Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders, Vol 7, No 1 (2016)

Intact reported speech use in traumatic brain Injury: How to think about ‘intact’ performance in the context of heterogeneity

Natalie Covington, Melissa Duff
Issued Date: 21 Jun 2016

Abstract


Communication impairments following traumatic brain injury (TBI) are notoriously difficult to capture and characterize. We sought to examine social communication abilities in adults with TBI by evaluating their use of reported speech while interacting with a clinician in the context of the Mediated Discourse Elicitation Protocol. We found that participants with TBI were nearly indistinguishable in the frequency, types, and temporal domains of their reported speech use from case-matched healthy comparison participants. Finding aspects of interactional and communicative behaviour that are not affected by TBI in some individuals, or groups of individuals, provides an important opportunity to leverage the hallmark heterogeneity typical in TBI to consider how the status of various aspects of communication may cluster together and may inform, or even predict, communicative outcome at the individual or subgroup level. Efforts to link communicative success to specific cognitive and neural profiles and to social and communicative outcomes are warranted.

Download Media

PDF (Price: £17.50 )

DOI: 10.1558/jircd.v7i1.29037

References


Adams, J. H., Doyle, D., Graham, D. I., Lawrence, A. E., McLellan, D. R., Gennarelli, T. A., Pastuszko, M. and Sakamoto, T. (1985). The contusion index: A reappraisal in human and experimental non-missile head injury. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 11 (4): 299–308. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2990.1985.tb00027.x


Bachman, D. L. (1992). The diagnosis and management of common neurologic sequelae of closed head injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 7 (2): 50–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00001199-199206000-00008


Barbey, A., Belli, A., Logan, A., Rubin, R., Zamroziewicz, M., and Operskalski, J. (2015). Network topology and dynamics in traumatic brain injury. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences 4: 92–102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2015.04.002


Besnier, N. (1993). Reported speech and affect on Nukulaelae. In J. Hill and J, Irvine (eds) Responsibility and Evidence in Oral Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.


Body, R. (2007). Decision making and somatic markers in conversation after traumatic brain injury. Aphasiology 21 (3-4): 394–408. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02687030600911450


Bond, F. and Godfrey, H. P. D. (1997). Conversation with traumatically brain injured individuals: A controlled study of behavioural changes and their impact. Brain Injury 11 (5): 319–330. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/026990597123476


Cherney, L. R., Coelho, C. A. and Shadden, B. B. (1998). Analyzing Discourse in Communicatively Impaired Adults. Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen Publishers.


Clark, H. H. and Gerrig, R. J. (1990). Quotations as demonstrations. Language 66 (4):764–805. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/414729


Coelho, C. A. (2007). Management of discourse deficits following traumatic brain injury: progress, caveats, and needs. Seminars in Speech and Language 28 (2): 122–135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-970570


Coelho, C. A., Liles, B. Z. and Duffy, R. J. (1991). The use of discourse analyses for the evaluation of higher level traumatically brain-injured adults. Brain Injury 5 (4):381–392. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/02699059109008111


Covington, N. V. and Duff, M. C. (2015). Impact of discourse elicitation procedures on use of reported speech. Poster at the Clinical Aphasiology Conference.


Damasio, A. R. (1996). The somatic marker hypothesis and the possible functions of the prefrontal cortex. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 351 (1346): 1413–1420. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1996.0125


Duff, M. C. and Brown-Schmidt, S. (2012). The hippocampus and the flexible use and processing of language. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 6 (69): 1–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00069


Duff, M. C., Hengst, J. A., Tranel, D., and Cohen, N. C. (2007). Talking across time: Using reported speech as a communicative resource in amnesia. Aphasiology 21 (6–8): 702–716. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02687030701192265


Duff, M. C., Hengst, J. A., Tranel, D., and Cohen, N. C. (2009). Hippocampal amnesia disrupts verbal play and the creative use of language in social interaction. Aphasiology 23 (7–8): 926–939. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02687030802533748


Duff, M. C., Kurczek, J., and Miller, M. A. (2015). Use of reported speech in the communicative interactions of individuals with ventromedial prefrontal cortex damage. Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders 6 (1): 97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1558/jircd.v6i1.97


Duff, M. C., Mutlu, B., Byom, L., and Turkstra, L. S. (2012). Beyond utterances: Distributed cognition as a framework for studying discourse in adults with acquired brain injury. Seminars in Speech and Language 33 (1):44–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1301162


Gordon, R. G., Rigon, A., and Duff, M. (2015). Conversational synchrony in the communicative interactions of individuals with traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 29 (11): 1300–1308. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/02699052.2015.1042408


Gordon, R. G., Tranel, D., and Duff, M. C. (2014). The physiological basis of synchronizing conversational rhythms: The role of the ventromedial prefrontal cortex. Neuropsychology 28 (4): 624–630. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/neu0000073


Gunthner, S. (1999). Polyphony and the ‘layering of voices’ in reported dialogues: An analysis of the use of prosodic devices in everyday reported speech. Journal of Pragmatics 31: 685–708. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00093-9


Heilman, K. A., Safran, A., and Geschwind, N. (1971). Closed head trauma and aphasia. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 34: 265–269. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.34.3.265


Hengst, J. A., Devanga, S., and Mosier, H. (2015). Thin vs. thick description: Analyzing representations of people and their life worlds in the literature of communication sciences and disorders (CSD). American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 24: S838–S853. http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/2015_AJSLP-14-0163


Hengst, J. A., and Duff, M. C. (2007). Clinicians as communication partners: Developing a mediated discourse elicitation protocol. Topics in Language Disorders 27 (1): 37–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00011363-200701000-00005


Hengst, J. A., Frame, S. R., Neuman-Stritzel, T., and Gannaway, R. (2005). Using others’ words: Conversational use of reported speech by individuals with aphasia and their communication partners. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 48: 137–156. http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2005/011)


Holland, A. L. (1982). When is aphasia aphasia? The problem of closed head injury. In Clinical Aphasiology Conference. Minneapolis, MN: BRK Publishers.


Hunkin, N. M., Parkin, A. J., Bradley, V. A., Burrows, E. H., Aldrich, F. K., Jansari, A., and Burdon-Cooper, C. (1995). Focal retrograde amnesia following closed head injury: A case study and theoretical account. Neuropsychologia 33 (4): 509–523. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(94)00136-D


Irvine, J. T. (1996). Shadow conversations: The indeterminacy of participant roles. In M. Silverstein and G. Urban (Eds). Natural Histories of Discourse. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.


Jorgensen, M., Togher, L. (2009) Narrative after traumatic brain injury: A comparison of monologic and jointly-produced discourse. Brain Injury 23 (9):727–740. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02699050903133954


Levin, H. S., Grossman, R. G., and Kelly, P. J. (1976). Aphasic disorder in patients with closed head injury. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 39: 1062–1070. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.39.11.1062


Malec, J. F., Brown, A. W., Leibson, C. L., Flaada, J. T., Mandrekar, J. N., Diehl, N. N., and Perkins, P. K. (2007). The mayo classification system for traumatic brain injury severity. Journal of Neurotrauma 24: 1417–1424. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/neu.2006.0245


Mattson, A. J., and Levin, H. S. (1990). Frontal lobe dysfunction following closed head injury: A review of the literature. Journal of Nervousand Mental Disease 178 (5): 282–291. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00005053-199005000-00002


McCarthy, M. (1998). Spoken Language and Applied Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.


Myers, G. (1999) Functions of reported speech in group discussions. Applied Linguistics 20 (3): 376–401. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/20.3.376


Shamay-Tsoory, S. G., Lester, H., Chisin, R., Israel, O., Bar-Shalom, R., Peretz, A., Tomer, R., Tsitrinbaum, Z., and Aharon-Peretz, J. (2005). The neural correlates of understanding the other’s distress: A positron emission tomography investigation of accurate empathy. Neuroimage 27 (2): 468–472. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.05.012


Shammi, P., and Stuss, D. T. (1999) Humour appreciation: A role of the right frontal lobe. Brain 122 (4): 657–666. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/brain/122.4.657


Snow P. C., and Douglas, J. M. (2000). Subject review: Conceptual and methodological challenges in discourse assessment with TBI speakers: Towards an understanding. Brain Injury 14 (5): 397–415. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/026990500120510


Tannen, D. (1989). Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.


Ylvisaker, M., and Feeney, T. J. (1998). Collaborative Brain Injury Prevention: Positive Everyday Routines. San Diego, CA: Singular.


Ylvisaker, M., Hanks, R., and Johnson-Greene, D. (2002). Perspectives on rehabilitation of individuals with cognitive impairment after brain injury: Rationale for reconsideration of theoretical paradigms. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 17 (3): 191–209. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00001199-200206000-00002


Ylvisaker, M., Turkstra, L. S., and Coelho, C. (2005). Behavioral and social interventions for individuals with traumatic brain injury: A summary of the research with clinical implications. Semininars in Speech and Language 26 (4): 256–267. http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-2005-922104


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.





Equinox Publishing Ltd - 415 The Workstation 15 Paternoster Row, Sheffield, S1 2BX United Kingdom
Telephone: +44 (0)114 221-0285 - Email: info@equinoxpub.com

Privacy Policy