Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders, Vol 7, No 2 (2016)

Advancing social solidarity: Preference organization in the discourse of speech-language pathology

Nina Simmons-Mackie, Roxanne W. Stoehr
Issued Date: 17 Oct 2016

Abstract


The drive for positivity is one aspect of the professional ethos of speech-language pathology. Speech-language pathologists aim to promote positive professional relationships and clinical experiences to achieve goals. Positivity, that which is favorable, affirming or accepting, is projected through professional discourse. Acquisition of positive discourse strategies by students in training is often indirect and occurs implicitly as the student interacts with others. To investigate the management of positivity as it relates to clinical training, a qualitative investigation of discourse of speech-language pathology students and clinical supervisors was undertaken. A variety of discourse strategies designed to mitigate potential conflict or promote solidarity were identified in the text and talk between students and supervisors and in clinical sessions. These strategies, consistent with the literature on preference organization, contributed to positive relationships between students and supervisors and between clinicians and clients.

Download Media

PDF (Price: £17.50 )

DOI: 10.1558/jircd.v7i2.29963

References


American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (2000). Responding to the changing needs of speech language pathology and audiology students in the 21st century: A briefing paper for academicians, practitioners, employers, and students. Rockville, MD: Author.


Breen, P. and Murphy, K. (2009). Developing professionalism in our student clinicians. Perspectives on Issues in Higher Education, 12: 64–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/ihe12.2.64


Brown, P. and Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.


Chreim, S., Williams, B. and Hinings, C. (2007). Interlevel Influences on the Reconstruction of Professional Role Identity. Academy of Management Journal, 50 (6): 115–1539. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2007.28226248


Clayman, S. (2002). Sequence and solidarity. In R. Thye and R. Lawler (eds) Group Cohesion, Trust and Solidarity (Vol. 19), 229–253. Bingly: Emerald Group Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0882-6145(02)19009-6


DeFina, A., Schiffrin, D. and Bamberg, M. (2006). Introduction. Discourse and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511584459


Delany, C. and Molloy, E. (2009). Clinical Education in the Health Professions. Chatswood, NSW: Elsevier.


Duchan J. F. (2011). How conceptual frameworks influence discovery and depictions of emotions in clinical relationships. Topics in Language Disorders, 31(4): 300–309. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/TLD.0b013e318234ef15


Dwight, D. (2005). Here’s How to do Therapy: Hands-On Core Skills in Speech-Language Pathology. San Diego, CA: Plural Publishing.


Erickson, F. (1992). Ethnographic microanalysis of interaction. In M. LeCompte, W. Millroy, and J. Preissle (eds) The Handbook of Qualitative Research in Education, 201–225. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.


Ferguson, A. and Armstrong, E. (2004). Reflections on speech-language therapists' talk: Implications for clinical practice and education. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 39: 469–477. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1368282042000226879


Gee, J. (2000–2001). Identity as an analytic lens for research. Review of Research in Education, 25: 99–125.


Godsey, R. (2011). Student perceptions of professional identity and cultural competence. (Doctoral dissertation). University of Minnesota Duluth, Duluth.


Goffman, E. (1974). Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. London: Harper and Row.


Hegde, M. (2001). PocketGuide to Treatment in Speech-Language Pathology. San Diego, CA: Singular.


Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.


Heritage, J. (1988). Explanations as accounts: A conversation analytic perspective. In C. Antaki (ed.) Analyzing Lay Explanation: A Case Book of Methods, 127–144. London, Sage.


Hicks, R. (2013). Coaching as a Leadership Style: The Art and Science of Coaching Conversations for Healthcare Professionals. Oxford: Routledge.


Kovarsky, D., Curran, M., and Nichols, N. (2009). Laughter and communicative engagement in interaction. Seminars in Speech and Language, 30: 27–36.


Kovarsky D., Schiemer C., and Murray A. (2011). Humour, rapport, and uncomfortable moments in interactions with adults with traumatic brain injury. Topics in Language Disorders, 31 (4): 325–335. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/TLD.0b013e3182358e98


LeBaron, C. (2006). Microethnography. In V. Jupp (ed.) Dictionary of Social Research Methods. London: Sage.


Meitus, I. and Weinberg, B. (1983). Diagnosis in Speech-language Pathology. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.


