Talking about paranoid experiences: Interactional dynamics of accomplishing disclosure of psychotic symptoms in triadic conversation

doi:10.1558/cam.v12i1.20214

Communication & Medicine, Vol 12, No 1 (2015)

Talking about paranoid experiences: Interactional dynamics of accomplishing disclosure of psychotic symptoms in triadic conversation

Pertti Olavi Hella, Jussi Niemi, Jani-Matti Tirkkonen, Jukka Hintikka, Hannu Koponen, Heli Koivumaa-Honkanen

Issued Date: 7 Jun 2016

Abstract

The present study is the first to investigate, using conversation analysis, the effects of a family member’s participation in conversation regarding the assessment of need for treatment. We aim at describing the course of a treatment negotiation, focusing on interactional dynamics and on disclosure of paranoid symptoms in a clinically challenging situation characterized by an acutely psychotic patient with (1) disorganized discourse, (2) poor insight, (3) aspiration to avoid hospital treatment, and (4) a relative who was supporting in-patient care. In the triadic conversation, in which the patient, his relative, and the psychiatrist participated, different consecutive phases were distinguished. The Relative Prominent Information Phase (RIP) was characterized by the relative’s statements on the patient’s problematic behavior, and conflicting views between the patient and his relative led to denial of symptoms by the patient. When the patient was prominent in the latter Patient Prominent Information Phase (PIP), the display of several different social actions and corresponding linguistic devices were linked with more overt talk about paranoid experiences by the patient, albeit in a disorganized manner. RIP and PIP were followed by an Evaluation and Decision Phase (EDP).

Download Media

PDF (Price: £17.50 ) Restricted Access

DOI: 10.1558/cam.v12i1.20214

References

Alanen, Y. O., Lehtinen, K., Räkköläinen, V. and Aaltonen, J. (1991) Need-adapted treatment of new schizophrenic patients: Experiences and results of the Turku project. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 83 (5): 363–372. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0447.1991.tb05557.x

Andersen, T. (1995) Reflecting processes: Acts of informing and forming. In S. Friedman (ed.) The Reflecting Team in Action: Collaborative Practice in Family Therapy, 11–37. New York: Guilford Press.

Anderson, H., Goolishian, H. A. and Windermand, L. (1986) Problem determined systems: Towards transformation in family therapy. Journal of Strategic and Systemic Therapies 5 (4): 1–13.

Andreasen, N. C. (1986) Scale for the assessment of thought, language and communication (TLC). Schizophrenia Bulletin 12 (3): 473–482. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/schbul/12.3.473

Antaki, C. (2008) Formulations in psychotherapy. In A. Peräkylä, C. Antaki, S. Vehviläinen and I. Leudar (eds) Conversation Analysis and Psychotherapy, 26–42. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511490002.003

Barch, D. M. and Berenbaum, H. (1997) The effect of language production manipulations on negative thought disorder and discourse coherence disturbances in schizophrenia. Psychiatry Research 71 (2): 115–127. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0165-1781(97)00045-0

Bergmann, J. R. (1992) Veiled morality: Notes on discretion in psychiatry. In P. Drew and J. Heritage (eds) Talk at Work, 137–162. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Covington, M. A., He, C., Brown, C., Naci, L., McClain, J. T., Fjordbak, B. S., Semple, J. and Brown, J. (2005) Schizophrenia and the structure of language: The linguist’s view. Schizophrenia Research 77 (1): 85–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2005.01.016

Depperman, A. and Spranz-Fogasy, T. (2011) Doctors’ questions as displays of understanding. Communication & Medicine 8 (2): 111–122.

Ditman, T., Goff, D. and Kuperberg, G. (2011) Slow and steady: Sustained effects of lexico-semantic associations can mediate referential impairments in schizophrenia. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience 11 (2): 245–258. http://dx.doi.org/
10.3758/s13415-011-0020-7

Ditman, T. and Kuperberg, G. R. (2007) The time course of building discourse coherence in schizophrenia: An ERP investigation. Psychophysiology 44 (6): 991–1001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00565.x

First, M. B., Spitzer, R. L., Gibbon M. and Williams, J. B. W. (1996) Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders, Clinician Version (SCID-CV). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.

Hella, P., Niemi, J., Hintikka, J., Otsa, L., Tirkkonen, J. M. and Koponen, H. (2013) Disordered semantic activation in disorganized discourse in schizophrenia: A new pragma-linguistic tool for structure and meaning reconstruction. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders 48 (3): 320–328. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12011

Ho, B-C., Flaum, M., Hubbard, W., Arndt, S. and Andreasen, N. C. (2004) Validity of symptom assessment in psychotic disorders: Information variance across different sources of history. Schizophrenia Research 68 (2–3): 299–307. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2003.07.006

Holma, J. and Aaltonen, J. (1998) Narrative understanding in acute psychosis. Contemporary Family Therapy 20 (3): 253–263. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1022432810652

Hutchby, I. and Wooffitt, R. (2008) Conversation Analysis. Second edition. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Kay S. R., Fiszbein, A. and Opler, L. A. (1987) The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale for schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin 13 (2): 261–276. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/schbul/13.2.261

Kuperberg, G. R., Kreher, D. A. and Ditman, T. (2010) What can event-related potentials tell us about language, and perhaps even thought, in schizophrenia? International Journal of Psychophysiology 75 (2): 66–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2009.09.005

Marini, A., Spoletini, I., Rubino, I. A., Ciuffa, M., Bria P., Martinotti, G., Banfi, G., Boccascino, R., Strom, P., Siracusano, A., Caltagirone, C. and Spalletta, G. (2008) The language of schizophrenia: An analysis of micro and macrolinguistic abilities and their neuropsychological correlates. Schizophrenia Research 105 (1–3): 144–155. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2008.07.011

McCabe, R., Heath, C., Burns, T. and Priebe, S. (2002) Engagement of patients with psychosis in the medical consultation: Conversion analytic study. British Medical Journal 325: 1148–1151. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.325.7373.1148

Niznikiewicz, M., Singh Mittal, M., Nestor, P. G. and McCarley, R. W. (2010) Abnormal inhibitory processes in semantic networks in schizophrenia. International Journal of Psychophysiology 75 (2): 133–140. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2009.10.006

Nordgaard, J., Revsbech, R., Saebye, D. and Parnas, J. (2012) Assessing the diagnostic validity of a structured psychiatric interview in a first-admission hospital sample. World Psychiatry 11 (3): 181–185. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.2051-5545.2012.tb00128.x

Nordgaard, J., Sass, L. A. and Parnas, J. (2012) The psychiatric interview: Validity, structure, and subjectivity. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience 263 (4): 353–364. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00406-012-0366-z

Pawelczyk, J. (2011) Talk as Therapy: Psychotherapy in a Linguistic Perspective. Boston and Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9781934078679

Pijnenborg, G. H. M., van Donkersgoed, R. J. M., David, A. S. and Aleman, A. (2013) Changes in insight during treatment of psychotic disorders: A meta-analysis. Schizophrenia Research 144 (1–3): 109–117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2012.11.018

Pilnick, A. and Dingwall, R. (2011) On the remarkable persistence of asymmetry in doctor/patient interaction: A critical review. Social Science & Medicine 72 (8): 1374–1382. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.02.033

Seedhouse, P. (2004) Conversation analysis methodology. Language Learning 54 (S1): 1–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2004.00268.x

Seikkula, J. and Olson, M. E. (2003) The open dialogue approach to acute psychosis: Its poetics and micropolitics. Family Process 42 (3): 403–417. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.2003.00403.x

Sidnell, J. (2013) Basic conversation analytic methods. In J. Sidnell and T. Stivers (eds) The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, 77–99. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

Silverman, D. and Peräkylä, A. (1990) AIDS counselling: The interactional organization of talk about ‘delicate’ issues. Sociology of Health & Illness 12 (3): 293–318. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.ep11347251

Stivers, T. (2013) Sequence organization. In J. Sidnell and T. Stivers (eds) The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, 191-209. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

Tsai, M.-H. (2007) Who gets to talk? An alternative framework evaluating companion effects in geriatric triads. Communication & Medicine 4 (1): 37–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/cam.2007.005

Vehviläinen, S. (2008) Identifying and managing resistance in psychoanalytic interaction. In A. Peräkylä, C. Antaki, S. Vehviläinen and I. Leudar (eds) Conversation Analysis and Psychotherapy, 120–138. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511490002.008

White, M. and Epston, D. (1990) Narrative Means to Therapeutic Ends. New York: W. W. Norton.

Refbacks

There are currently no refbacks.

Equinox Publishing Ltd - 415 The Workstation 15 Paternoster Row, Sheffield, S1 2BX United Kingdom
Telephone: +44 (0)114 221-0285 - Email: info@equinoxpub.com