East Asian Pragmatics, Vol 1, No 2 (2016)

Cognitive pragmatics as an account of derivational machinery: A research trend in Japan

Takuo Hayashi
Issued Date: 11 Nov 2016

Abstract


The aim of this article is to advocate ‘cognitive pragmatics,’ an approach which incorporates the insights of cognitive linguistics. It comes under the school of the ‘perspective view’ of pragmatics, which seeks to reveal (for all functional aspects of linguistic phenomena) the reason why the speaker chooses particular expressions (at any linguistic level or unit) to ‘adapt to’ the communicative needs of the situation. The author discusses several of such studies in Japan to demonstrate how the pragmatic choice of various constructions reflects the general cognitive abilities and principles of human beings. The topics of the research discussed in this paper concern inferential meaning, information flow, interactional construction, and politeness, which represent four main facets of pragmatics. It contends that cognitive pragmatics provides us with a systematic account of how the selection of particular structures are related to their pragmatic effects.

Download Media

PDF (Price: £17.50 )

DOI: 10.1558/eap.v1i2.31126

References


Bara, B. (2011). Cognitive pragmatics: The mental processes of communication. Intercultural Pragmatics (8)3, 443–485. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/iprg.2011.020

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Chafe, W. L. (1994). Discourse, consciousness, and time: The flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Du Bois, J. W. (1985). Competing motivations. In J. Haiman (Ed.) Iconicity in syntax (pp. 343–365). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/tsl.6.17dub

Du Bois, J. W. (2001). Towards a dialogic syntax. Draft manuscript.

Du Bois, J. W. (2014). Towards a dialogic syntax. Cognitive Linguistics 25(3), 359–410.http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/cog-2014-0024

Evans, V. (2010). Morris, C. In L. Cummings (Ed.), The pragmatics encyclopedia (pp. 46–49). Abingdon: Routledge. 

Evans, V., & Green, M. (2006). Cognitive linguistics: An introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Fillmore, C. (1982). Frame semantics. In the Linguistic Society of Korea (Ed.) Linguistics in the morning calm(pp. 111–137). Seoul: Hanshin.

Fukada, C. (2013). Approaching Ernest Hemingway’s works from the perspective of ‘Who sees what’ . Proceedings of the 15th Conference of the Pragmatics Society of Japan (pp. 307–310).

Goffman, E. (1955). On face-work: An analysis of ritual elements of social interaction. Psychiatry; Journal for the Study of Interpersonal Processes. 18 (3), 213–231.

Goffman, E. (1971). Relations in public. New York: Basic Books.

Grice, H. P. (1967). Logic and conversation. (William James lectures).

Grice, H.P.(1989) Logic and conversation. In P. Cole and J. Morgan (Eds.) Syntax and semantics: Vol. 3. Speech acts (pp. 41–58). New York: Academic Press.

Haberland, H. (2010). Pragmatics as a component vs. pragmatics as a perspective of linguistics. Studies in Pragmatics, 12, 54–68.

Haberland, H., & Mey, J. L. (1977). Editorial: Linguistics and pragmatics. Journal of Pragmatics, 1(1), 1–16.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(77)90019-4

Hart, C., & Lukeš, D. (Eds.) (2015). Cognitive linguistics in critical discourse analysis: Application and theory. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Hayashi, T. (1996). Politeness in conflict management: A conversation analysis of dispreferred message from a cognitive perspective. Journal of Pragmatics (25)2, 227–255. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)00080-8

Hayashi, T. (1999). A metacognitive model of conversational planning. Pragmatics and Cognition 7(1), 94–145.http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/pc.7.1.06hay

Hayashi, T. (2009a). On face and politeness: A new model based on duality, reflexivity and reciprocity. Studies in Pragmatics 2, 15–31.

Hayashi, T. (2009b). Face construal from paradigmatic and syntagmatic perspectives. In B. Fraser & K. Turner (Eds.) Language in life, and a life in language: Jacob Mey – a festschrift (Studies in Pragmatics 6, pp. 159–165). Bingley, West Yorkshire: Emerald. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004253209_021

Hayashi, T. (2009c). ‘Ninchigoyouron’ no rirontekikiban to sono houkousei nitsuite [On theoretical foundation of ‘cognitive pragmatics’ and its direction]. Sougokenkyusho Kiyou [The Research Institute Bulletin of St. Andrew’s University], 34(3), 63–82.

Hayashi, T. (2009d). Hito wa suironteki imi wo donoyo ni rikai surunoka: ‘sanshotenkidou no suiron moderu’ ni motozuku hatsuwa no gan-i no bunseki [How do people understand presumptive meaning? An analysis of conversational implicature based on ‘Reference-point driven implicature model’] Genngokagaku Ronshu(Papers in Linguistic Science, Kyoto University), 15, 1–28.