Miriam-Webster (2014). Merriam-Webster Dictionary. Springfield, MA Merriam-Webster, Inc. available at http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/


Pomerantz, A. and Heritage, J. (2013). Preference. In J. Sidnell and T. Stivers (eds) Handbook of Conversation Analysis, 210–228. Boston, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.


Pomerantz, A. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J. M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds), Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.


Robinson, J. and Bolden, G. (2010). Preference organization of sequence-initiating actions: The case of explicit account solicitations. Discourse Studies, 12 (4): 501–533. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1461445610371051


Sachs, J. (2005). Teacher education and the development of professional identity: Learning to be a teacher. In P. Denicolo and M. Kompf (eds) Connecting Policy and Practice: Challenges for Teaching and Learning in Schools and Universities, 5–21. Oxford: Routledge.


Sacks, H. (1987). On the preferences for agreement and contiguity in sequences in conversation. In G. Button and J. Lee (eds) Talk and Social Organisation, 57–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.


Schegloff, E. (2007). Sequence Organization in Interaction: Volume 1: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791208


Schegloff, E., Jefferson, G., and Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organisation of repair in conversation. Language, 53: 361–382. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/lan.1977.0041


Simmons-Mackie, N. (2013). Micro and macro traditions in qualitative research. In M. Ball, N. Muller, and R. Nelson (eds) The Handbook of Qualitative Research in Communication Disorders, 17–38. London: Psychology Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203798874.ch2


Simmons-Mackie, N. and Damico, J. (1999). Social role negotiation in aphasia therapy: Competence, incompetence and conflict. In D. Kovarsky, J. Duchan and M. Maxwell (eds) Constructing (In)competence: Disabling Evaluations in Clinical and Social Interactions 313–342. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Publishers.


Simmons-Mackie, N. and Damico, J. (2008). Exposed and embedded corrections in therapy for aphasia. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 43: 1–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13682820701697889


Simmons-Mackie, N. and Damico, J. (2009). Engagement in group therapy for aphasia. Seminars in Speech and Language, 30: 18–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0028-1104531


Simmons-Mackie, N. and Damico, J. (2011). Exploring clinical interaction in speech-language therapy: Narrative, discourse and relationships. In R. Fourie (ed.) Therapeutic Processes for Communication Disorders, 35–52. Hove: Psychology Press.


Simmons-Mackie, N., Damico, J., and Damico, H. (1999). A qualitative study of feedback in aphasia therapy. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 8: 218–230. http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360.0803.218


Simmons-Mackie, N., Elman, R., Holland, A., and Damico, J. (2007) Management of discourse in group therapy for aphasia. Topics in Language Disorders, 27: 5–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00011363-200701000-00003


Stokes, J. and McCormick, M. (2014). Speech and Language Therapy and Professional Identity: Challenging Received Wisdom. Guildford: J and R Press.


Varghese, M., Morgan, B., Johnston, B., and Johnson, K. (2005). Theorising language teacher identity: Three perspectives and beyond. Journal of Language, Identity and Education, 4 (1): 21–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327701jlie0401_2


Walsh, I. (2007). Small talk is ‘big talk’ in clinical discourse: Appreciating the value of conversation in clinical discourse. Topics in Language Disorders, 27: 24–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00011363-200701000-00004


Walsh, I. and Duchan, J. (2011). Product and process depictions of rapport between clients and their speech-language pathologists during clinical interaction. In R. Fourie (ed.) Therapeutic Processes for Communication Disorders, 53–66. Hove: Psychology Press.


Walsh, I. and Kovarsky, D. (2011). Establishing relationships in speech-language therapy when working alongside people with mental health disorders. In R. Fourie (ed.) Therapeutic Processes for Communication Disorders, 123–138. Hove: Psychology Press.


Walsh, I. and Leahy, M. (2009). ‘Cajoling’ as a means of engagement in the dysphagia clinic. Seminars in Speech and Language, 30: 37–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0028-1104533


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.





Equinox Publishing Ltd - 415 The Workstation 15 Paternoster Row, Sheffield, S1 2BX United Kingdom
Telephone: +44 (0)114 221-0285 - Email: info@equinoxpub.com

Privacy Policy