‘It’s really a great presentation!’

Appraising candidates in job interviews

Authors

  • Caroline Lipovsky University of Sydney

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/lhs.v4i2.161

Keywords:

Appraisal theory, Attitude, evaluation, impression management, job interviews, solidarity, Systemic Functional Linguistics

Abstract

It is crucial that interviewers in job interviews make a good impression on candidates so they can attract the right person for the position they need to fill. The large body of literature on job interviews however mostly focuses on interviewers’ impressions of the candidates. This study aims at redressing the imbalance by examining interviewers’ impression management strategies. In particular, it explores the ways in which interviewers evaluate candidates in the course of their interviews. Drawing on systemic functional linguistics, and in particular on Appraisal theory (Martin and White, 2005), this paper examines a set of authentic job interviews in French, or French and English. The analysis of the job interviews is complemented by analysis of participants’ comments on their interviews. The first analysis reveals an evaluative stance that is overwhelmingly positive and favourable to candidates, while the second shows candidates’ positive reaction and alignment to their interviewers’ appraisal.

Author Biography

  • Caroline Lipovsky, University of Sydney

    Lecturer

References

Adelswärd, V. (1988) Styles of Success: On Impression Management as Collaborative Action in Job Interviews. Linköping: Linköping University.

Adelswärd, V. (1989) Laughter and dialogue: The social significance of laughter in institutional discourse. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 12: 107?136. doi:10.1017/S03325865 00002018

Akinnaso, F. N. and Ajirotutu, C. S. (1982) Performance and ethnic style in job interviews. In J. Gumperz (ed.) Language and Social Identity, 119?144. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bardovi-Harlig, K. and Hartford, B. S. (1993) The language of comembership. Research on Language and Social Interaction 26: 227?257. doi:10.1207/s15327973rlsi2603_1

Clark, C., Drew, P. and Pinch, T. (2003) Managing prospect affiliation and rapport in reallife sales encounters. Discourse Studies 5 (1): 5?31. doi:10.1177/1461445603005001837

Drew, P. and Heritage, J. (1992) Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Eggins, S. and Slade, D. (1997) Analysing Casual Conversation. London: Cassell.

Ernoult, V. (2004) Recruter sans se Tromper. Paris: Éditions d'Organisation.

Gumperz, J. (1992) Interviewing in intercultural situations. In P. Drew and J. Heritage (eds) Talk at Work, 302?327. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Gumperz, J. and Roberts, C. (1991) Understanding in intercultural encounters. In J. Verschueren and J. Blommaert (eds) The Pragmatics of Intercultural and International Communication, 51?90. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1994) An Introduction to Functional Grammar (2nd edition). London: Edward Arnold.

Hood, S. (2004) Appraising Research: Taking a Stance in Academic Writing. Unpublished PhD thesis. University of Technology, Sydney.

Hood, S. and Forey, G. (2008) The interpersonal dynamics of call-centre interactions: Coconstructing the rise and fall of emotion. Discourse & Communication 2 (4): 389?409.

Hood, S. and Martin, J. R. (2007) Invoking attitude: The play of graduation in appraising discourse. In R. Hasan, C. Matthiessen and J. Webster (eds) Continuing Discourse on Language: A Functional Perspective, 737?762. London: Equinox.

Kerekes, J. A. (2001) The Co-construction of a Successful Gatekeeping Encounter: Strategies of Linguistically Diverse Speakers. Unpublished PhD thesis. Stanford University.

Komter, M. (1991) Conflict and Cooperation in Job Interviews: A Study of Talk, Tasks and Ideas. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.

Kress, G. and Fowler, R. (1979) Interviews. In R. Fowler, B. Hodge, G. Kress and T. Trew (eds) Language and Control, 63?80. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Lipovsky, C (July 2004). Small Talk, Name-dropping and Personal Disclosure: Establishing Co-membership in Job Interviews. Presentation given at the Applied Linguistics Association of Australia Congress. Adelaide.

Lipovsky, C (2010). Negotiating Solidarity: A Social-linguistic Approach to Job Interviews. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Martin, J. R. (2000) Beyond exchange: Appraisal systems in English. In S. Hunston and G. Thompson (eds) Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse, 142?175. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Martin, J. R. and Rose, D. (2003) Working with Discourse: Meaning beyond the Clause. London: Continuum.

Martin, J. R. and White, P. R. R. (2005) The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

McComb, K. B. and Jablin, F. M. (1984) Verbal correlates of interviewer emphatic listening and employment interview outcomes. Communication Monographs 51: 353?371. doi:10.1080/03637758409390207

Mehan, H. (1979) Learning Lessons: Social Organization in the Classroom. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.

Roberts, C. and Campbell, S. (2006). Talk on Trial: Job Interviews, Language and Ethnicity. London: King’s College London on behalf of the Department for Work and Pensions.

Roberts, C. and Sayers, P. (1987) Keeping the gate: How judgements are made in interethnic interviews. In K. Knapp, W. Enninger and A. Knapp-Potthoff (eds) Analyzing Intercultural Communication, 111?135. Berlin, New York and Amsterdam: Mouton de Gruyter.

Schiffrin, D. (1994) Approaches to Discourse. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers.

White, P. R. R. (2002) Appraisal. In J. Verschueren, J. Oestman, J. Blommaert and C. Bulcaen (eds) The Handbook of Pragmatics, 1?27. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

White, P. R. R. (2005) Appraisal Website. Retrieved on 1 December 2009 from www.grammatics.com/appraisal.

Published

2011-05-06

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Lipovsky, C. (2011). ‘It’s really a great presentation!’: Appraising candidates in job interviews. Linguistics and the Human Sciences, 4(2), 161-185. https://doi.org/10.1558/lhs.v4i2.161