Phraseology, argumentation and identity in the Supreme Court of Ireland’s judgments on language policy
Abstract
Download Media
PDF (Price: £17.50 )DOI: 10.1558/japl.32729
References
Alexy, R. (1989) A Theory of Legal Argumentation: The Theory of Rational Discourse as Theory of Legal Justification. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Anthony, L. (2006) AntConc 3.2.1. Available at: http://www.laurenceanthony.net
Baker, P. and McEnery, T. (2015) Corpora and Discourse Studies: Integrating Discourse and Corpora. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137431738
Besselink, L. (2010) National and constitutional identity before and after Lisbon. Utrecht Law Review 6 (3): 36–49. https://doi.org/10.18352/ulr.139
Biber, D. (2006) University Language: A Corpus-Based Study of Spoken and Written Registers. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.23
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. and Finegan, E. (1999) Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.
Breeze, R. (2013) Lexical bundles across four legal genres. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 18 (2): 229–253. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.18.2.03bre
Byrne, R., McCutcheon, P., Bruton, C. and Coffey, G. (2014) The Irish Legal System. Dublin: Bloomsbury.
Carbonell, F. (2013) Reasoning by consequences: Applying different argumentation structures to the analysis of consequentialist reasoning in judicial decisions. In C. Dahlman and E. T. Feteris (eds) Legal Argumentation Theory: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives, 1–20. Dordrecht: Springer.
Charles, M., Pecorari D. and Hunston, S. (2009) Introduction: Exploring the interface between corpus linguistics and discourse analysis. In M. Charles, D. Pecorari and S. Hunston (eds) Academic Writing: At the Interface of Corpus and Discourse, 1–10. London: Continuum.
Comparato, G. (2014) New voices: Challenging legal culture. European Journal of Legal Studies 7 (2): 5–17.
Doyle, O. (2008) Constitutional Law: Text, Cases and Materials. Dublin: Clarus Press.
Feteris, E. T. (2002) A pragma-dialectical approach of the analysis and evaluation of pragmatic argumentation in a legal context. Argumentation 16 (3): 349–367. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019999606665
Gabrielatos, C., McEnery, T., Diggle, P. J. and Baker, P. (2012) The peaks and troughs of corpus-based contextual analysis. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 17 (2): 151–175. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.17.2.01gab
Goodrich, P. (1987) Legal Discourse. Basingstoke, UK: MacMillan.
Goźdź-Roszkowski, S. (2011) Patterns of Linguistic Variation in American Legal English: A Corpus-Based Study. Bern: Peter Lang. https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-653-00659-9
Groom, N. (2010) Closed-class keywords and corpus-driven discourse analysis. In M. Bondi and M. Scott (eds) Keyness in Texts, 59–78. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.41.05gro
Hunston, S. (2008) Starting with the small words: Patterns, lexis and semantic sequences. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 13 (3): 271–295. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.13.3.03hun
Juthe, A. (2005) Argument by analogy. Argumentation 19 (1): 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-005-2314-9
Law, S. (2015) From multiple legal cultures to one legal culture? Thinking about culture, tradition and identity in European private law development. Utrecht Journal of International and European Law 31 (81): 68–87. https://doi.org/10.5334/ujiel.dg
Mazzi, D. (2007) The Linguistic Study of Judicial Argumentation. Theoretical Perspectives, Analytical Insights. Modena: Il Fiorino.
McEnery, T. and Hardie, A. (2011) Corpus Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511981395
Morgan, D. G. (2001) A Judgment Too Far? Judicial Activism and the Constitution. Cork: Cork University Press.
Ó Beoláin v. Fahy (2001) IESC 37; (2001) 2 IR 279. Available at: http://www.bailii.org/ie/cases/IESC/2001/
Ó Cearúil, M. (1999) Bunreacht na hÉireann. A Study of the Irish Text. Dublin: Stationery Office of the Government of Ireland.
Ó Conaill, S. (2014) Judicial pragmatism at the expense of language rights: the Ó Maicín decision. Available at: http://constitutionproject.ie/?p=309
Ó Foghludha v. McClean (1934) IR 469. Available at: http://www.coimisineir.ie/downloads/LanguageRights.pdf
Ochs, E. (1993) Constructing social identity: A language socialization perspective. Research on Language and Social Interaction 26 (3): 287–306. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi2603_3
Partington, A., Duguid, A. and Taylor, C. (2013) Patterns and Meanings in Discourse: Theory and Practice in Corpus-Assisted Discourse Studies (CADS). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.55
Peczenik, A. (1989) On Law and Reason. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Pontrandolfo, G. (2013) La fraseología como estilema del lenguaje judicial: El caso de las locuciones prepositivas desde una perspectiva contrastiva. In L. Chierichetti and G. Garofalo (eds) Discurso Profesional y Lingüística de Corpus: Perspectivas de Investigación, 187–215. Bergamo: CELSB.
Rigotti, E. and Greco Morasso. S. (2010) Comparing the Argumentum Model of Topics to other contemporary approaches to argument schemes: The procedural and material components. Argumentation 24 (4): 489–512. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-010-9190-7
Sinclair, J. (2004) Trust the Text: Language, Corpus and Discourse. London and New York: Routledge.
Snoeck Henkemans, A. F. (2003) Complex argumentation in a critical discussion. Argumentation 17 (4): 405–419. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026390419589
Stubbs, M. (2001) Words and Phrases: Corpus Studies on Lexical Semantics. Oxford: Blackwell.
Van De Mieroop, D. (2007) The complementarity of two identities and two approaches: Quantitative and qualitative analysis of institutional and professional identity. Journal of Pragmatics 39: 1120–1142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.01.009
van Eemeren, F. H. (2016) Identifying argumentative patterns: A vital step in the development of pragma-dialectics. Argumentation 30: 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-015-9377-z
van Eemeren, F. H. and Grootendorst, R. (1992) Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
van Eemeren, F. H., Houtlosser, P. and Snoeck Henkemans, A. F. (2007) Argumentative Indicators in Discourse: A Pragma-Dialectical Approach. Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6244-5
van Poppel, L. (2012) Pragmatic argumentation in health brochures. Journal of Argumentation in Context 1 (1): 97–112. https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.1.1.08pop
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.