Counseling and new media technologies: A comparison of problem presentations in e-mail and in chat

doi:10.1558/cam.18298

Communication & Medicine, Vol 12, No 2-3 (2015)

Counseling and new media technologies: A comparison of problem presentations in e-mail and in chat

Wyke Stommel, Fleur Van der Houwen

Issued Date: 7 Nov 2016

Abstract

In this article, we examine problem presentations in e-mail and chat counseling. Previous studies of online counseling have found that the medium (e.g., chat, email) impacts the unfolding interaction. However, the implications for counseling are unclear. We focus on problem presentations and use conversation analysis to compare 15 chat and 22 e-mail interactions from the same counseling program. We find that in e-mail counseling, counselors open up the interactional space to discuss various issues, whereas in chat, counselors restrict problem presentations and give the client less space to elaborate. We also find that in e-mail counseling, clients use narratives to present their problem and orient to its seriousness and legitimacy, while in chat counseling, they construct problem presentations using a symptom or a diagnosis. Furthermore, in email counseling, clients close their problem presentations stating completeness, while in chat counseling, counselors treat clients’ problem presentations as incomplete. Our findings shed light on how the medium has implications for counseling.

Download Media

PDF (Price: £17.50 ) Restricted Access

DOI: 10.1558/cam.18298

References

Byrne, P. and Long, B. (1976) Doctors Talking to Patients: A Study of the Verbal Behaviours of Doctors in the Consultation. London: Royal College of General Practitioners.

Danby, S., Baker, C. and Emmison, M. (2005) Four observations on openings in calls to Kids Help Line. In C. Baker, M. Emmison and A. Firth (eds) Calling for Help: Language and Social Interaction in Telephone Helplines, 133–151. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/pbns.143.10dan

Danby S., Butler, C. and Emmison, M. (2009) When ‘listeners can’t talk’: Comparing active listening in opening sequences of telephone and online counselling. Australian Journal of Communication 36 (3): 91–113.

Egan, G. (2007) Deskundig hulpverlenen [Professional Counseling]. Assen, Netherlands: Van Gorcum.

Ekberg, S., Barnes, R., Kessler, D., Malpass, A. and Shaw, A. (2013) Managing the therapeutic relationship in online cognitive behavioural therapy for depression: Therapists’ treatment of clients’ contributions. Language@Internet 10: Article 4. Retrieved from http://www.languageatinternet.org/articles/2013/Ekberg

Fisher, S. and Groce, S. (1990) Accounting practices in medical interviews. Language in Society 19 (2): 225–250. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S004740450001438X

Harris, J., Danby, S., Butler, C. W. and Emisson, M. (2012) Extending client-centered support: Counselors’ proposals to shift from e-mail to telephone counseling. Text & Talk 32 (1): 21–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/text-2012-0002

Heritage, J. and Clayman, S. (2010) Talk in Action: Interactions, Identities and Institutions. Oxford: Blackwell. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781444318135

Heritage, J. and Robinson, J. (2006a) Accounting for the visit: Giving reasons for seeking medical care. In J. Heritage and D. Maynard (eds) Communication in Medical Care: Interaction between Primary Care Physicians and Patients, 48–85. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Heritage, J. and Robinson, J. (2006b) The structure of patients’ presenting concerns: Physicians’ opening questions. Health Communication 19 (2): 89–102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327027hc1902_1

Jefferson, G. (1984). On stepwise transition from talk about a trouble to inappropriately next-positioned matters. In J. M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds) Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, 346–369. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Jefferson, G. (1988) On the sequential organization of troubles talk in ordinary conversation. Social Problems 35 (4): 418–441. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/800595

Jefferson, G. and Lee, J. (1981) The rejection of advice: Managing the problematic convergence of ‘troubles-telling’ and a ‘service encounter’. Journal of Pragmatics 5: 399–422. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(81)90026-6

Jol, G. A. H. and van der Houwen, F. (2014) Police interviews with child witnesses: Pursuing a response with maar (= Dutch but)- prefaced questions. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law 21 (1): 113–138.

