The Philosophy and Semantics of the Cognitive Science of Religion
Abstract
Download Media
PDF (Price: £17.50 )References
Andresen, Jensine. 2001. Religion in Mind: Cognitive Perspectives on Religious Belief, Ritual, and Experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511586330
Anttonen, Veikko. 2000. “Toward a Cognitive Theory of the Sacred: An Ethnographic Approach.” Folklore: Electronic Journal of Folklore 14: 41–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.7592/FEJF2000.14.sacred
Atran, Scott. 2002. In Gods We Trust: The Evolutionary Landscape of Religion, Evolution and Cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Atran, Scott, and Ara Norenzayan. 2004. “Religion’s Evolutionary Landscape: Counterintuition, Commitment, Compassion, Communion.” Behavioural and Brain Sciences 27(6): 713–770. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x04000172
Barrett, Justin L. 1998. “Cognitive Constraints on Hindu Concepts of the Divine.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 37(4): 608–619. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1388144
Barrett, Justin L. 1999. “Theological Correctness: Cognitive Constraint and the Study of Religion.” Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 11(4): 325–339. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/157006899X00078
Barrett, Justin L. 2000. “Exploring the Natural Foundations of Religion.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4(1): 29–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01419-9
Barrett, Justin L. 2004. Why Would Anyone Believe in God? Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
Barrett, Justin L. 2007. “Cognitive Science of Religion: What Is It and Why Is It?” Religion Compass 1(6): 768–786. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-8171.2007.00042.x
Barrett, Justin L., and Frank C. Keil. 1996. “Conceptualizing a Nonnatural Entity: Anthropomorphism in God Concepts.” Cognitive Psychology 31 (3): 219–247. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1996.0017
Block, N. E. D. 1987. “Advertisement for a Semantics for Psychology.” Midwest Studies In Philosophy 10(1): 615–678. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4975.1987.tb00558.x
Boyer, Pascal. 1990. Tradition As Truth and Communication: A Cognitive Description of Traditional Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511521058
Boyer, Pascal. 1994. The Naturalness of Religious Ideas: A Cognitive Theory of Religion. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Boyer, Pascal. 2001. Religion Explained: The Evolutionary Origins of Religious Thought. New York: Basic Books.
Burge, Tyler. 1979. “Individualism and the Mental.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 4(1): 73–121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4975.1979.tb00374.x
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. “Language and Nature.” Mind 104(413): 1–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mind/104.413.1
Cohen, Emma. 2007. The Mind Possessed: The Cognition of Spirit Possession in an Afro-Brazilian Religious Tradition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195323351.001.0001
Davidson, Donald. 1984a. “Belief and the Basis of Meaning (1974).” Synthese 27(3/4): 309–323.
Davidson, Donald. 1984b. Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Davis, G. Scott. 2007. “Donald Davidson, Anomalous Monism and the Study of Religion.” Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 19(3/4): 200–231. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/157006807X243106
Egan, Frances. 2012. “Representationalism.” In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Cognitive Science, edited by Eric Margolis, Richard Samuels, and Stephen P. Stitch, 250–272. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195309799.003.0011
Engler, Steven, and Mark Q. Gardiner. 2009. “Religion as Superhuman Agency: On E. Thomas Lawson and Robert N. McCauley (1990), Rethinking Religion: Connecting Cognition and Culture.” In Contemporary Theories of Religion: A Critical Companion, edited by Michael Stausberg, 22–38. London: Routledge.
Engler, Steven, and Mark Q. Gardiner. 2010. “Ten Implications of Semantic Holism for Theories of Religion.” Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 22(4): 275–284. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/157006810x531067
Engler, Steven, and Mark Q. Gardiner. forthcoming. “A Critical Response to Cognitivist Theories of Religion.” In Theory/Religion/Critique: Classic and Contemporary Approaches, edited by Richard King. New York: Columbia.
Fodor, Jerry A. 1987. Psychosemantics: The Problem of Meaning in the Philosophy of Mind. Explorations in Cognitive Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Frankenberry, Nancy, ed. 2002. Radical Interpretation in Religion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613906
Frankenberry, Nancy, and Hans H. Penner, eds. 1999. Language, Truth, and Religious Belief: Studies in Twentieth-Century Theory and Method in Religion. Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press.
Gardiner, Mark Q., and Steven Engler. 2010. “Charting the Map Metaphor in Theories of Religion.” Religion 40(1): 1–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.religion.2009.08.010
Gardiner, Mark Q., and Steven Engler. 2012. “Semantic Holism and the Insider-Outsider Problem.” Religious Studies 48(2): 239–255. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0034412511000205
Geertz, Armin W. 2004. “Cognitive Approaches to the Study of Religion.” In New Approaches to the Study of Religion. Volume 2: Textual, Comparative, Sociological, and Cognitive Approaches, edited by Armin W. Geertz, Peter Antes, Randi R. Warne, 347–400. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter.
Godlove, Terry F. 1989. Religion, Interpretation, and Diversity of Belief: The Framework Model from Kant to Durkheim to Davidson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Godlove, Terry F. 1999. “Religious Discourse and First Person Authority.” In The Insider/Outsider Problem in the Study of Religion; A Reader, edited by Russell T. McCutcheon, 164–178. London: Cassell.
