International Journal of Speech Language and the Law, Vol 24, No 1 (2017)

Power, solidarity and tag questions in crisis negotiations

Gabriela Beyatriz Rubin
Issued Date: 14 Jun 2017


This article examines the use of tag questions in five crisis negotiations to simultaneously minimize power asymmetries and assert influence over subjects. I utilize an Interactional Sociolinguistic approach to identify the discursive functions that different types of tag questions fulfill for the crisis negotiators. I find that facilitative tag questions reinforce a ‘collaborative problem solving’ frame (Tannen & Wallat 1993) and minimize the significance of the subject’s negative actions, while softening tag questions turn orders into requests to influence the subject’s decision-making. The successful use of tag questions for these purposes allows the negotiator to appear empathic while maintaining control of the overall situation. This paper contributes to linguistic and practitioner understandings by 1) operationalizing goals like 'rapport' and 'influence' and 2) identifying the functions that tag questions can serve in this high-stakes interactional context.

Download Media

PDF (Price: £17.50 )

DOI: 10.1558/ijsll.31003


Agar, M. (1985) Institutional discourse. Text 5: 147--168.

Algeo, J. (1990) It’s a myth, innit? Politeness and the English tag question. In C. Ricks & L. Michaels (eds) The state of the language 443--450. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Baffy, M., & Marsters, A. (2015) The constructed voice in courtroom cross-examination. International Journal of Speech Language and the Law 22(2): 143--165.

Blankenship, K. L., & Holtgraves, T. (2005) The effects of linguistic markers of powerlessness in the processes of persuasion. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 24: 3--24.

Blankenship, K. L., & Craig, T. Y. (2007). Language and persuasion: Tag questions as powerless speech or as interpreted in context. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 43(1): 112--118.

Boltz, F. & Hershey, L. (1979) Hostage cop. New York, NY: Rawson Wade.

Borowsky, J. (2011) Responding to threats: A case study of power and influence in a hostage negotiation event. Journal of Police Crisis Negotiations 11(1): 1--19.

Brown, P. & Levinson, S. (1978) Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Bucholtz, M. (2000) The politics of transcription. Journal of Pragmatics 32(10): 1439--1465.

Cameron, D., McAlinden, F., & O’Leary, K. (1988) Lakoff in context: The social and linguistic functions of tag questions. In J. Coates & D. Cameron (eds) Women in their speech communities 74--93. London, UK: Longman.

Collins, R., Lincoln, R., & Frank, M. G. (2002) The effect of rapport in forensic interviewing. Psychiatry Psychology and Law 9(1): 69--78.

Dolnik, A. & Fitzgerald, K.M. (2011) Negotiating hostage crises with the new terrorists. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 34(4): 267--294.

Donohue, W. A., & Roberto, A. J. (1996) An empirical examination of three models of integrative and distributive bargaining. International Journal of Conflict Management 7(3): 209--229.

Dubois, B. L., & Crouch, I. (1975) The question of tag questions in women's speech: they don't really use more of them, do they?. Language in Society 4(3): 289--294.

Fairclough, N. (1989) Language and power. London, UK: Longman.

Fowler, R., & DeVivo, P. P. (2001) Analyzing police hostage negotiations with the verbal interactional analysis technique. Journal of Police Crisis Negotiations 1(1): 83--97.

Goffman, E. (1967) Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face interaction. New York, NY: Anchor Books.

Gordon, C. (2015) Framing and Positioning. In D. Tannen, H. E. Hamilton, & D. Schiffrin (eds) The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, Volume 1 (2nd Edition) 324--345. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.

Gumperz, J. J. (2003) Interactional sociolinguistics: a personal perspective. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen and H. E. Hamilton (eds) The Handbook of Discourse Analysis 503--517.

Hammer, M. R. (2007) Saving lives: The SAFE model for resolving hostage and crisis incidents. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group.

Holmes, J. (1982) The functions of tag questions. English Language Research Journal 3: 40--65.

Holmes, J. (1984) “Women's language”: A functional approach. General Linguistics 24(3): 149--178.

Holmes, J. (1986) Functions of you know in women and men’s speech. Language and Society 15(1): 1--21.

