An analysis of Charles Dickens’s gender-based use of speech verbs
Abstract
This article presents a study of Charles Dickens's gender-based use of speech verbs. The aim of the analysis is to demonstrate that gender is one dimension of variation in the way in which Dickens constructs characters through their ways of speaking, thereby reinforcing the well-established antagonistic representation of male and female character types in his fictional universe. The article focuses on the 130 verbs identified in his fourteen complete novels, more than half of which (73) are associated exclusively, or almost exclusively, with either male or female figures. As will be shown, the systematic use of these gender-marked verbs reveals different personality traits that trigger information about both genders, thus contributing to their dichotomous characterisation. The analysis will also shed further light upon the dominant Victorian ideology concerning the representation of gender in fiction.
Download Media
PDF (Price: £17.50 )
DOI: 10.1558/genl.31137
References
Ayres, B. (2003) Silent Voices: Forgotten Novels by Victorian Women Writers. London: Greenwood Publishing Group.
Barickman, R (1982) The subversive methods of Dickens’ early fiction: Martin Chuzzlewit. In W. S. Johnson (ed.) Charles Dickens: New Perspectives 37–50. London: Prentice-Hall.
Basch, F. (1974) Relative Creatures: Victorian Women in Society and the Novel 1837–67. London: Penguin Books.
Bowen, J. and Patten, R. L (eds) (2006) Palgrave Advances in Charles Dickens Studies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230524200
Brook, G. L. (1970) The Language of Dickens. London: Andre Deutsch.
Brown, G. (1990) Listening to Spoken English. London: Longman.
Caldas-Coulthard, C. R. (1987) Reported speech in written narrative texts. In M. Coulthard (ed.) Discussing Discourse 149–67. Birmingham: University of Birmingham.
Caldas-Coulthard, Carmen R. (1994) On reporting reporting: the representation of speech in factual and factional narratives. In M. Coulthard (ed.) Advances in Written Text Analysis 295–308. London: Routledge.
Carey, J. (1973) The Violent Effigy: A Study of Dickens’ Imagination. London: Faber & Faber.
Chapman, R (1994) Forms of Speech in Victorian Fiction. London: Pearson Education.
Colatosti, C. (1990) Male versus female self-denial: the subversive potential of the feminine ideal in the fiction of Charles Dickens. Dickens Studies Annual 19: 1–24.
Cole, N. B (2009) Dickens and Gender: Recent Studies, 1992–2008. New York: Ams Press.
Coolidge, A. C. (1967) Dickens as a Serial Novelist. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.
Culpeper, J. (2001) Language and Characterisation: People in Plays and Other Texts. Harlow: Pearson Education.
Dyson, A. E. (1970) The Inimitable Dickens: A Reading of the Novels. London: Macmillan.
Gissing, G. ([1898]1974) Charles Dickens: A Critical Study. New York: Haskell House Publishers.
Golding, R. (1985) Idiolects in Dickens: The Major Techniques and Chronological Development. London: Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-18021-9
Hawes, D. (2002) Who is Who in Dickens. London: Routledge.
Hawes, D. (2007) Charles Dickens. London: Continuum.
Holbrook, D. (1993) Charles Dickens and the Image of Woman. New York: New York University Press.
Ingham, P. (1992) Dickens, Women and Language. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Ingham, P. (1996) The Language of Gender and Class: Transformation in the Victorian Novel. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203418697
John, J. (2001) Dickens’s Villains: Melodrama, Character, Popular Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198184614.001.0001
Kissine, M. (2010) Metaphorical projection, subjectification and English speech act verbs. Folia Linguistica 44(2): 339–70. https://doi.org/10.1515/flin.2010.013
Klamer, M. (2000) How report verbs become quote markers and complementisers. Lingua 110: 69–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3841(99)00032-7
Korte, B. (1997) Body Language in Literature. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442671492
Kortsch, C. B. (2009) Dress Culture in Late Victorian Women’s Fiction. Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing Company.
Leech, G. (1974) Semantics. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
Mahlberg, M. (2013) Corpus Stylistics and Dickens’s Fiction. Abingdon: Routledge.
Millet, K. (1970) Sexual Politics. London: Virago.
Murphy, P. (2006) In Science’s Shadow: Literary Constructions of Late Victorian Women. Columbia, MO: University of Missouri Press.
Nead, L. (1988) Myths of Sexuality: Representations of Women in Victorian Fiction. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Quirk, R. (1961) Some observations on the language of Dickens. A Review of English Literature 2: 19–28.
Ruano San Segundo, P. (2016) A corpus-stylistic approach to Dickens’ use of speech verbs: Beyond mere reporting. Language and Literature 25(2): 113–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947016631859
Rudzka-Ostyn, B. (1988) Semantic extensions into the domain of verbal communication. In B. Rudzka-Ostyn (ed.) Topics in cognitive linguistics 507–53. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.50.19rud
Slater, M. (1983) Dickens and Women. London: Dent.
Thompson, N. D. (1999) Victorian Women Writers and the Woman Question. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511659348
Tomalin, C. (1991) The Invisible Woman: the Story of Nelly Ternan and Charles Dickens. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Urban, M. and Ruppenhofer, J. (2001) Shouting and screaming: Manner and noise verbs in communication. Literary and Linguistic Computing 16 (1): 73–94. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/16.1.77
Warhol, R. (1989) Gendered Interventions: Narrative Discourse in the Victorian Novel. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Zwicky, A. M. (1971) In a manner of speaking. Linguistic Inquiry 1(1): 1–11.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
