Nature is Relative

Religious Affiliation, Environmental Attitudes, and Political Constraints on the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation

Authors

  • Kathleen Pickering
  • Benjamin Jewell

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/jsrnc.v2i1.135

Keywords:

Lakota, Native American belief systems, indigenous ecological knowledge

Abstract

An industrial model of conservation defines nature as a relative space with minimal human impacts. For Native communities, such as the Lakota on the Pine Ridge Reservation in South Dakota, nature is part of an extended kinship system occupied by various relatives, both animate and inanimate, human and non-human. As a result, Lakota beliefs and values enhance positive environmental attitudes, but are embedded in religious perspectives rather than conservation of an abstracted nature. We conceptualize the interactions between individual ethics and actual conservation behavior as existing in three layers. At the grassroots layer, defined through individual and family relationships, spiritual ties to nature are generated through various Lakota philosophies, including equality across species. At the tribal or political layer, Lakota politicians often use Lakota ‘traditions’ strategically to reassert tribal sovereignty and control over natural resources and development policy, as well as to legitimize their quest for mainstream political spoils. At the structural layer of the federal government, individual beliefs are often violated by the dominant conservation paradigm, using scientific narratives and disembodied economic returns to replace spiritual values in natural resources.

Author Biographies

  • Kathleen Pickering
    Department of Anthropology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1787, USA
  • Benjamin Jewell
    Colorado State University

References

Atran, Scott, et al. 2002 ‘Folkecology, Cultural Epidemiology, and the Spirit of the Commons: A Garden Experiment in the Maya Lowlands, 1991–2001’, Current Anthropology 43.3: 421-50. doi:10.1086/339528

Berkes, Fikret 1999 Sacred Ecology: Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Resource Management (Philadelphia: Taylor & Francis).

Berkes, Fikret, and Carl Folke 1998 Linking Social and Ecological Systems: Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

Biolsi, Thomas 1992 Organizing the Lakota: the Political Economy of the New Deal on the Pine Ridge and Rosebud Reservations (Tucson: University of Arizona Press).

Bourdieu, Pierre 1977 Outline of a Theory of Practice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

Deloria, Ella 1998 [1944] Speaking of Indians (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press).

DeMallie, Raymond J., and Douglas R. Parks 1987 Sioux Indian Religion (Norman: University of Oklahoma Press).

Dove, Michael R. 2006 ‘Indigenous People and Environmental Politics’, Annual Review of Anthropology 35: 191-208. doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.35.081705.123235

Freeman, Milton M.R., et al. 1998 Inuit Whaling and Sustainability (Lantham, MD: Altamira Press).

Gramsci, Antonio 1989 Antonio Gramsci Reader: Selected Writings, 1916–1935 (ed. David Gorgacs; New York: Schocken Books).

Halperin, Rhoda H. 1984 ‘Polanyi, Marx, and the Institutional Paradigm’, in Barry L. Isaac (ed.), Research in Economic Anthropology, VI (Greenwich, CT: JAI Press): 245-72.

‘Karl Polanyi’s Concept of Householding: Resistance and Livelihood in an Appalachian Region’, in Barry L. Isaac (ed.), Research in Economic Anthropology, XIII (Greenwich, CT: JAI Press): 93-116.

Hassrick, Royal B. 1964 The Sioux (Norman: University of Oklahoma Press).

Hunn, E.S., et al. 2003 ‘Huna Tlingit Traditional Environmental Knowledge, Conservation, and the Management of A “Wilderness” Park’, Current Anthropology 44 (Supplement): S79-S103. doi:10.1086/377666

Jewell, Benjamin 2006 ‘Lakota Struggles for Cultural Survival: History, Health, and Reservation Life’, Nebraska Anthropologist 21: 129-46.

Krech, Shepard 1999 The Ecological Indian: Myth and History (New York: W.W. Norton).

Marx, Karl 2006 [1859] ‘Preface to a Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy’, in Robert J. Antonio (ed.), Marx and Modernity: Key Readings and Commentary (Malden, MA: Blackwell): 65-66.

Medicine, Beatrice 2001 Learning to be an Anthropologist and Remaining ‘Native’ (Urbana: University of Illinois Press).

Mendell, Marguerite 2003 ‘Karl Polanyi and Instituted Processes of Economic Democratization’, in Ronnie Ramlogan and Mark Harvey (eds.), Polanyian Perspectives on Instituted Economic Processes, Development and Transformation, Conference Proceedings, October 23-25 (Manchester: ESRC, Center for Research on Innovation and Competition, University of Manchester): 1-13.

Niezen, Ronald 2003 The Origins of Indigenism: Human Rights and the Politics of Identity (Berkeley: University of California Press, Berkeley).

Pickering, Kathleen A. 1995 ‘Articulation of the Lakota Mode of Production and the Euro American Fur Trade’, in Jennifer S.H. Brown, W.J. Eccles, and Donald P. Heldman (eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth North American Fur Trade Conference (Lansing: Michigan State University Press): 57-69.

Lakota Culture, World Economy (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press).

‘Decolonizing Time Regimes: Lakota Conceptions of Work, Economy and Society’, American Anthropologist 106.1: 85-97. doi:10.1525/aa.2004.106.1.85

Polanyi, Karl 1957 The Economy as Instituted Process’, in Karl Polanyi, Conrad M. Arensberg, and Harry W. Pearson (eds.), Trade and Markets in Early Empires: Economies in History and Theory (Glencoe, IL: Free Press): 243-306.

Price, Catherine 1996 The Oglala People, 1841–1879: A Political History (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press).

Robertson, Paul 2002 The Power of the Land: Identity, Ethnicity, and Class Among the Oglala Lakota (New York: Routledge).

Sherman, Richard T. n.d. ‘Honor the Earth Northern Plains Buffalo Caretaker Survey Results, Manderson, SD’ (unpublished manuscript).

Stevens, Phillip J. 1988 ‘Compensation for the Plundering of $18 Billion of Sioux Gold, Silver and Other Natural Resources from the Black Hills is Unjust and Unacceptable’, Wicazo Sa Review 4.1: 49-50. doi:10.2307/1409086

Village Earth n.d. ‘The Political Economy of Land on the Pine Ridge Reservation’ (unpublished presentation by David Bartecci).

Walker, James R. 1982 Lakota Society (ed. Raymond J. DeMallie; Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press).

Warren, D. Michael, and Jennifer Pinkston 2000 ‘Indigenous African Resource Management of a Tropical Rainforest Ecosystem: A Case Study of the Yoruba of Ara, Nigeria’, in Fikret Berkes and Carl Folke (eds.), Linking Social and Ecological Systems: Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press): 158-89.

White, Lynn, Jr 1967 ‘The Historical Roots of our Ecologic Crises’, Science 155: 1203-1207. doi:10.1126/science.155.3767.1203

Wood, W. Raymond, and Margot Liberty (eds.) 1980 Anthropology on the Great Plains (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press).

Young Bear, Severt, and R.D. Theisz 1994 Standing in the Light (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press).

Published

2008-04-12

How to Cite

Pickering, K., & Jewell, B. (2008). Nature is Relative: Religious Affiliation, Environmental Attitudes, and Political Constraints on the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation. Journal for the Study of Religion, Nature and Culture, 2(1), 135-158. https://doi.org/10.1558/jsrnc.v2i1.135

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >>