Brains, bodies, contextualising activity and language

do humans (and bonobos) have a language faculty and can they do without one?

Authors

  • Paul J. Thibault Agder University College

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/lhs.2005.1.1.99

Keywords:

Combinatorial Expansion, Distributed Cognition and Semiosis, Language Development, Language Faculty, Protolanguage, Recursion

Abstract

This paper reviews selected aspects of Hauser et al..’s (2002) distinction between ‘the faculty of language – narrow sense’ and ‘the faculty of language – broad sense’, with a specific focus on their view that recursion is ‘the only uniquely human component of the faculty of language’ (2002: 1569). In critically examining this distinction and its implications, I shall propose and develop an alternative account of recursion, or what I shall prefer to discuss in terms of ‘combinatorial expansion’, at the same time that I shall explore the theoretical implications of the two views. The alternative view that I shall develop argues that brains, bodies, activity, and context are inseparable from language, and that the split between formal and bodily dimensions of language is unhelpful for understanding how language activity connects brain, body, and the ecosocial environment in which such activity takes place. In developing this alternative, I shall refer to Michael Halliday’s interpretation of one child’s transition from protolanguage to language as well as to the symbolic achievements of Kanzi, the language-competent bonobo who has been co-reared by humans, notably Susan Savage-Rumbaugh, at the Center for Research in Language at Cognition, at the State University of Georgia, Atlanta, USA.

Author Biography

  • Paul J. Thibault, Agder University College

    Paul J. Thibault,Professor of Linguistics and Media Communication, Faculty of Humanities, Agder University College, Kristiansand, Norway

References

Benson, J. D. (2002) Bonobo-human discourse: where does Kanzi’s ‘bad surprise’ come from? In C. Tatilon and A. Baudot (eds) La Linguistique fonctionnelle au tournant du siècle 201–6. Toronto: Éditions du GREF.

Chomsky, N. (1965) Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

Cowley, S. J. (2005) Languaging: how babies and bonobos lock on to human modes of life. International Journal of Computational Cognition 3(1): 44–56.

Damasio, A. (1999) The Feeling of What Happens: body, emotion and the making of consciousness. London: William Heinemann.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1975) Learning How to Mean: explorations in the development of language. London: Edward Arnold.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1994) [1985] Introduction to Functional Grammar. Second edition. London and Melbourne: Arnold.

Halliday, M. A. K. (2004) The Language of Early Childhood. Collected Works of M. A. K. Halliday Vol. 4. Edited J. J. Webster. London and New York: Continuum.

Hauser, M. D., Chomsky, N., and Fitch, W. T. (2002) The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science Vol. 298, 22 November 2002: 1569–78.

Lemke, J. L. (2000) Material sign processes and emergent ecosocial organization. In Peter Bøgh Andersen, Claus Emmeche, Niels Ole Finnemann, and Peder Voetmann Christiansen (eds) Downward Causation: minds, bodies and matter 181–213. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.

Lewontin, R. (2001) [2000] The Triple Helix: gene, organism and environment. Cambridge, MA and London, England: Harvard University Press.

Maturana, H. R. and Varela, F. J. (1980) Autopoesis and Cognition. Dordrecht: Reidel.

Salthe, S. N. (1993) Development and Evolution: complexity and change in biology. Cambridge, MA and London: The MIT Press.

Silverstein, M. (1997) The improvisational performance of culture in realtime discursive practice. In R. K. Sawyer (ed.) Creativity in Performance 265–312. Greenwich, Conn.: Ablex.

Thelen, E. and Smith, L. B. (1994) A Dynamic Systems Approach to the Development of Cognition and Action. Cambridge, MA and London: The MIT Press.

Thibault, P. J. (1986) The cognitive hypothesis: a critical comment. In Text, Discourse, and Context: a social semiotic perspective 26–45. Victoria University, Toronto: Monographs, Working Papers and Prepublications of the Toronto Semiotic Circle, Vol. 3.

Thibault, P. J. (1998) Code. In P. Bouissac (ed.) The Encyclopedia of Semiotics 125–9. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.

Thibault, P. J. (2004a) Agency and Consciousness in Discourse: self-other dynamics as a complex system. London and New York: Continuum.

Thibault, P. J. (2004b) Agency, individuation and meaning-making: reflections on an episode of bonobo-human interaction. In G. Williams and A. Lukin (eds) The Development of Language: functional perspectives on species and individuals 112–36. London and New York: Continuum.

Thibault, P. J. (2005) The interpersonal gateway to the meaning of mind: unifying the inter- and intraorganism perspectives on language. In R. Hasan, C. M. I. M. Matthiessen, and J. J. Webster (eds) Continuing Discourse on Language: a functional perspective. London: Equinox.

Vygotsky, L. (1986) [1934] Thought and Language. Trans. Alex Kozulin. Cambridge, MA and London: The MIT Press.

Published

2005-04-01

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Thibault, P. J. (2005). Brains, bodies, contextualising activity and language: do humans (and bonobos) have a language faculty and can they do without one?. Linguistics and the Human Sciences, 1(1), 99-125. https://doi.org/10.1558/lhs.2005.1.1.99