Journal for the Study of Religion, Nature and Culture, Vol 14, No 1 (2020)

Robert McCauley and Ernest Thomas Lawson, Philosophical Foundations of the Cognitive Science of Religion

Hans Van Eyghen
Issued Date: 5 Aug 2020


Robert McCauley and Ernest Thomas Lawson, <i>Philosophical Foundations of the Cognitive Science of Religion</i>

Download Media


DOI: 10.1558/jsrnc.38304


Barrett, Justin L. 1999. ‘Theological Correctness: Cognitive Constraint and the Study of Religion’, Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 11: 325-39. Doi:

Bering, Jesse. 2002. ‘Intuitive Conceptions of Dead Agents’ Minds: The Natural Foundations of Afterlife Beliefs as Phenomenological Boundary’, Journal of Cognition and Culture 2: 263-308. Doi:

Boyer, Pascal. 2000. ‘Functional Origins of Religious Concepts: Ontological and Strategic Selection in Evolved Minds’, The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 6: 195-214. Doi:

Kelemen, Deborah. 1999. ‘The Scope of Teleological Thinking in Preschool Children’, Cognition 70: 241-72. Doi:

Leech, David, and Aku Visala. 2011. ‘The Cognitive Science of Religion: Implications for Theism?’, Zygon 46: 47-65. Doi:

Lindeman, Marjaana, Annika M. Svedholm-Häkkinen, and Jari Lipsanen. 2015. ‘Ontological Confusions but Not Mentalizing Abilities Predict Religious Belief, Paranormal Belief, and Belief in Supernatural Purpose’, Cognition 134: 63-76. Doi:

Salmon, Wesley. 1984. Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World (Princeton: Princeton University Press).

Van Inwagen, Peter. 2009. ‘Explaining Belief in the Supernatural: Some Thoughts on Paul Bloom’s "Religious Belief as Evolutionary Accident",’ in J. Schloss and M. J. Murray (eds.), The Believing Primate : Scientific, Philosophical, and Theological Reflections on the Origin of Religion (New York: Oxford University Press): 128-38. Doi:


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Equinox Publishing Ltd - 415 The Workstation 15 Paternoster Row, Sheffield, S1 2BX United Kingdom
Telephone: +44 (0)114 221-0285 - Email:

Privacy Policy