Hayashi, T. (2013). The effect of conceptualization on the pragmatic meaning of politeness. Studies in Pragmatics 15, 57–78.

Huang, Y. (2007). Pragmatics. New York: Oxford University Press.

Jackendoff, R. (1983). Semantics and cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Kasher, A. (1991). On the pragmatic modules: A lecture. Journal of Pragmatics 16, 381–397. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(91)90132-H

Lakoff, G. (1987a). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001

Lakoff, G. (1987b). Cognitive models and prototype theory. In U. Neisser (Ed.) Concepts and conceptual development: ecological and intellectual factors in categorization (pp. 63–100). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar: Vol. 1. Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Langacker, R. W. (1993). Reference point constructions. Cognitive Linguistics 4(1), 1–38.http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1993.4.1.1

Langacker, R. W. (2001). Discourse in cognitive grammar. Cognitive Linguistics 12(2), 143–188.http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/cogl.12.2.143

Langacker, R. W. (2008). Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001

Leech, G. (2004). Meaning and the English verb. London: Longman.

Mead, G. H. (Ed.) (1934). Mind, self and society from the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Morris, W. C. (1938). Foundations of the theory of signs. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Morris, W. C. (1946). Signs, language and behavior. New York: Prentice Hall Inc. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/14607-000

Nishitaya, H. (2006). Ninchi monogatari-ron towa nani ka? [What is cognitive narratology?]. Tokyo: Hitsuji Shyobo.

Okamoto, M. (2010). Retorikkugaterasu ninnchi to kominyukeeshon no sougosayou [Interaction between cognition and communication reflected in rhetoric] (pp. 169–222), Ninchi to taiwa & jyoho [Cognition and conversation/information] (pp. 87–130). In T. Sakita & M. Okamoto, Gengo unyo no dainamizumu[Dynamism of language use]. Tokyo: Kenkyusha.

Recanati, F. (2004). Pragmatics and semantics. In L.R. Horn & G. Ward (Eds.), The handbook of pragmatics (pp. 442–462). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

Sakita, T. (2006). Parallelism in conversation: Resonance, schematization, and extension from the perspective of dialogic syntax and cognitive linguistics. Pragmatics and Cognition 14(3), 467–500. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/pc.14.3.03sak

Sakita, T. (2010). Ninchi to danwa & jyoho [Cognition and discourse/information] (pp. 13– 86), Ninchi to taiwa & jyoho [Cognition and conversation/information] (pp. 87–130). In T. Sakita & M. Okamoto, Gengo unyo no dainamizumu [Dynamism of language use]. Tokyo: Kenkyusha.

Searle, J. R. (1975). A taxonomy of illocutionary acts. In J. R. Searle, Experience and meaning: Studies in the theory of speech acts (pp. 1–29). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,

Shook, J. (2010). Morris, C. In L. Cummings (Ed.), The pragmatics encyclopedia (pp. 280–282). Abingdon: Routledge.

Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.

Tannen, D. (1987). Repetiton in conversation: Toward a poetics of talk. Language 63(3), 574–605.http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/415006

Taylor, J. R (2003). Cognitive grammar (Oxford Textbooks in Linguistics) New York: Oxford University Press.

Verschueren, J. (1999). Understanding pragmatics. London: Arnold.

Verschueren, J. (2009). Introduction: The pragmatic perspective. In J. Verschueren & J. Östman (Eds.) Key notions for pragmatics (Handbook of Pragmatics Highlights 1, pp. 1–27). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Yamanashi, M. (2000). Negative inference, space construal, and grammaticalization. In L. R. Horn and Y. Kato (Eds.) Negation and polarity: Syntactic and semantic perspectives (pp. 243–254). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Yamanashi, M. (2001). Ninchi goyouron [Cognitive pragmatics]. In T. Koizumi (Ed.) Nyuumon goyouron kenkyuu: Riron to ouyou [Introduction to studies of pragmatics: Theory and application] (pp. 179–194). Tokyo: Kenkyusha.

Yamanashi, M. (2004). Kotoba no ninchi kuukan [Cognitive space of language]. Tokyo: Kaitakusha. 

Yamanashi, M. (2009). Ninchigoyouron kara mita bunpou-ronri-retorikku [Grammar, logic and rhetoric from the perspective of cognitive pragmatics]. Studies in Pragmatics, 11, 61–97.

Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.





Equinox Publishing Ltd - 415 The Workstation 15 Paternoster Row, Sheffield, S1 2BX United Kingdom
Telephone: +44 (0)114 221-0285 - Email: info@equinoxpub.com

Privacy Policy