Linguistics and the Human Sciences, Vol 10, No 2 (2014)

Writing a report: A study of preadolescents’ use of informational language

Fang Zhihui
Issued Date: 29 Sep 2015

Abstract


Reading and writing informational genres is a literacy skill highly valued in school, workplace and society. One key to the development of this skill is mastering the lexicogrammatical resources that are functional for realizing these genres. Drawing on a genre-based theory of learning and using analytical tools provided by systemic functional linguistics, this cross-sectional longitudinal study examined patterns of language use in Grades 3–5 students’ writing of report, an informational genre whose main function is to present factual information on a topic. Quantitative and descriptive analyses of their written reports on a common, familiar science topic reveal that the preadolescents demonstrated considerable expertise in instantiating certain features of report (e.g. timelessness, non-particularization), but were much less successful in using language to construe its other features (e.g. technicality, density, thing-focus, abstraction, objectivity). Instead, the students tended to draw on the grammatical resources of everyday spontaneous speech, presenting information in an interactive, non-authoritative and unconventionally structured manner. Furthermore, while considerable variation existing between and within the three grade levels in the students’ working knowledge of report, no clear, consistent developmental pattern emerged from the analyses. In fact, the development seems best characterized as non-linear and feature-specific. These findings raise a number of important developmental and pedagogical issues that have practical implications for language and literacy educators.

Download Media

PDF (Price: £17.50 )

DOI: 10.1558/lhs.v10i2.28556

References


American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) (1993) Benchmarks for Science Literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.


Bereiter, C. and Scardamalia, M. (1987) The Psychology of Written Composition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.


Bernstein, B. (1996) Pedagogy, Symbolic Control, and Identity: Theory, Research, Critique. London: Taylor and Francis.


Blake, M. (1996) Crocodiles. Bothell, WA: The Wright Group.


Britton, J., Burgess, T., Martin, N., McLeod, A. and Rosen, H. (1975) The Development of Writing Abilities, 11–18. London: Macmillan.


Caswell, L. and Duke, N. (1998) Non-narrative as a catalyst for literacy development. Language Arts 75 (2): 108–117.


Chafe, W. (1982) Integration and involvement in speaking, writing, and oral literature. In D. Tannen (ed.) Spoken and Written Language: Exploring Orality and Literacy, 35–53. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.


Chall, J. (1996) Stages of Reading Development (2nd edn). New York: Harcourt Brace.


Chall, J., Jacobs, V. and Baldwin, L. (1990) The Reading Crisis: Why Poor Children Fall Behind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.


Chapman, M. (1994) The emergence of genres: Some findings from an examination of first grade writing. Written Communication 11 (3): 348–380. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0741088394011003003


Christie, F. and Derewianka, B. (2008) School Discourse: Learning to Write Across the Years of Schooling. London: Continuum.


Cope, B. and Kalantzis, M. (1993) The Powers of Literacy: A Genre Approach to Teaching Writing. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.


Derewianka, B. (1990) Exploring How Texts Work. Maryborough, Vic. (Australia): Primary English Teaching Association.


Donovan, C. (2001) Children’s development and control of written story and informational genres: Insights from one elementary school. Research in the Teaching of English 35 (3): 394–447.


Donovan, C. and Smolkin, L. (2002) Considering genre, content, and visual features in the selection of trade books for science instruction. The Reading Teacher 55 (6): 502–520.


Dreher, M. J. (1998/1999) Motivating children to read more nonfiction. The Reading Teacher 52 (4): 414–417.


Duke, N. and Kays, J. (1998) ‘Can I say “once upon a time”?’: Kindergarten children developing knowledge of information book language. Early Childhood Research Quarterly 13 (2): 295–318. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2006(99)80041-6


Duke, N. (2000) 3.6 minutes per day: The scarcity of informational texts in first grade. Reading Research Quarterly 35 (2): 202–225. http://dx.doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.35.2.1


Duke, N. and Bennett-Armistead, V. S. (2003) Reading and Writing Informational Text in the Primary Grades: Research-Based Practices. New York: Scholastic.


Fang, Z. (2000) The grammatical construction of scientific literacy. National Reading Conference Yearbook 49: 367–382.


Fang, Z. (2010) Language and Literacy in Inquiry-Based Science Classrooms, Grades 3–8. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin and Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association.


Fang, Z. (2012) Language correlates of disciplinary literacy. Topics in Language Disorders 32 (1): 19–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/TLD.0b013e31824501de


Fang, Z. and Wang, Z. (2011) Beyond rubrics: Using functional language analysis to evaluate student writing. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy 34 (2): 147–165.


Ferguson, C. and Slobin, D. (1973) Studies of Child Language Development. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.


Freedman, A. (1993) Show and tell? The role of explicit teaching in the learning of new genres. Research in the Teaching of English 27 (3): 222–251.


Gall, M., Gall, J. and Borg, W. (2006) Educational Research: An Introduction (8th edn). New York: Longman.


Halliday, M. A. K. and Martin, J. R. (1993) Writing Science: Literacy and Discursive Power. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.


Halliday, M. and Matthiessen, C. (2004) An Introduction to Functional Grammar (3rd edn). London: Arnold.


Hasan, R. (1996) Literacy, everyday talk and society. In R. Hasan and G. Williams (eds.) Literacy in Society, 377–424. New York: Longman.


