversation, 231–270). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Shield, B. M. and Dockrell, J. E. (2004). External and internal noise surveys of London primary schools. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America 115 (2): 730–738. http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.1635837
Stivers, T. (2005). Modified repeats: One method for asserting primary rights from second position. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 38 (2): 131–158. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3802_1
Tannen, D. (1989). Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue and Imagery in Conversational Discourse (Vol 6). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tarplee, C. (1996). Working on young children’s uterances: Prosodic aspects of repetition during picture labelling. In E. Couper-Khulen and M. Selting (eds) Prosody in Conversation, 406–427. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wang, C. (2005). The Pragmatics of Corrections in the Process of First Language Acquisition: A Relevance-theoretic Approach. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Loughborough, England.
Weismer, S. E. (2000). Intervention for children with developmental language delay. In D. V. M. Bishop and L. Leonard (eds) Speech and Language Impairments in Children: Causes, Characteristics, Intervention and Outcome, 157–176. Hove: Psychology Press.
Weismer, S. E. and Hesketh, L. J. (1993). The influence of prosodic and gestural cues on novel word acquisition by children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 36 (5): 1013–1025.
Weismer, S. and Hesketh, L. J. (1998) The impact of emphatic stress on novel word learning by children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 41 (6): 1444–1458.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.





Equinox Publishing Ltd - 415 The Workstation 15 Paternoster Row, Sheffield, S1 2BX United Kingdom
Telephone: +44 (0)114 221-0285 - Email: info@equinoxpub.com

Privacy Policy