Godlove, Terry F. 2002. “Saving Belief: On the New Materialism in Religious Studies.” In Radical Interpretation in Religion, edited by Nancy K. Frankenberry, 10–24. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613906.003
Guthrie, Stewart. 1993. Faces in the Clouds: A New Theory of Religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Haselager, Pim, André de Groot, and Hans van Rappard. 2003. “Representationalism vs. Anti-Representationalism: A Debate for the Sake of Appearance.” Philosophical Psychology 16(1): 5–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0951508032000067761
Jensen, Jeppe Sinding. 2003. The Study of Religion in a New Key: Theoretical and Philosophical Soundings in the Comparative and General Study of Religion. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.
Jensen, Jeppe Sinding. 2004. “Meaning and Religion: On Semantics in the Study of Religion.” In New Approaches to the Study of Religion. Volume 1: Regional, Critical and Historical Approaches, edited by Armin W. Geertz Peter Antes, Randi R. Warne, 219–252. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Jensen, Jeppe Sinding. 2009. “Religion as the Unintended Product of Brain Functions in the ‘Standard Cognitive Science of Religion Model’: On Pascal Boyer, Religion Explained (2001) and Ilkka Pyysiainen, How Religion Works (2003).”
In Contemporary Theories of Religion: A Critical Companion, edited by Michael Stausberg, 129–155. London and New York: Routledge.
Jensen, Jeppe Sinding. 2010. “Doing it the Other Way Round: Religion as a Basic Case of “Normative Cognition’.” Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 22(4): 322–329. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/157006810X531102
Kamppinen, Matti. 2001. “Cognitive Study of Religion and Husserlian Phenomenology: Making Better Tools for the Analysis of Cultural Systems.” In Religion in Mind: Cognitive Perspectives on Religious Belief, Ritual, and Experience, edited by Jensine Andresen, 193–206. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511586330.008
Lawson, E. Thomas. 2000. “Towards a Cognitive Study of Religion.” Numen 47(3): 338–349. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156852700511586
Lawson, E. Thomas, and Robert N. McCauley. 1990. Rethinking Religion: Connecting Cognition and Culture. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Levy, Gabriel. 2012. “False But Significant: The Development of Falsity in Religious Cognition in Light of the Holism of the Mental.” Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 24(2): 143–165. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/157006812X632865
Margolis, Eric, Richard Samuels, and Stephen P. Stich. 2012a. “Introduction: Philosophy and Cognitive Science.” In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Cognitive Science, edited by Eric Margolis, Richard Samuels and Stephen P. Stich, 3–18. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195309799.001.0001
Margolis, Eric, Richard Samuels, and Stephen P. Stich, eds. 2012b. The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Cognitive Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Millikan, Ruth Garrett. 1984. Language, Thought, and Other Biological Categories: New Foundations for Realism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Näreaho, Leo. 2008. “The Cognitive Science of Religion: Philosophical Observations.” Religious Studies 44(1): 83–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0034412507009328
Penner, Hans H. 1994. “Holistic Analysis: Conjectures and Refutations.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 62(4): 977–996. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/LXII.4.977
Penner, Hans H. 1999. “Why Does Semantics Matter?” In Language, Truth, and Religious Belief: Studies in Twentieth-Century Theory and Method in Religion, edited by Nancy K. Frankenberry and H. H. Penner, 473–506. Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press.
Putnam, Hilary. 1973. “Meaning and Reference.” Journal of Philosophy 70(19): 699–711. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2025079
Putnam, Hilary. 1975. “The Meaning of ‘Meaning’.” In Mind, Language and Reality: Philosophical Papers Volume 2, 215–271. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pyysiäinen, Ilkka. 2001. How Religion Works: Towards a New Cognitive Science of Religion. Leiden: Brill.
Pyysiäinen, Ilkka. 2004. Magic, Miracles, and Religion: A Scientist’s Perspective. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
Pyysiäinen, Ilkka. 2012. “Cognitive Science of Religion: State-of-the-Art.” Journal for the Cognitive Science of Religion 1(1): 5–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1558/jcsr.v1i1.5
Quine, W. V. O. 1960. Word and Object. Cambridge, MA: Technology Press.
Quine, W. V. O. 1969. “Epistemology Naturalized.” In The John Dewey Essays in Philosophy, 69–90. New York: Columbia University Press.
Schilbrack, Kevin. 2002. “The Study of Religious Belief after Donald Davidson.” Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 14(3/4): 334–349. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/157006802320909756
Shapiro, Lawrence A. 2012. “Embodied Cognition.” In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Cognitive Science, edited by Eric Margolis, Richard Samuels and Stephen P. Stich, 118–146. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195309799.003.0006
Sosis, Richard, and Candace S. Alcorta. 2003. “Signaling, Solidarity and the Sacred: The Evolution of Religious Behaviour.” Evolutionary Anthropology 12(6): 264–274. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/evan.10120
Staal, Fritz. 1979. “The Meaninglessness of Ritual.” Numen 26(2): 2–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156852779X00244
Stausberg, Michael. 2009. “There Is Life in the Old Dog Yet.” In Contemporary Theories of Religion: A Critical Companion, edited by Michael Stausberg, 1–21. London: Routledge.
Whitehouse, Harvey. 1998. “The Epidemiology of Representations: Biological and Cognitive Perspectives on the Transmission of Culture.” Anthropology Today 14(6): 19–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2783237
Whitehouse, Harvey. 2004. Modes of Religiosity: A Cognitive Theory of Religious Transmission. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
Whitehouse, Harvey, and Robert N. McCauley. 2005. Mind and Religion: Psychological and Cognitive Foundations of Religiosity. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.
Wilson, David Sloan. 2002. Darwin’s Cathedral: Evolution, Religion, and the Nature of Society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226901374.001.0001
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.