Karhila, P., Kettunen, T. and Poskiparta, M. (2003) Negotiation in type 2 diabetes counseling: From problem recognition to mutual acceptance during lifestyle counseling. Qualitative Health Research 13 (9): 1205–1224. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1049732303257153

Kotthoff, H. (1993) Agreement and concession in disputes: On the context sensitivity of preference structures. Language in Society 22 (2): 193–216. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500017103

Kraus, R., Stricker, G. and Speyer, C. (2010) Online Counseling: A Handbook for Mental Health Professionals. London: Academic Press.

Labov, W. and Waletzky, J. (1997) Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. Journal of Narrative and Life History 7 (1): 3–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/jnlh.7.02nar

Mazeland, H. and Huiskes, M. (1997) ‘Maar’ als sequentiële conjunctie: Het hernemend gebruik [Dutch ‘but’ as sequential conjunction: Its resuming use]. Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing 19 (3): 265–277.

Parsons, T. (1951) The Social System. London: Tavistock.

Pennebaker, J. W. (1997) Writing about emotional experiences as a therapeutic process. Psychological Science 8 (3): 162–166. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00403.x

Peräkylä, A., Antaki, C., Vehviläinen, S. and Leuder, I. (2008) Conversation Analysis and Psychotherapy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511490002

Peräkylä, A. and Vehviläinen, S. (2003) Conversation Analysis and the professional stocks of interactional knowledge. Discourse and Society 14 (6): 727–750. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/09579265030146003

Pomerantz, A. (1984a) Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J. M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds) Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, 57–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00148128

Pomerantz, A. (1984b) Pursuing a response. In J. M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds) Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, 152–163. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Pomerantz, A. (1986) Extreme case formulations. Human Studies 9 (2–3): 219–229.

Riper, H., Smit, F. and Zanden, R. (eds) (2007) E-Mental Health: High Tech, High Touch, High Trust Programmeringsstudie e-mental health [E-Mental Health: High Tech, High Touch, High Trust Program Study E-Mental Health], Utrecht: Trimbos Instituut.

Roter, D. and Hall, J. (2006) Doctors Talking with Patients/Patients Talking with Doctors: Improving Communication in Medical Visits. Westport, CT: Praeger.

Schalken, F., Wolters, W. and Tilanus, W. (2010) Handboek online hulpverlening; hoe onperoonlijk contact heel persoonlijk wordt [Handbook on Online Counseling: How Impersonal Contact Becomes very Personal]. Houten, Netherlands: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum.

Schegloff, E. and Sacks, H. (1973) Opening up closings. Semiotica 8 (4): 289–327. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289

Stivers, T. (2002) Presenting the problem in pediatric encounters: ‘Symptoms only’ versus ‘candidate diagnosis’ presentations. Health Communication 14 (3): 299–338. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327027HC1403_2

Stommel, W. (2012) Salutations, closings and pronouns: Some aspects of recipient design in online counselling. Communication and Medicine 9 (2): 145–158. http://dx.doi.org/10.1558/cam.v9i2.145

Stommel, W. and te Molder, H. (2015) Counselling online and over the phone: When pre-closing questions fail as a closing device. Research on Language and Social Interaction 48 (3): 281–300. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2015.1058605

Stommel, W. and van der Houwen, F. (2013) Formulation in ‘trouble’ chat sessions. Language@Internet 10: Article 3. Retrieved from http://www.languageatinternet.org/articles/2013/stommel

Stommel, W. and van der Houwen, F. (2014) Complaining and the management of ‘face’ in online counseling. Qualitative Health Research 24 (2): 183–193. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1049732313519706

Suler, J. (2004) The online disinhibition effect. CyberPsychology & Behavior 7 (3): 321–326. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/1094931041291295

ten Have, P. (1999) Doing Conversation Analysis: A Practical Guide. London: Sage.

van der Houwen, F. (2005) Negotiating Disputes and Achieving Judgments on Judge Judy. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.

van der Houwen, F. (2009) Formulating disputes. Journal of Pragmatics 41 (10): 2072–2085. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.02.009

Refbacks

There are currently no refbacks.

Equinox Publishing Ltd - 415 The Workstation 15 Paternoster Row, Sheffield, S1 2BX United Kingdom
Telephone: +44 (0)114 221-0285 - Email: info@equinoxpub.com