Hasan, R. (1984) Coherence and cohesive harmony. In J. Flood (ed.) Understanding Reading Comprehension, 181–263. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.


Hasan, R. (1999) The disempowerment game: Bourdieu and language in literacy. Linguistics and Education 10 (1): 25–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0898-5898(99)80104-1


Jacobs, J. S., Morrison, T. G. and Swinyard, W. R. (2000) Reading aloud to students: A national probability study of classroom reading practices of elementary school teachers. Reading Psychology 21 (3): 171–193. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02702710050144331


Kamberelis, G. (1999) Genre development and learning: Children writing stories, science reports, and poems. Research in the Teaching of English 33 (4): 403–460.


Kress, G. (1989) Linguistic Processes in Sociocultural Practice. New York: Oxford University Press.


Kress, G. (1994) Learning to Write (2nd edn). New York: Routledge and Kagan Paul.


Kress, G. (2003) Literacy in the New Media Age. London: Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203164754


Leal, (1992). The nature of talk about three types of text during peer group discussions. Journal of Reading Behaviour 24 (3), 313–338. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10862969209547780


Luke, A. (1996) Genres of power? Literacy education and the production of capital. In R. Hasan and G. Williams (eds.) Literacy in Society, 308–338. New York: Longman.


Mallinson, G., Mallinson, J., Froschauer, L., Harris, J., Lewis, M., and Valentino, C. (1991). Science Horizons. Morristown, NJ: Silver Burdett and Ginn.


Martin, J. R. (1989) Factual Writing: Exploring and Challenging Social Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.


Martin, J. R. (1997) Analysing genre: Functional parameters. In F. Christie and J. R. Martin (eds), Genre and Institutions: Social Processes in the Workplace and School, 1–39. London: Cassell.


Martin, J. (1998) Linguistics and the consumer: The practice of theory. Linguistics and Education 9 (4): 411–448. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0898-5898(97)90008-5


Martin, J. (2009) Genre and language learning: A social semiotic perspective. Linguistics and Education 20 (1): 10–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2009.01.003


Martin, J., Matthiessen, C. and Painter, C. (1997) Working with Functional Grammar. Sydney, Australia: Arnold.


Moss, B. and Newton, E. (2002) An examination of the informational text genre in recent basal readers. Reading Psychology 23 (1): 1–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/027027102317345376


National Assessment Governing Board (2010) Reading Framework for the 2011 National Assessment of Educational Progress. Washington, DC: US Department of Education.


Newkirk, T. (1987) The non-narrative writing of young children. Research in the Teaching of English 21 (2): 121–144.


Palermo, D. and Molfese, D. (1972) Language acquisition from age five onward. Psychological Bulletin 78 (6): 409–428. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0033707


Pappas, C. (1991) Fostering full access to literacy by including informational books. Language Arts 68 (6): 449–462.


Pappas, C. (1993) Is narrative ‘primary’?: Some insights from kindergartners’ pretend readings of stories and information books. Journal of Reading Behaviour 25 (1): 97–129. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10862969309547803


Pea, R. and Kurland, D. (1987) Cognitive technologies for writing. Review of Research in Education 14 (1): 227–326. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1167314


Pentimonti, J. M., Zucker, T. A., Justice, L. M. and Kaderavek, J. N. (2010) Informational text use in preschool classroom read alouds. Reading Teacher 63 (8): 656–665. http://dx.doi.org/10.1598/RT.63.8.4


Perera, K. (1984) Children’s Writing and Reading: Analysing Classroom Language. London: Basil Blackwell.


Pressley, M. Rankin, J. and Yokoi, L. (1996) A survey of instructional practices in primary teachers nominated as effective in promoting literacy. The Elementary School Journal 96 (4): 363–384. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/461834


Purcell-Gates, V., Duke, N. K. and Martineau, J. A. (2007) Learning to read and write genre-specific text: Roles of authentic experience and explicit teaching. Reading Research Quarterly 42 (1): 8–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.42.1.1


Rose, D. (2009) Writing as linguistic mastery: The development of genre-based literacy pedagogy. In R. Beard, D. Myhill, J. Riley and M. Nystrand (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Writing Development, 151–166. London: Sage.


Sanacore, J. and Palumbo, A. (2009) Understanding the fourth-grade slump: Our point of view. The Educational Forum 73 (1): 67–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00131720802539648


Schleppegrell, M. J. (1998) Grammar as resource: Writing a description. Research in the Teaching of English 32 (2): 182–211.


Schleppegrell, M. J. (2004) The Language of Schooling: A Functional Linguistics Perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.


Solsken, J., Willett, J. and Wilson-Keenan, J. (2000) Cultivating hybrid texts in multicultural classrooms: Promise and challenge. Research in the Teaching of English 35 (2): 179–212.


Sparks, J. E. (1982) Write for Power. Manhattan Beach, CA: Communication Associates.


Wollman-Bonilla, J. (2000) Teaching science writing for first graders: Genre learning and recontextualization. Research in the Teaching of English 35 (1): 35–65.


Yopp, R. H. and Yopp, H. K. (2006) Informational texts as read alouds at school and home. Journal of Literacy Research 38 (1): 37–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15548430jlr3801_2


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.





Equinox Publishing Ltd - 415 The Workstation 15 Paternoster Row, Sheffield, S1 2BX United Kingdom
Telephone: +44 (0)114 221-0285 - Email: info@equinoxpub.com

Privacy Policy