Holmes, J. (1995) Men, women and politeness. London, UK: Longman.

Huddleston, R. & Pullum, G. K. (2002) The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Kimps, D., Davidse, K., & Cornillie, B. (2014) A speech function analysis of tag questions in British English spontaneous dialogue. Journal of Pragmatics 66: 64--85.

Lakoff, R. (1973) Language and woman's place. Language in Society, 2(01), 45—79.

Mayr, A. (2008) Introduction: Power, discourse and institutions. In A. Mayr (ed.) Language and power: An introduction to institutional discourse 1--26. London, UK: Continuum International Publishing Group.

McMains, M.J. & Mullins, W.C. (2015) Crisis negotiations: Managing critical incidents and hostage situations in law enforcement and corrections (5th Edition). New York, NY: Routledge.

Moore, E., & Podesva, R. (2009) Style, indexicality, and the social meaning of tag questions. Language in Society 38(4): 447--485.

Newbury, P. & Johnson, A. (2006) Suspects’ resistance to constraining and coercive questioning strategies in the police interview. The International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law 13(2): 213--240. 10.1558/ijsll.2006.13.2.213

Noesner, G. (1999) Negotiation concepts for incident commanders. FBI Law enforcement Bulletin 68(1): 6--14. Retrieved from

Noesner, G.W. & Webster, M. (1997) Crisis intervention: Using active listening skills in negotiations. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin 66(8): 13--18. Retrieved from

O’Barr, W., & B. Atkins. (1980) Women’s Language or Powerless Language?. In S. McConnell-Ginet, R. Barker, & N. Furman (eds). Women and language in literature and society 93--110. New York, NY: Praeger.

Pichler, H. (2013) The structure of discourse-pragmatic variation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.

Pinizzotto, A.J. & Davis, E.F. (1996) Interviewing methods. Law and Order 68--72.

Regini, C. (2002) Crisis negotiation teams: Selection and training. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin 71(11): 1--5. Retrieved from

Royce, T. (2012) The analysis of police crisis negotiations: Important interactional features. International Journal of Law, Language & Discourse 2(3): 1--24.

Schlossberg, H. (1979) Police response to hostage negotiations. In J.T. O’Brien & M. Marcus (eds), Crime and justice in America 87--102. New York, NY: Pergamon Press.

Shuy, R.W. (1998) The Language of confession, interrogation, and deception. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Stenström, A. (1994) An introduction to spoken interaction. London, UK: Longman.

Stenström, A., Andersen, G., & Hasund, I.K. (2002) Chapter 7: Teenagers’ use of tags. Trends in teenage talk: Corpus compilation, analysis, and findings. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing.

Tannen, D. (1994) Gender and discourse. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Tannen, D. & Wallat, C. (1993) Interactive Frames and Knowledge Schemas in Interaction: Examples from a Medical Examination/ Interview. In D. Tannen (ed.), Framing in Discourse. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Taylor, P. J., & Donohue, W. (2006) Hostage negotiation opens up. In A. Schneider, C. Kupfer, & C. Honeyman (eds) The negotiator’s fieldbook 667--675. Washington, DC: The American Bar Association.

Tottie, G., & Hoffmann, S. (2006) Tag questions in British and American English. Journal of English Linguistics 34(4): 283--311.

Tottie, G. & Hoffman, S. (2009) Tag questions in English: the first century. Journal of English Linguistics 37: 130--161.

Vecchi, G. M., Van Hasselt, V. B., & Romano, S. J. (2005) Crisis (hostage) negotiation: current strategies and issues in high-risk conflict resolution. Aggression and Violent Behavior 10: 533--551. Retrieved from

Wang, J. (2006) Questions and the exercise of power. Discourse & Society 17(4): 529--548. 10.1177/0957926506063127

Wodak, R. (2009) The discourse of politics in action: Politics as usual. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (eds). (2015) Methods of critical discourse studies (3rd ed.). London, UK: Sage.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Equinox Publishing Ltd - 415 The Workstation 15 Paternoster Row, Sheffield, S1 2BX United Kingdom
Telephone: +44 (0)114 221-0285 - Email: [email protected]

Privacy Policy